The state of Missouri is about to commit a high crime against feminism by making it harder for women to deny fathers access to their children, and the whores are pissed. One of the dirty tricks women use to maximize the family court payout is about to become less viable.
“On the one hand, it can prevent some parents from being unreasonable when taking the kid away from a good parent,” said Adam Sommer, a family law attorney in Warrensburg and host of the progressive podcast Heartland Pod.
Yeah, that's the point you fucking retard. It's about making the dirty tricks you and the whores you represent harder to pull off.
“It also is going to — the flip side of that coin — is going to give abusers easier, quicker access to kids that I think is going to be an unfortunate byproduct of this.”
Translation: The false abuse accusations that you advise your female clients to make as a matter course won't be as effective, and you're angry because it reduces their payday and makes it harder for them to torture men now.
Under current law, judges decide custody cases by weighing the best interests of the child
Yes, and that standard is completely subjective. Given the anti-male bias in the family courts "best interest of the child" becomes "best interest of the woman" in practice. An objective standard makes this kind of dishonesty harder, which is why the feminists are so pissed.
After years of opposing the change, family law advocates worked with legislators on provisions updating the standards judges use to determine a child’s best interest in custody cases, including related to domestic violence.
It sounds like father's rights groups have been making headway, and the bad actors protecting evil whores changed tactics to try to preserve the house of horrors that they've turned the family courts into.
Women lost custody 28% of the time they reported abuse, she found — potentially putting children in harm’s way.
Put another way, 72% of the time they were rewarded for what were most likely false allegations that women routinely use to get the upper hand in family court. The 28% represents cases where the lying was so blatant that even the notoriously corrupt family courts called them on their shit. What would really put this statistic in perspective is how often the fathers lost custody after reporting the mother's abuse of the kids.
I love how worshipping women and demonizing men is the one thing both conservatives and progressives can agree on. I'm starting to think any ideology that demands respect for women is one ultimately about controlling and cucking men
The default should be whoever destroys the family loses custody and has to pay child support, which is women 80% of the time. Still, 50/50 is a massive improvement over the current system that boils down to the best interest of the woman in practice. I just hope the legislature keeps an eye out for feminist attempts to undermine the intent of the new law. We all know that there's no depth they won't sink to to deny the father access and steal as much of his income as possible.
you can legitimately prove some form of abuse was happening
All this option opens up is women winning, because they can just cry a little and its abuse. Helped by the legal definition of abuse being open to basically anything that isn't giving her what she wants. Stop leaving these "common sense" loopholes, because all they do is get widened and themselves abused until the law itself is useless.
Divorce is supposed to be no fault, 50/50 unless abuse in a lot of states. How often does a guy end up with anything except the clothes on his back when he leaves? Probably a lot more than there are abusive guys by a factor.
He's talking about a law that would have banned lifetime alimony. DeSantis vetoed it over concerns that its retroactive provisions would have constituted an unconstitutional ex post facto law. Imp being Imp he's been calling DeSantis a feminist and DeSimpis ever since.
The state of Missouri is about to commit a high crime against feminism by making it harder for women to deny fathers access to their children, and the whores are pissed. One of the dirty tricks women use to maximize the family court payout is about to become less viable.
Yeah, that's the point you fucking retard. It's about making the dirty tricks you and the whores you represent harder to pull off.
Translation: The false abuse accusations that you advise your female clients to make as a matter course won't be as effective, and you're angry because it reduces their payday and makes it harder for them to torture men now.
Yes, and that standard is completely subjective. Given the anti-male bias in the family courts "best interest of the child" becomes "best interest of the woman" in practice. An objective standard makes this kind of dishonesty harder, which is why the feminists are so pissed.
It sounds like father's rights groups have been making headway, and the bad actors protecting evil whores changed tactics to try to preserve the house of horrors that they've turned the family courts into.
Put another way, 72% of the time they were rewarded for what were most likely false allegations that women routinely use to get the upper hand in family court. The 28% represents cases where the lying was so blatant that even the notoriously corrupt family courts called them on their shit. What would really put this statistic in perspective is how often the fathers lost custody after reporting the mother's abuse of the kids.
I love how worshipping women and demonizing men is the one thing both conservatives and progressives can agree on. I'm starting to think any ideology that demands respect for women is one ultimately about controlling and cucking men
Surprising, but good. 50/50 should be default unless
or
The default should be whoever destroys the family loses custody and has to pay child support, which is women 80% of the time. Still, 50/50 is a massive improvement over the current system that boils down to the best interest of the woman in practice. I just hope the legislature keeps an eye out for feminist attempts to undermine the intent of the new law. We all know that there's no depth they won't sink to to deny the father access and steal as much of his income as possible.
All this option opens up is women winning, because they can just cry a little and its abuse. Helped by the legal definition of abuse being open to basically anything that isn't giving her what she wants. Stop leaving these "common sense" loopholes, because all they do is get widened and themselves abused until the law itself is useless.
Divorce is supposed to be no fault, 50/50 unless abuse in a lot of states. How often does a guy end up with anything except the clothes on his back when he leaves? Probably a lot more than there are abusive guys by a factor.
The default should be whoever is paying/providing for the kids, which is the dads most of the time. Cut the middleman bullshit.
That seems fucked up because then every kid will have two homes -- no home.
When did he say that?
Cool can you provide a source?
He's talking about a law that would have banned lifetime alimony. DeSantis vetoed it over concerns that its retroactive provisions would have constituted an unconstitutional ex post facto law. Imp being Imp he's been calling DeSantis a feminist and DeSimpis ever since.
Sounds about right.