There is no rule violating commentary in the video or tweet.
If someone other than a jewish organization were to make these claims, wouldn't that count as demarking jews as 'conspiring,' per rule 16? Anyone other than a jewish group themselves pointing out that jews are counting coup over the successes of civil rights movements would be considered an attack on jewish identity, correct?
Per our prior exchanges, I understand why you draw and police this line.
I don't approve, but I understand your motives and unenviable position as a moderator trying to keep the forum civil.
If someone other than a jewish organization were to make these claims, wouldn't that count as demarking jews as 'conspiring,' per rule 16?
If a Rabbi came on and said that jews, as a racial cabal went out to destroy other nations outlined in Judeo-Bolshevist rhetoric, I would absolutely remove that post. I have removed posts like that where some fringe rabbi was saying that the jews deserved the holocaust.
Anyone other than a jewish group themselves pointing out that jews are counting coup over the successes of civil rights movements would be considered an attack on jewish identity, correct?
No.
The issue is not if there are jews present in some movement, the issue is why.
For example blacks have also been present in every civil rights movement. This is not because there is a black racial conspiracy to undermine all nations and bring about black-bolshevism which will destroy civilization. The New English Protestants have also been involved in all civil rights movements. Again, this is not a protestant religious cabal to destroy civilization and kill nations.
Disparity is not evidence of discrimination. The issue is the discrimination. The presence of jews means nothing. It's when you are asserting that the presence of jews is the evidence of a racial cabal. That is the line.
Hence why, despite claims to the opposite by local stormfags, calling someone a jew, or identifying someone as a jew is not an issue. Saying that they are jewish to indicate that they are part of a racial cabal is the issue.
OP didn't violate any rules here because all he did was re-iterate what a bunch of jewish racialists want to emphasize for their Leftist credentials, as they use jewish people as a shield for criticism against their Leftism. The racialists themselves are not admitting to a racial cabal.
And yes, all the same things go for non-jews. White racial cabals still violate Rule 16, and a bunch of white people admitting that they are part of the White Supremacist Cisheteronormative Patriarchy cabal would violate that. But since nobody on here believes that, I don't get to remove those posts. Instead we get videos of crazy white Leftists explicitly saying that, and then making fun of them. Accusations of world-wide racial cabals deserve to be mocked, and that is our fundamental basis, because Kotaku was absolutely doing that.
All in all, I also don't see any jews claiming that they have coup'd any races in this video either.
All in all, I also don't see any jews claiming that they have coup'd any races in this video either.
They aren't counting coup against a race explicitly. They are claiming participation as jews on behalf of each intersectional element's victory against western society, which is (per intersectionalist ideology) implicitly understood as cis-hetrosexual white male Christian patriarchy, or are you claiming not to understand that?
I'm explicitly stating that "civil rights" is not an explicitly intersectional ideology, that the participation of jews in movements is not evidence of a racial cabal, and that being wrong-headed is not the same as conspiring to destroy western subversion.
For example, I find zero evidence that Ronald Reagan or Barry Goldwater wanted the the utter annihilation of western civilization. I will not cite this as evidence that the white race is operating a white racial cabal to destroy western civilization, nor will I claim that they were seeking the annihilation of western civilization as supporters of the Civil Rights movement, even when both had that very movement turn against them.
Intersectionality was also invented far later than any part of the Civil Rights movement.
If someone other than a jewish organization were to make these claims, wouldn't that count as demarking jews as 'conspiring'
Not really. It's the further step that they take, by saying that "Jews are always undermining their host societies" that does that.
The fact that many Jewish activists were involved in these causes, and that they are disproportionately active in them, is not controversial. The further step of claiming that an entire ethnic group is bad based on an infinitesimal number does it.
I don't approve, but I understand your motives and unenviable position as a moderator trying to keep the forum civil.
There are more important reasons than keeping things 'civil'.
The fact that many Jewish activists were involved in these causes, and that they are disproportionately active in them, is not controversial. The further step of claiming that an entire ethnic group is bad based on an infinitesimal number does it.
Can you show me the meaningful difference between those cases? If you have a significant Jewish elite in your nation then you end up with communist agitation no matter how you slice it.
Are you worried about people persecuting individual Jews on this forum or elsewhere?
He can tell you that Jews are disproportionately represented in leftist movements and leadership, and he can tell you that Jews survive via strong community and in-group biases, but he can’t connect these two dots and declare the possibility of an inherently problematic demographic.
Because collectivism is a parasitic leftist ideological failing, that leads midwits to utter insanity. The inability to recognize individuality makes the collectivists themselves irrational to the point of being subhuman.
Some X people bad - all X is this! Makes the person saying it retarded.
But, why did the video get cropped? You probably could have just linked it from their website.
Videos often show up cropped for me on this website unless I click on show in new tab wherein the video file is opened directly. Not that you are the right person to complain about it to; just sayin.
Just for you, Telia: Post Approved.
There is no rule violating commentary in the video or tweet.
But, why did the video get cropped? You probably could have just linked it from their website.
If someone other than a jewish organization were to make these claims, wouldn't that count as demarking jews as 'conspiring,' per rule 16? Anyone other than a jewish group themselves pointing out that jews are counting coup over the successes of civil rights movements would be considered an attack on jewish identity, correct?
Per our prior exchanges, I understand why you draw and police this line.
I don't approve, but I understand your motives and unenviable position as a moderator trying to keep the forum civil.
If a Rabbi came on and said that jews, as a racial cabal went out to destroy other nations outlined in Judeo-Bolshevist rhetoric, I would absolutely remove that post. I have removed posts like that where some fringe rabbi was saying that the jews deserved the holocaust.
No.
The issue is not if there are jews present in some movement, the issue is why.
For example blacks have also been present in every civil rights movement. This is not because there is a black racial conspiracy to undermine all nations and bring about black-bolshevism which will destroy civilization. The New English Protestants have also been involved in all civil rights movements. Again, this is not a protestant religious cabal to destroy civilization and kill nations.
Disparity is not evidence of discrimination. The issue is the discrimination. The presence of jews means nothing. It's when you are asserting that the presence of jews is the evidence of a racial cabal. That is the line.
Hence why, despite claims to the opposite by local stormfags, calling someone a jew, or identifying someone as a jew is not an issue. Saying that they are jewish to indicate that they are part of a racial cabal is the issue.
OP didn't violate any rules here because all he did was re-iterate what a bunch of jewish racialists want to emphasize for their Leftist credentials, as they use jewish people as a shield for criticism against their Leftism. The racialists themselves are not admitting to a racial cabal.
And yes, all the same things go for non-jews. White racial cabals still violate Rule 16, and a bunch of white people admitting that they are part of the White Supremacist Cisheteronormative Patriarchy cabal would violate that. But since nobody on here believes that, I don't get to remove those posts. Instead we get videos of crazy white Leftists explicitly saying that, and then making fun of them. Accusations of world-wide racial cabals deserve to be mocked, and that is our fundamental basis, because Kotaku was absolutely doing that.
All in all, I also don't see any jews claiming that they have coup'd any races in this video either.
They aren't counting coup against a race explicitly. They are claiming participation as jews on behalf of each intersectional element's victory against western society, which is (per intersectionalist ideology) implicitly understood as cis-hetrosexual white male Christian patriarchy, or are you claiming not to understand that?
I'm explicitly stating that "civil rights" is not an explicitly intersectional ideology, that the participation of jews in movements is not evidence of a racial cabal, and that being wrong-headed is not the same as conspiring to destroy western subversion.
For example, I find zero evidence that Ronald Reagan or Barry Goldwater wanted the the utter annihilation of western civilization. I will not cite this as evidence that the white race is operating a white racial cabal to destroy western civilization, nor will I claim that they were seeking the annihilation of western civilization as supporters of the Civil Rights movement, even when both had that very movement turn against them.
Intersectionality was also invented far later than any part of the Civil Rights movement.
Blah blah blah you are so fucking annoying.
Not really. It's the further step that they take, by saying that "Jews are always undermining their host societies" that does that.
The fact that many Jewish activists were involved in these causes, and that they are disproportionately active in them, is not controversial. The further step of claiming that an entire ethnic group is bad based on an infinitesimal number does it.
There are more important reasons than keeping things 'civil'.
Can you show me the meaningful difference between those cases? If you have a significant Jewish elite in your nation then you end up with communist agitation no matter how you slice it.
Are you worried about people persecuting individual Jews on this forum or elsewhere?
He can tell you that Jews are disproportionately represented in leftist movements and leadership, and he can tell you that Jews survive via strong community and in-group biases, but he can’t connect these two dots and declare the possibility of an inherently problematic demographic.
Because collectivism is a parasitic leftist ideological failing, that leads midwits to utter insanity. The inability to recognize individuality makes the collectivists themselves irrational to the point of being subhuman.
Some X people bad - all X is this! Makes the person saying it retarded.
I don't see much of a difference between elites who are Jewish, and those who are not. Both are rotten to the core.
No, more that the place will be turned into another Stormfront that no one wants to join.
Wow so gracious of you to approve our speech
keep it kosher
As if you would tolerate the reverse.
Videos often show up cropped for me on this website unless I click on show in new tab wherein the video file is opened directly. Not that you are the right person to complain about it to; just sayin.
Well, at least I know about it now.