"Debate" hasn't existed in at least a decade, if not longer. Modern debate consists of two people shitting out as many bad yet short arguments as possible in hopes that they talked faster than the other guy. That's it. No actual conversation is had, just metagaming the points system.
But it can't happen because the internet has divided people into those who research and those who repeat.
So any actual debate is now between an informed, rational side and an ignorant irrational one, for example is mainstream media trustworthy, whereas classically the debate was over which side had a better argument not which had one at all.
It's actually unrelated to that. Spreading aka gish gallop is just the dominant strategy in the main competitive debate ruleset. If your opponent doesn't rebut a point you make, you win that point. So, just speak as quickly as possible and make hundreds of bunk points so your opponent can't rebut them all.
Far worse than that. Spreading involves speaking more quickly than most intelligent people can even interpret as language. Destiny at least enunciates enough to have his words understood.
This is news? Internet Aristocrat had a video over 10 years ago showing that winners of 'debating' tournaments made arguments such as "YAAAH YAAAH NIGGA! PRESIDENTIAL WAR POWERS SHOULD NOT BE PUSED AGAINST NIGGERS!"
How much do morons pay to have their heads filled with nonsense? Quite a lot. It costs 1200 dollars for the great privilege of being 'educated' by a guy with such logic that he sliced off his own balls. For 40 hours.
Before anything else, including being a debate judge, I am a Marxist-Leninist-Maoist.
I'm a Maoist as well, at least on the issue of transgenderism, because Chairman Mao was right about transgenderism.
Sad but not surprising, that's the way with things now. High school students that start to think for themselves, you have to nip that in the bud. Aggressively. No one must grow up with any thought other than to absorb and regurgitate the approved message.
In general, students voluntarily, and mutually, disclose their evidence to their opponents before the debate round, as both teams benefit from spending more time with the other team’s evidence.
But X Braithwaite, who’s judged 169 debate rounds with 340 students, has her own disclosure policy in her paradigm, which uses a racial epithet: “1. Ns don’t have to disclose to you. 2. Disclose to ns.”
Debate Judge Kriti Sharma concurs: under her list of “Things That Will Cause You To Automatically Lose,” number three is “Referring to immigrants as ‘illegal.’ ”
How about "people whose presence in the United States violates federal law"? Doesn't quite roll off the tongue, does it?
They are objectively illegal immigrants because they are here illegally. Shawarma chick's bias is trash and flies in the face of common sense.
"Lila Lavender" set off my tranny detector and if you check his Tabroom page it confirms it (I know, a layup when combined with all the Marxist-Leninist-Maoist shit). There is a bunch of even crazier stuff in there than what made the article.
I am a transgender woman who has a deeper voice, please take that into account. It's exhausting to see judges and debaters who are unable to resolve this contradiction, either attribute my RFD to men on the panel, or treat me like a man as a result of my voice.
"Debate" hasn't existed in at least a decade, if not longer. Modern debate consists of two people shitting out as many bad yet short arguments as possible in hopes that they talked faster than the other guy. That's it. No actual conversation is had, just metagaming the points system.
I think the magic word is 'can', not that it's likely.
But it can't happen because the internet has divided people into those who research and those who repeat.
So any actual debate is now between an informed, rational side and an ignorant irrational one, for example is mainstream media trustworthy, whereas classically the debate was over which side had a better argument not which had one at all.
I liked it when Gavin McInnes debated Destiny.
Gavin's main argument was that Destiny was a cuck.
It's actually unrelated to that. Spreading aka gish gallop is just the dominant strategy in the main competitive debate ruleset. If your opponent doesn't rebut a point you make, you win that point. So, just speak as quickly as possible and make hundreds of bunk points so your opponent can't rebut them all.
Far worse than that. Spreading involves speaking more quickly than most intelligent people can even interpret as language. Destiny at least enunciates enough to have his words understood.
Sure, but this seems like a clear escalation of that problem.
This is news? Internet Aristocrat had a video over 10 years ago showing that winners of 'debating' tournaments made arguments such as "YAAAH YAAAH NIGGA! PRESIDENTIAL WAR POWERS SHOULD NOT BE PUSED AGAINST NIGGERS!"
Oh, and this creature talked about? The name was Lila Lavender. Of course, you immediately know what's up. This is what he looks like. He is a debating coach.
How much do morons pay to have their heads filled with nonsense? Quite a lot. It costs 1200 dollars for the great privilege of being 'educated' by a guy with such logic that he sliced off his own balls. For 40 hours.
I'm a Maoist as well, at least on the issue of transgenderism, because Chairman Mao was right about transgenderism.
Sad but not surprising, that's the way with things now. High school students that start to think for themselves, you have to nip that in the bud. Aggressively. No one must grow up with any thought other than to absorb and regurgitate the approved message.
Is this real??
I actually thought this was a legit article. Sounds like a policy a high school would institute.
Where are you getting that it's fake?
Not having heard of something being all it takes to dismiss it as fake is a great way to paint yourself into a corner. The sources are provided and you can look stuff up yourself. https://www.tabroom.com/index/paradigm.mhtml?judge_person_id=114657
It's the site Bari Weiss founded after leaving the NYT.
How about "people whose presence in the United States violates federal law"? Doesn't quite roll off the tongue, does it?
They are objectively illegal immigrants because they are here illegally. Shawarma chick's bias is trash and flies in the face of common sense.
"Lila Lavender" set off my tranny detector and if you check his Tabroom page it confirms it (I know, a layup when combined with all the Marxist-Leninist-Maoist shit). There is a bunch of even crazier stuff in there than what made the article.
https://archive.is/gQ7nw
Just quit. Let the echo chamber chime, in splendid isolation.
If a high school debate thing pulls this crap torch the school.
"Debate" American Style: Our Top Orators in Action
your topic is debating presidential war powers... you have 2 minutes...
what the fuck is this shit? this is not debate.
Based on the Israel bit , might be for the wrong reasons but still lmao