I'll be really blunt and honest here. Women stopped cooking my meals, stopped cleaning my house, they stopped sucking my dick without exorbitant amounts of effort and the women all got fat and ugly too. Why the fuck would I care what is going on with women? The worse it gets for women, the better it'll be for me in the end.
She's somewhat correct. It's obvious that many demoralized, insecure white boys do get drawn into transgenderism because it gives them a victim class identity to build their lives around. That's certainly the most reasonable interpretation for why so many white girls identify as LGBT also. It's just bizarre how these female bigots (who themselves irrationally identify as a victim class and created the whole movement) somehow blame men for this when the only people not explicitly voting for and pushing this shit in vast majorities are white men.
Pulling the strings of people like Riley to keep the distraction running while they build up their corporate contacts, using ESG to deny men work and bail out women at failing companies.
Because she's far too dumb to know what she's doing on her own and manipulate people to this extent. Likely has a script-writer for her public appearances.
Zelensky is the same, he has Olena Zelenska, a script-writer, as his wife. He's an actor, they're dumb as fuck.
The second society invited direct competition between men and women, we completely disincentivised strong men.
And I don't just mean trannies in women's sports, I mean there are men trying to be the greatest physical athlete, and women trying to be the greatest physical athlete; simply having the same goal is the problem.
Women don't like to lose, and they like the person who beat them even less. Where are the female athletes who are impressed by how badly they're outclassed by mid-tier male athletes? Are those guys getting laid? Nope, it's "not fair" and they're "oppressors".
If a man brags to a woman that he's ranked higher than other men, she's impressed. If he's ranked higher than men and women, she's jealous because, theoretically, she is a potential competitor in whatever field this is and he's not a Chad , he's an incel loser who enjoys dominating women.
This absolutely extends to the work force.
If a man is competing with a woman for promotions and raises, he's either a total loser who's getting beat by a women, or he's a threat, or even an obstacle. It's a factor of the rise in sexual harassement; no woman in the workforce is a potential sexual partner because they are in competition with you. If they make themselves sexually receptive, it's probably a trap.
So, knowing that a huge part of male competitiveness is ranking themselves for women (cause we're seen how women pick men; no thanks): what's the point of strong men if it just makes them antagonistic to women?
Sure there are other reasons for men to be strong, and there are still strong men, but they want nothing to do with women in general.
individual sports where women are judged, mostly by men, like figure skating, gymnastics, diving are fine
directly competitive sports like swimming or track are pushing it but whatever
team sports for women are ludicrous and should never have any kind of social prominence
of course we can't fix this until anti-reality legislation like title IX is repealed, that can't happen as long as women can vote, therefore the collapse is inevitable
Title IX does not defend women's sports, it defends their right to an education. Sports are an extra-curricular activity that nobody has to fund for them.
It’s because like usual Imp is wrong. Title IX does apply to sports. If the school receives federal funding and funds athletics programs then they can run afoul of title IX. It doesn’t mean the same sport has to be offered to men or women but if the school is funding 5 male sports there must also be 5 female sports being funded by the school. So it doesn’t require the school to field a female American football team, but they may have a women’s field hockey or volleyball team without a male equivalent team since there is likely a male American football team. It also doesn’t matter that men’s football, basketball, baseball, and hockey can bring in way more money for the school than what they spend on it while most women’s teams don’t even come close to breaking even. They have to offer the same number, so the men’s teams have to subsidize the female sports usually in the athletics budget.
The federal funds are not necessarily going to their sports programs and are likely not. The rule applies if the school is receiving federal funds at all. Even if the school has the money ear marked for research or classroom upkeep. If they have accepted federal funding then title IX applies to everything. Most athletic programs at the college level are funded by booster clubs/alumni programs. And the money making sports really function as a marketing arm for the university. You will see a ton of people wearing licensed clothing of whatever dominant school in the surrounding areas of the university who have never set foot in a classroom and likely never been on it campus.
IMO, it's "Education (program or activity)" because nothing else makes sense.
Reading it the other way would mean any campus activity would have to let women in, and I don't see frats advertising letting women join. It also wouldn't be logical for the government to waste time on policing extra-curricular activities.
Can someone bring in the SCOTUS and ask them what it's supposed to say?
If she added "liberal" it would have come across better. The only so called conservative playing dress up is Bruce Jenner, and he's called for guys to stop playing women's sports
The strong men are watching and eating popcorn with a shit-eating grin while you get your face kicked in, darling.
Women brought this upon themselves, welcome to equality ladies
On a related note, anyone know when the next Fallon Fox UFC fight is?
I'll be really blunt and honest here. Women stopped cooking my meals, stopped cleaning my house, they stopped sucking my dick without exorbitant amounts of effort and the women all got fat and ugly too. Why the fuck would I care what is going on with women? The worse it gets for women, the better it'll be for me in the end.
You know, it is kind of insane watching people as stupid as this get national spotlights.
Where are all the smart women?
She's somewhat correct. It's obvious that many demoralized, insecure white boys do get drawn into transgenderism because it gives them a victim class identity to build their lives around. That's certainly the most reasonable interpretation for why so many white girls identify as LGBT also. It's just bizarre how these female bigots (who themselves irrationally identify as a victim class and created the whole movement) somehow blame men for this when the only people not explicitly voting for and pushing this shit in vast majorities are white men.
Pulling the strings of people like Riley to keep the distraction running while they build up their corporate contacts, using ESG to deny men work and bail out women at failing companies.
Wait, I thought that all women were just born evil? Why would someone need to pull Riley's strings if she's got an innate desire to destroy men?
Because she's far too dumb to know what she's doing on her own and manipulate people to this extent. Likely has a script-writer for her public appearances.
Zelensky is the same, he has Olena Zelenska, a script-writer, as his wife. He's an actor, they're dumb as fuck.
She's an "athlete", they aren't smart either.
I love how she asks where the strong men are after chastising men.
Bitch is getting what she and her kind deserve.
>a way for white males to finally become a marginalized group
>become
lol
Why are the strong women?
The second society invited direct competition between men and women, we completely disincentivised strong men.
And I don't just mean trannies in women's sports, I mean there are men trying to be the greatest physical athlete, and women trying to be the greatest physical athlete; simply having the same goal is the problem.
Women don't like to lose, and they like the person who beat them even less. Where are the female athletes who are impressed by how badly they're outclassed by mid-tier male athletes? Are those guys getting laid? Nope, it's "not fair" and they're "oppressors".
If a man brags to a woman that he's ranked higher than other men, she's impressed. If he's ranked higher than men and women, she's jealous because, theoretically, she is a potential competitor in whatever field this is and he's not a Chad , he's an incel loser who enjoys dominating women.
This absolutely extends to the work force.
If a man is competing with a woman for promotions and raises, he's either a total loser who's getting beat by a women, or he's a threat, or even an obstacle. It's a factor of the rise in sexual harassement; no woman in the workforce is a potential sexual partner because they are in competition with you. If they make themselves sexually receptive, it's probably a trap.
So, knowing that a huge part of male competitiveness is ranking themselves for women (cause we're seen how women pick men; no thanks): what's the point of strong men if it just makes them antagonistic to women?
Sure there are other reasons for men to be strong, and there are still strong men, but they want nothing to do with women in general.
white men are the ONLY marginalized group.
individual sports where women are judged, mostly by men, like figure skating, gymnastics, diving are fine
directly competitive sports like swimming or track are pushing it but whatever
team sports for women are ludicrous and should never have any kind of social prominence
of course we can't fix this until anti-reality legislation like title IX is repealed, that can't happen as long as women can vote, therefore the collapse is inevitable
Title IX does not defend women's sports, it defends their right to an education. Sports are an extra-curricular activity that nobody has to fund for them.
It’s because like usual Imp is wrong. Title IX does apply to sports. If the school receives federal funding and funds athletics programs then they can run afoul of title IX. It doesn’t mean the same sport has to be offered to men or women but if the school is funding 5 male sports there must also be 5 female sports being funded by the school. So it doesn’t require the school to field a female American football team, but they may have a women’s field hockey or volleyball team without a male equivalent team since there is likely a male American football team. It also doesn’t matter that men’s football, basketball, baseball, and hockey can bring in way more money for the school than what they spend on it while most women’s teams don’t even come close to breaking even. They have to offer the same number, so the men’s teams have to subsidize the female sports usually in the athletics budget.
The federal funds are not necessarily going to their sports programs and are likely not. The rule applies if the school is receiving federal funds at all. Even if the school has the money ear marked for research or classroom upkeep. If they have accepted federal funding then title IX applies to everything. Most athletic programs at the college level are funded by booster clubs/alumni programs. And the money making sports really function as a marketing arm for the university. You will see a ton of people wearing licensed clothing of whatever dominant school in the surrounding areas of the university who have never set foot in a classroom and likely never been on it campus.
IMO, it's "Education (program or activity)" because nothing else makes sense.
Reading it the other way would mean any campus activity would have to let women in, and I don't see frats advertising letting women join. It also wouldn't be logical for the government to waste time on policing extra-curricular activities.
Can someone bring in the SCOTUS and ask them what it's supposed to say?
The institutions that allow them to exist do.
If she added "liberal" it would have come across better. The only so called conservative playing dress up is Bruce Jenner, and he's called for guys to stop playing women's sports
The first part is right. She can fuck right off with the second part. And I hate the fact I agree with anything Imp says. Fuck.
The first step is admitting I'm right.
Dumb slut
She ain't wrong. About white guys that go tranny to get privilege.
Yep. It's people with all black identities trying to claim a red
Archive Link
I don't think anything can put into words how much of a gaslight this really is.