What a retard. The family court would have handed her custody on a silver platter had she been able to contain her rage about the father fighting for it.
A 27-year-old man and a 33-year-old woman were detained at a hotel just outside Cambridge in the early hours of Thursday, while a 66-year-old man was arrested in the Worcester area.
Nowhere in the article does it say who the shooter was.
But our resident tranny saw the word 'woman' and charged in like a brainless bull.
The woman was probably in the custody battle, yes. Probably (but not definitely) it was one of the men who actually shot the victims, likely the younger man. Also, I'd put more money on the young man being her lover, not brother. The older man is, again just at a guess, one of the other perpetrator's father.
You claimed definitely that the woman was the shooter, with zero evidence, and reported it as fact. Weak.
No, the order was "kill my ex and his father" - as you said, the son is a grown adult.
Of course. Not sure why I thought the 33-year-old woman had a relationship with the 57-year-old man...
Funny how gun control didn't stop violent women, and we don't get a BBC propaganda piece about "toxic femininity" like they did against men for that AI generated cretin Everard.
If she were AI-generated, you wouldn't call her a 'cretin'. You're just thrilled that a woman was murdered... again.
Note that the 'son' who was shot was in his thirties. He was not what the custody battle was about, one hopes.
But let's say it was about that. Often times in these cases, they don't want the kids for the kids' sake, but to deny them to their partner, and to have a 'win'. Sometimes parents kill a child or troon it just to break the heart of the other parent.
The Solomon parable might not work today in our morally degraded state.
I guess that's what I get for only reading the headline. Weird that it'd say "father and son" in regards to a "custody battle," and not "ex and his father."
What a retard. The family court would have handed her custody on a silver platter had she been able to contain her rage about the father fighting for it.
Nowhere in the article does it say who the shooter was.
But our resident tranny saw the word 'woman' and charged in like a brainless bull.
The woman was probably in the custody battle, yes. Probably (but not definitely) it was one of the men who actually shot the victims, likely the younger man. Also, I'd put more money on the young man being her lover, not brother. The older man is, again just at a guess, one of the other perpetrator's father.
You claimed definitely that the woman was the shooter, with zero evidence, and reported it as fact. Weak.
Right, but where did you figure who the shooter was?
It makes little sense. "Hey, go let's kill my ex-husband and my son"? Maybe the guy was the husband's son and not hers.
Of course. Not sure why I thought the 33-year-old woman had a relationship with the 57-year-old man...
If she were AI-generated, you wouldn't call her a 'cretin'. You're just thrilled that a woman was murdered... again.
... What?
Note that the 'son' who was shot was in his thirties. He was not what the custody battle was about, one hopes.
But let's say it was about that. Often times in these cases, they don't want the kids for the kids' sake, but to deny them to their partner, and to have a 'win'. Sometimes parents kill a child or troon it just to break the heart of the other parent.
The Solomon parable might not work today in our morally degraded state.
I guess that's what I get for only reading the headline. Weird that it'd say "father and son" in regards to a "custody battle," and not "ex and his father."
Reminds me of King Solomon's offer to saw the baby in half.
"If I can't have it, he can't either!"