Frankly, if the above post constitutes a violation of Rule 2, something I like "you should fight back against someone trying to kill you" would also be violating the rule. I hardly think the above "promotes, advocates, glorifies, or endorses violence" especially since it's an generalized, abstract statement, directed at no one in particular ... AND it's a meme.
He sees the way that leftists speak about white people as the exact same thing as the way that the 1488 people talk about minorities, and has been over this multiple times, which is why he enforces the rules the way he does.
However, you can't also support just beating children. Your comment comes across as saying: "it's important to crack your 5 year old's orbital bone if they put on your wife's shoes." You're not even tempering yourself to "bullying should happen", or that "parents should be allowed to use corporal punishments like spankings". Nope: just straight: beat your children.
It's actually self-defense to have others violently force you to stop punching your children.
[Use of force] is the only cure for such degeneracy
A 5 year old trying on their mother's shoes is not "degeneracy". That is a natural curiosity. The degeneracy I was referring to, which I thought was clear, was becoming a troon. I should also think it should be abundantly clear than parents abusing their children to push them into that is NOT the same scenario.
The comment I was replying to:
I wonder if the parents were embarrassed by her trooning out.
While I can somewhat see where you're coming from, but I think that's a bit of a stretch to assume I'm implying "it's important to crack your 5 year old's orbital bone".
Neglecting your child, let alone beating them, is obviously not a preventative solution to them making poor life choices.
You say that, but it's not even the first time it's been said on this sub. Let alone people arguing that mass executions are the explicit solution to all transgenders. Not even transgenderism.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
This isn't reddit. Why are such rules in effect?
Frankly, if the above post constitutes a violation of Rule 2, something I like "you should fight back against someone trying to kill you" would also be violating the rule. I hardly think the above "promotes, advocates, glorifies, or endorses violence" especially since it's an generalized, abstract statement, directed at no one in particular ... AND it's a meme.
He sees the way that leftists speak about white people as the exact same thing as the way that the 1488 people talk about minorities, and has been over this multiple times, which is why he enforces the rules the way he does.
There was no racial component to the original comment?
Redman is correct in one way, that much is true.
However, you can't also support just beating children. Your comment comes across as saying: "it's important to crack your 5 year old's orbital bone if they put on your wife's shoes." You're not even tempering yourself to "bullying should happen", or that "parents should be allowed to use corporal punishments like spankings". Nope: just straight: beat your children.
It's actually self-defense to have others violently force you to stop punching your children.
The original comment was:
A 5 year old trying on their mother's shoes is not "degeneracy". That is a natural curiosity. The degeneracy I was referring to, which I thought was clear, was becoming a troon. I should also think it should be abundantly clear than parents abusing their children to push them into that is NOT the same scenario.
The comment I was replying to:
While I can somewhat see where you're coming from, but I think that's a bit of a stretch to assume I'm implying "it's important to crack your 5 year old's orbital bone".
Because it's not meant to be taken seriously:
https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=beatings+the+cure+for+disorders&first=1
Neglecting your child, let alone beating them, is obviously not a preventative solution to them making poor life choices.
You say that, but it's not even the first time it's been said on this sub. Let alone people arguing that mass executions are the explicit solution to all transgenders. Not even transgenderism.