A man is a societal role one can chose... bleh, bleh...
Except for forced conscription, paying for shit, working dangerous/dirty jobs, keeping civilization going, sacrifice shielding women and children from violence.
For those things, being born with a dick seems to conveniently trump "societal roles".
For those things, being born with a dick seems to conveniently trump "societal roles".
You can get out of most of that by donning a wig and dress, but that only lasts until shit really hits the fan. That's why the Church of Girl Dick's teachings were disregarded the minute Ukraine needed bodies.
There is no such thing as 'gender' as conceptualized by the child-abusing quack, John Money - who in turn was expanding on the work of the literal baby-raper, Alfred Kinsey.
To pretend this concept is real is to align yourself with men who deserved bullets in their putrid brains.
They are right about one thing. I wouldn't call most of these "males" men. They aren't women by their own choice, they are because they are too pathetic to be called anything but a worthless pussy.
I wouldn't say he's wrong. Calling someone a man implies they have at least some degree of maturity. Something we can all agree most lefty adult males are lacking in. But of course, that's really not what he means.
There are many things a male human can grow into that are not a "man" - he can physically mature without mental development, growing into an oversized child; he can physically mature while regressing mentally, growing into a cuck, or he can cease to be human entirely by choosing to become a communist.
Except for forced conscription, paying for shit, working dangerous/dirty jobs, keeping civilization going, sacrifice shielding women and children from violence.
For those things, being born with a dick seems to conveniently trump "societal roles".
You can get out of most of that by donning a wig and dress, but that only lasts until shit really hits the fan. That's why the Church of Girl Dick's teachings were disregarded the minute Ukraine needed bodies.
There is no such thing as 'gender' as conceptualized by the child-abusing quack, John Money - who in turn was expanding on the work of the literal baby-raper, Alfred Kinsey.
To pretend this concept is real is to align yourself with men who deserved bullets in their putrid brains.
Someone should troll him and call him a transphobe for insinuating that "male human" = XY-chromosomed person. Outwoke the woke.
trannies aren't human and have no rights.
They are right about one thing. I wouldn't call most of these "males" men. They aren't women by their own choice, they are because they are too pathetic to be called anything but a worthless pussy.
It also means the collective determines what is a man not the individual, hence masculinity trials
Women's rights don't exist, because women don't exist
I thought it was because the were property, not people.
I wouldn't say he's wrong. Calling someone a man implies they have at least some degree of maturity. Something we can all agree most lefty adult males are lacking in. But of course, that's really not what he means.
There are many things a male human can grow into that are not a "man" - he can physically mature without mental development, growing into an oversized child; he can physically mature while regressing mentally, growing into a cuck, or he can cease to be human entirely by choosing to become a communist.
Correct. There's a word for it too. It's called a penis.
"Men can have different roles in society and have different attributes, but also if you deviate from the stereotypes in my head you are a troon"
-t. retard
if I wanted to commit suicide, I would climb to the top of RJs chromosomes and jump to his IQ.
Who's the original poster and why should we care about some rando and their insanity?
to be a man you must have honor
honor and a penis