Yup. Tradcon = title 9 is a waste of money. It claims to be anti-discrimination but what it actually is is a discriminatory subsidy in favor of women's sports that would not be viable on their own merits.
Title IX was enacted in 1972, and trad is by definition older than that.
This reeks of democrats terminology from the 80s, so tradcon. If I’m guessing correctly this is the new republican led bill to “protect female sports” instead of doing the more important things like gutting federal funding to useless programs, gutting foreign funding, and destroying any authority of the 4th branch of government. A man can dream…
You call it "tradcon" but the traditional stance would be "women don't need to play sports".
Yup. Tradcon = title 9 is a waste of money. It claims to be anti-discrimination but what it actually is is a discriminatory subsidy in favor of women's sports that would not be viable on their own merits.
Title IX was enacted in 1972, and trad is by definition older than that.
Because more than half the voters are women so you need their vote. Why do you think the democrats push abortion shit so hard?
Traditionalist here. We'd abolish title 9 and ban most women from higher education.
That's how you do it instead of getting involved in the retarded civil war between the TERFs and trannies.
Nah fuck trannies and terfs.
Who cares, they're pointing the right direction.
This reeks of democrats terminology from the 80s, so tradcon. If I’m guessing correctly this is the new republican led bill to “protect female sports” instead of doing the more important things like gutting federal funding to useless programs, gutting foreign funding, and destroying any authority of the 4th branch of government. A man can dream…
I'm guessing tradcon simply because of the context in which the word 'dominance' is used.
A radfem would only want to frame male dominance as a negative fault of men. Male dominance in sport is of course a result of the superiority of men.