Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

11
"Trump is the one who needs to get the nomination because then the Democrats will win" - Joy Behar. Every woman at that table is the voice of the enemy. (twitter.com)
posted 3 years ago by dekachin 3 years ago by dekachin +11 / -0
27 comments share
27 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (27)
sorted by:
▲ 13 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0

Yeah, they said the same thing in 2016. Better nominate Jeb Bush.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– realerfunction 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

i do enjoy me some victory yebs

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Gizortnik 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

please clap

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Assassin47 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

I'm most likely voting for Trump, but the situation is a little different now than in 2016. The GOP didn't like him but the whole machine wasn't fully united and working against him yet like in 2020. (this is before even accounting for widespread fraud) In 2016 they propped him up as a clown candidate, and even most Democrats didn't take him seriously. They learned not to make that mistake again.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I'm just saying, claiming that Trump can't win is not smart, and citing Democrats as proof that he is a bad candidate is worse.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– dekachin [S] 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Yeah, they said the same thing in 2016.

citation needed

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

You have never seen those compilations?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– dekachin [S] 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

if there are so many out there you can cite one

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

It was literally Joy Behar who said that Trump would never win.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– dekachin [S] 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

"Trump is the one who needs to get the nomination because then the Democrats will win"

is not the same as

"Trump can't win"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

I don't see the difference. Obviously, you say the first thing because you think Trump can't win.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– dekachin [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

lol no, the fact that you don't see the difference says a lot about you, though.

"Trump is the one who needs to get the nomination because then the Democrats will win" = a statement that the Democrats ought to actually support Trump in the primary and undermine/attack his opponents to ensure that he can win in order to gain partisan advantage.

"Trump can't win" = a generic statement that Trump is a weak candidate, not implying or stating anything from the 1st statement.

2 does not imply 1. A lot of additional assumptions and beliefs are required to be injected into 2 to cause it to result in 1.

I don't know any Republican who thought that Republicans ought to support Bernie Sanders in 2016 or 2020 because he would be less electable, even though he was widely believed to be less electable. Ergo, merely thinking a person is less electable does not follow that you ought to manipulate your opponents' primary to support them. It's a dangerous game, as you might be wrong and end up with your worst outcome. It's also unethical and generally perverse to try to manipulate your opponents' primary process instead of putting forth your own best candidate. I generally only see discussion of this from the Left. The Left, as always, lies to claim the Republicans as doing it as projection, then uses that to justify their own large-scale unethical conduct. They even coined a term for it "operation chaos". We saw them employ this tactic en masse in support of "Trumpy" candidates in 2022, with success, which is why they are doubling down on it for 2024.

Democrats have a strange form of mental perversion that even gives rise to this line of thinking. It's not normal to think this way. You share that mental perversion, as do authoritarian propagandists generally. So it's easy to see where the Democrats picked it up.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– cartoonericroberts 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

This is like asking for a citation that the sun rose this morning.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– realerfunction 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

source??? study??? academics???

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Gizortnik 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

In fairness, it did come to me in a dream that the sun would rise today. I kind of glossed over that fact because I was busy flying a mechsuit that only had potato guns for weapons, but it did happen.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– realerfunction 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

based

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– current_horror 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

This is Reddit-tier, literal wojack meme retardation. Anyone remotely plugged in to the 2016 election knows that the dems promoted Trump as part of a pied piper strategy, which ultimately backfired.

Anyone remotely plugged in to the 2020 election knows that Trump won that one, too. That election was stolen by mass rigger fraud in about half a dozen urban democrat strongholds located in swing states.

Any conservative who doesn’t acknowledge that 2020 was stolen is a snake.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– cartoonericroberts 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

I don't want DeSantis, but I also don't want Trump; I want the person the left thinks Trump is.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– PlagueRat27 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

This is my fantasy as well. Trump isn’t conservative enough

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– BandageBandolier 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

At this point I think a candidate that's a mix of George S. Patton and Ghengis Khan would be a real problem solver.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Gizortnik 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

I'm more of a Sulla fan.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Featherless_Biped 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

For once, the kike is right. The Trump train is done. He fucked his base over constantly and and fucked them royally on J6 when he refused to pardon them. He could pardon niggers and kikes all day long, but his own people?

Nah, fuck him.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

I would be more worried that they have just rigged it so hard than Trump now being too much of a liability to beat Biden.

On that front, some recent Arizona supreme court decisions in regards to Kari Lake and signature matching makes me hopeful courts might be realising they have more too lose helping dems rig it than just allowing an open election.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– LeRiverDanube 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Dominion machines be waiting to get revenge on floridaman

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– dekachin [S] 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Faux conservative Alyssa Farah Griffin wants to see 2 things:

  • DeSantis foolishly walk into a trap by agreeing to interviews with left wing partisans like George Stephanopoulos.

Hahahahah, one of the biggest marks of DeSantis' high intelligence is that he has uniquely learned from the past and correctly taken the lesson, unlike other Republicans, that the liberal media is the enemy and must be totally black boxed and shut out. Every intelligent Republican remembers how Katie Couric ended Sarah Palin in 2008 & how Trump foolishly and arrogantly walked into the lion's den multiple times thinking he could walk out a winner, and he never did. You can never win by walking into an ambush because everything is rigged against you. THE ONLY WINNING MOVE IS NOT TO PLAY.

  • "I wanna see him throw a punch at Trump"

DeSantis has chosen not to do this, again, as part of an intelligent campaign strategy that is working in his favor. She only wants him to fight with Trump because she's a lib (the token controlled opposition on The View) and knows that a catfight between the two of them would only lower them both, but DeSantis more.

These women basically just openly spout the Democrat Party's talking points without a filter. Especially that idiot Behar.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Steampunk_Moustache 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Lol, imagine thinking it even matters.

Nobody who would vote for Desantis OR Trump would vote for any democrat right now.

permalink save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy