you can legitimately prove some form of abuse was happening
All this option opens up is women winning, because they can just cry a little and its abuse. Helped by the legal definition of abuse being open to basically anything that isn't giving her what she wants. Stop leaving these "common sense" loopholes, because all they do is get widened and themselves abused until the law itself is useless.
Divorce is supposed to be no fault, 50/50 unless abuse in a lot of states. How often does a guy end up with anything except the clothes on his back when he leaves? Probably a lot more than there are abusive guys by a factor.
All this option opens up is women winning, because they can just cry a little and its abuse. Helped by the legal definition of abuse being open to basically anything that isn't giving her what she wants. Stop leaving these "common sense" loopholes, because all they do is get widened and themselves abused until the law itself is useless.
Divorce is supposed to be no fault, 50/50 unless abuse in a lot of states. How often does a guy end up with anything except the clothes on his back when he leaves? Probably a lot more than there are abusive guys by a factor.