You do know most of those lockdowns, curfews, etc. were initially issued prior to the 2020 election, yes? And are you going to sit there and tell me to my face that Trump would have, had he been re-elected, tried to force the Democrat governors to reverse their mandates when we've got an active thread on here from 4 hrs before your post about Trump claiming Cuomo did a better job than DeSantis?
Honestly yes. Trump was much more amenable to lifting lockdowns because it was something his constituents were pressuring him on.
You're an idiot if you think that the lockdowns would have been lifted in the same time frame or longer than Joe Biden. We certainly wouldn't have had Trump ordering mandates on the military via executive order despite the Justice Department telling him they were unconstitutional.
Probably one of the best things about Trump was that he was responsive to his voters. Even if he took the wrong initial step, when he got hit with actual pressure, he'd normally re-orient.
When we don't see that is typically because right-wing institutions misrepresented our interests: as we saw with the NRA's support of the bumpstock ban.
"Tell you"? no. But I will assert both-and rather than either-or. I don't think in black and white. And I don't think Trump is God. He's just - it seems - the only mostly-good guy on the world stage, at present. He'd have done better; but he didn't because he stepped down.
That's when it usually happens. When peacetime people become so laid back that they don't consider that leaders may actively be trying to destroy their freedoms and enslave them to the system of government.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, public trials are an absolute necessity because I want every dipshit normie who followed these guidelines and ridiculed everyone who didn't to be deeply ashamed of themselves; like suicidal level ashamed
Would you look at that amazingly prompt response to the 2020 lockdowns. Just two years late to do anything about any of it.
Acting after the fact doesn't mean a whole lot for the (at minimum) hundreds of thousands of people who lost their jobs or had their rights infringed upon in the moment.
Statists will still worship the checks and balances as if that wasn't what explicitly enabled this shit to happen, with officials knowing that it would take years before anyone would ever respond to their actions, at which time they could be sitting pretty with their revisionism of the events that most people will buy without a second thought.
Governors literally became dictators. Literally. They simply passed edicts without legislative or judicial review and had the police enforce it. Even limp-dick RINO's like Mike DeWine (Ohio Governor) established mass travel embargos, random police detentions, and state wide curfews.
And yeah, he literally did say that the police could pull you over, question you, and then fine you if they didn't feel your excuse for travel was good enough.
And this is just for the lockdowns, it doesn't even account for the poison distributed under the guise of medicine.
We may be living through the single most damaging incident in all of human history.
And you enabled it, Gorsuchbechev... when you ruled "no standing" to Texas' constitutional challenge of the Nov.3.2020 Biden coup.
Get stuft with hot hell pokers.
You do know most of those lockdowns, curfews, etc. were initially issued prior to the 2020 election, yes? And are you going to sit there and tell me to my face that Trump would have, had he been re-elected, tried to force the Democrat governors to reverse their mandates when we've got an active thread on here from 4 hrs before your post about Trump claiming Cuomo did a better job than DeSantis?
Honestly yes. Trump was much more amenable to lifting lockdowns because it was something his constituents were pressuring him on.
You're an idiot if you think that the lockdowns would have been lifted in the same time frame or longer than Joe Biden. We certainly wouldn't have had Trump ordering mandates on the military via executive order despite the Justice Department telling him they were unconstitutional.
Probably so.
One admirable trait of Trump's is his responsiveness to his base.
Probably one of the best things about Trump was that he was responsive to his voters. Even if he took the wrong initial step, when he got hit with actual pressure, he'd normally re-orient.
When we don't see that is typically because right-wing institutions misrepresented our interests: as we saw with the NRA's support of the bumpstock ban.
"Tell you"? no. But I will assert both-and rather than either-or. I don't think in black and white. And I don't think Trump is God. He's just - it seems - the only mostly-good guy on the world stage, at present. He'd have done better; but he didn't because he stepped down.
That's when it usually happens. When peacetime people become so laid back that they don't consider that leaders may actively be trying to destroy their freedoms and enslave them to the system of government.
Yeah, I know. So when do the hangings start? After trials, of course, we wouldn't want to be uncivilized, now, would we.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, public trials are an absolute necessity because I want every dipshit normie who followed these guidelines and ridiculed everyone who didn't to be deeply ashamed of themselves; like suicidal level ashamed
In your dreams.
Too many people (normies) are either completely ignorant or follow the lead of TV talking heads.
MAYBE we'll see some reprisals if either Trump or RFK Jr wins the White House next year.
Would you look at that amazingly prompt response to the 2020 lockdowns. Just two years late to do anything about any of it.
Acting after the fact doesn't mean a whole lot for the (at minimum) hundreds of thousands of people who lost their jobs or had their rights infringed upon in the moment.
Statists will still worship the checks and balances as if that wasn't what explicitly enabled this shit to happen, with officials knowing that it would take years before anyone would ever respond to their actions, at which time they could be sitting pretty with their revisionism of the events that most people will buy without a second thought.
It's fine, just say you were Just Following Orders™ and it's all water under the bridge.
And absolutely none of them are going to face repercussions! Yay!
No shit retard.
Governors literally became dictators. Literally. They simply passed edicts without legislative or judicial review and had the police enforce it. Even limp-dick RINO's like Mike DeWine (Ohio Governor) established mass travel embargos, random police detentions, and state wide curfews.
And yeah, he literally did say that the police could pull you over, question you, and then fine you if they didn't feel your excuse for travel was good enough.
When will the efforts of the USG to create a ministry of information be hauled before the court as a violation of the First Amendment?
Never, because the Pentagon is going all in for information warfare.