If the charges land before a leftist judge, it doesn’t matter. If the decision goes to a leftist jury, it doesn’t matter.
In Minnesota, they had a radical leftist jury with literal BLM activists for the Chauvin trial. They convicted him in just a few hours. All of the jurors claimed to be more politically moderate and impartial during their interviews because that’s how you get on juries. Then they shamelessly voted their politics. Same thing happened with OJ Simpson.
This is the most important part, we already have the judge being a leftist and the jury coming in should immediately be dismissed on political voting grounds but won’t
For all the talk of "jury nullification", the inverse is also true. There's nothing to stop a jury from finding an innocent person guilty if they so desire.
Isn't that a good way to ensure a re-trial though? I don't know enough about the specifics of law to know for certain, but that seems like a surefire way for an appeal to get granted for a re-trial.
A retrial would be double-jeopardy if the judge enters a verdict after throwing out the jury verdict. Maybe you are thinking of a judge dismissing the case because the jury was tainted, which they can also do. Then you can have a retrial.
It's 100% legal to pay someone to not make negative statements about you. Things like non-disparagement clauses are standard in all settlement contracts.
And they must realize this, right? What's the point of throwing a bunch of weak charges against him and basically proving him right about systemic interference?
Do they just think they control the courts at this point and can drag this into the nominations? Or are they intentionally trying to boost him for some reason?
I think there was effectively no cheating in 2016 I think they bought their own bullshit so hard that they thought they didn't have to. That's why they cheated so hard in 2020
Donald Trump intended to, “influence the 2016 presidential election by identifying and purchasing negative information about him to suppress its publication and benefit the Defendant’s electoral prospects.
If the charges land before a leftist judge, it doesn’t matter. If the decision goes to a leftist jury, it doesn’t matter.
In Minnesota, they had a radical leftist jury with literal BLM activists for the Chauvin trial. They convicted him in just a few hours. All of the jurors claimed to be more politically moderate and impartial during their interviews because that’s how you get on juries. Then they shamelessly voted their politics. Same thing happened with OJ Simpson.
Law and order are dead in blue counties.
This is the most important part, we already have the judge being a leftist and the jury coming in should immediately be dismissed on political voting grounds but won’t
For all the talk of "jury nullification", the inverse is also true. There's nothing to stop a jury from finding an innocent person guilty if they so desire.
There kind of is. The judge can throw out a jury conviction if he wants to.
They almost never do, but there was talk of the Rittenhouse judge maybe doing that if the jury convicted since it was so obviously self-defense.
Isn't that a good way to ensure a re-trial though? I don't know enough about the specifics of law to know for certain, but that seems like a surefire way for an appeal to get granted for a re-trial.
A retrial would be double-jeopardy if the judge enters a verdict after throwing out the jury verdict. Maybe you are thinking of a judge dismissing the case because the jury was tainted, which they can also do. Then you can have a retrial.
Nah, it wasn't what I was thinking, just not super knowledgeable about the finer details of US legal proceedings. But thanks for the information.
Its a leftist judge for sure. Judge's daughter worked on Cackles' campaign.
One of the Chauvin jurors actually bragged about blm if I remember correctly. I honestly hope he gets his trial reviewed someday.
It's 100% legal to pay someone to not make negative statements about you. Things like non-disparagement clauses are standard in all settlement contracts.
Not only fake, ineffective.
He went up 26 points on a poll, over De Santis, after the charges came in.
And they must realize this, right? What's the point of throwing a bunch of weak charges against him and basically proving him right about systemic interference?
Do they just think they control the courts at this point and can drag this into the nominations? Or are they intentionally trying to boost him for some reason?
Lefties and people on the right with TDS believe that Trump can never win, so they're going to boost him to be the nominee.
Apparently they forgot that that's the exact same mindset they had in 2016 when he won, but this time the lefties will be cheating.
I think there was effectively no cheating in 2016 I think they bought their own bullshit so hard that they thought they didn't have to. That's why they cheated so hard in 2020
cough Hunter Biden Laptop cough
There's also the fact that the only reason to have nearly 3 dozen charges is because you're throwing shit at the wall and hoping any of it sticks.