If the court finds that the property belongs to the parents, this would bypass Tennessee Public Records law which has determined that the documents are a matter of public interest.
Uh, why would something that be considered relevant for public interest be given to anyone BUT the public?
Is this whole thing as stunningly stupid as I think it is? The families will also see it...when the public sees it. That's why the Public Records law exists.
They're not suing to have the manifesto be public. They're suing to have the manifesto be owned by the family of the shooter who pinky swear they'll give the rights to the victims' families, and neither of them will ever show it to the public.
Frankly, if the above post constitutes a violation of Rule 2, something I like "you should fight back against someone trying to kill you" would also be violating the rule. I hardly think the above "promotes, advocates, glorifies, or endorses violence" especially since it's an generalized, abstract statement, directed at no one in particular ... AND it's a meme.
He sees the way that leftists speak about white people as the exact same thing as the way that the 1488 people talk about minorities, and has been over this multiple times, which is why he enforces the rules the way he does.
However, you can't also support just beating children. Your comment comes across as saying: "it's important to crack your 5 year old's orbital bone if they put on your wife's shoes." You're not even tempering yourself to "bullying should happen", or that "parents should be allowed to use corporal punishments like spankings". Nope: just straight: beat your children.
It's actually self-defense to have others violently force you to stop punching your children.
[Use of force] is the only cure for such degeneracy
A 5 year old trying on their mother's shoes is not "degeneracy". That is a natural curiosity. The degeneracy I was referring to, which I thought was clear, was becoming a troon. I should also think it should be abundantly clear than parents abusing their children to push them into that is NOT the same scenario.
The comment I was replying to:
I wonder if the parents were embarrassed by her trooning out.
While I can somewhat see where you're coming from, but I think that's a bit of a stretch to assume I'm implying "it's important to crack your 5 year old's orbital bone".
Neglecting your child, let alone beating them, is obviously not a preventative solution to them making poor life choices.
You say that, but it's not even the first time it's been said on this sub. Let alone people arguing that mass executions are the explicit solution to all transgenders. Not even transgenderism.
At this point they don't even need to release it, the way they try to weasle their way out of this is speaking volumes as to the content of the manifesto.
So that's why the recent focus on the Idaho killer in Murdoch media. This story is about to blow up in women's shills' faces when it's finally revealed she was feminist.
Edit : They also said him attending feminist rallies wasn't proof he didn't hate women. Foreshadowing.
Uh, why would something that be considered relevant for public interest be given to anyone BUT the public?
Is this whole thing as stunningly stupid as I think it is? The families will also see it...when the public sees it. That's why the Public Records law exists.
They're not suing to have the manifesto be public. They're suing to have the manifesto be owned by the family of the shooter who pinky swear they'll give the rights to the victims' families, and neither of them will ever show it to the public.
All a circus to tire you out.
I wonder if the parents were embarrassed by her trooning out. They should have disowned her instead of letting her be a tranny.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
This isn't reddit. Why are such rules in effect?
Frankly, if the above post constitutes a violation of Rule 2, something I like "you should fight back against someone trying to kill you" would also be violating the rule. I hardly think the above "promotes, advocates, glorifies, or endorses violence" especially since it's an generalized, abstract statement, directed at no one in particular ... AND it's a meme.
He sees the way that leftists speak about white people as the exact same thing as the way that the 1488 people talk about minorities, and has been over this multiple times, which is why he enforces the rules the way he does.
There was no racial component to the original comment?
Redman is correct in one way, that much is true.
However, you can't also support just beating children. Your comment comes across as saying: "it's important to crack your 5 year old's orbital bone if they put on your wife's shoes." You're not even tempering yourself to "bullying should happen", or that "parents should be allowed to use corporal punishments like spankings". Nope: just straight: beat your children.
It's actually self-defense to have others violently force you to stop punching your children.
The original comment was:
A 5 year old trying on their mother's shoes is not "degeneracy". That is a natural curiosity. The degeneracy I was referring to, which I thought was clear, was becoming a troon. I should also think it should be abundantly clear than parents abusing their children to push them into that is NOT the same scenario.
The comment I was replying to:
While I can somewhat see where you're coming from, but I think that's a bit of a stretch to assume I'm implying "it's important to crack your 5 year old's orbital bone".
Because it's not meant to be taken seriously:
https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=beatings+the+cure+for+disorders&first=1
Neglecting your child, let alone beating them, is obviously not a preventative solution to them making poor life choices.
You say that, but it's not even the first time it's been said on this sub. Let alone people arguing that mass executions are the explicit solution to all transgenders. Not even transgenderism.
At this point they don't even need to release it, the way they try to weasle their way out of this is speaking volumes as to the content of the manifesto.
From what was once a joke song about a mass murder Santa Klaus:
"And they say Mrs Klaus, she's on the phone every night,
With her lawyer... Negotiating the movie rights!"
But apparently that's now reality. Criminal action? Lights, camera, action.
Keep your 40, I'll just have an Earl Grey tea.
I'm sorry to hear about their upcoming suicide by three shots to the back of the head.
So that's why the recent focus on the Idaho killer in Murdoch media. This story is about to blow up in women's shills' faces when it's finally revealed she was feminist.
Edit : They also said him attending feminist rallies wasn't proof he didn't hate women. Foreshadowing.