Why wouldn't they? I've said this before and it bears repeating here. This is a moral conflict. A religious war. They worship evil and they are evil themselves.
Simpering hand wringing and appealing to "the rules" doesn't work on child raping demon cultists.
This behavior should surprise no one, it's perfectly in keeping with the kind of scum who think that infants aren't human and property is theft.
The Left recognizes Schmidt's "Friend-Enemy Distinction".
As Cicero said, "Silent leges en enter arma". In times of war, the law falls silent.
It falls silent because as Clauswitz said, the law is merely a moral force. You can't use moral force against an enemy.
Rouseau explicitly stated that a reign of terror is a moral imperative to coerce anyone outside of the "General Will" back into align with "The Social Contract".
The law does not apply to you, because you are an enemy, and all actions against you are moral until you comply with the asserted "General Will".
This goes for most, if not all, school shooters. Where are the homeless kids taking revenge on the system that failed them? Even the kids that are severely bullied just kill themselves.
These shooters are always "good kids" and I have no doubt their parents tell them so, constantly. They think they're special and perfect and when the world doesn't go their way, they deserve vengeance.
Insofar as it doesn't take away blame for the cunt who did the deed, I'll join in on blaming the parents for indulging their psychopath kids.
Where are the homeless kids taking revenge on the system that failed them? Even the kids that are severely bullied just kill themselves.
These shooters are always "good kids" and I have no doubt their parents tell them so, constantly. They think they're special and perfect and when the world doesn't go their way, they deserve vengeance.
Bingo. It's not the poor kids who have nothing. It's not the violent thugs. It's always the same middle class, comfortable, coddled kids with loving, well-meaning, yet utterly ineffective and useless parents who are academically capable and never hurt a fly, who stand still and take punches without retaliating because they've been told violence is bad and they should turn the other cheek.
It’s old myths that date back to Columbine. At first, it got out that they were loners who had no friends and were supposedly mistreated, and so that is what has been run with with these shooters.
What came out after the fact (but far later than the news cycle), was that far from being victims, the shooters were the bullies. And them shooting up the school was their ultimate and most permanent act of bullying.
Which is exactly why it’s usually the spoiled rotten kids becoming shooters in these instances.
Always privileged little fucking subhumans. It's never anyone with a truly shitty life, they either just kill themselves cuz they want the pain to end (sadly) or they buck up and make life their bitch
The shooters are actually incredibly fragile and entitled, and then when they don't get the entitled world they were promised, they shatter and cut everyone's hands.
If it isn't Christianity or anything else, they're forced to confront a lot where they've basically had a free ride chastizing and villainizing disenfranchized young white men. This fucks with the programming, so they shift towards being a ghoul about it.
Christianity ends up being the perfect scapegoat since no one wants to admit that this problem has become memetic. We magnified it to such an extreme that it has become hard-coded into the DNA of our culture almost the way in which myth and story influences the development of the larger organism, except it is emergent, errant, self-terminating logic. Of course we aren't mindful of this, and like a rat that chews through or touches the wrong wire in the walls - living moment-to-moment, we are undone by forces we cannot reasonably comprehend. The problems will accumulate until it western society becomes terminal and goes through another schism that cleans the slate, but that is the optimistic ending.
See, what I don’t understand, on a slight tangent, is why do they almost always kill CHILDREN..?
I realize that they are easy targets - fine. I hated school, too. I understand that severe trauma, at school, will make you utterly despise the institution, and all involved…
But how do you go from that to “I will go and shoot these primary-aged children who had nothing to do with what happened to me”, but who just happened to be studying there at the time…
Even understanding this as an act of both insanity and pure evil, I really can’t understand the “logic” of going for this outcome, instead of, say, more directly blaming people who had greater “involvement”…
Just my thoughts, each fucking time this happens, at a school, around the world…
I have a couple of ideas for that.
One, kids can't fight back easily. Schools are a very easy target if nobody else is likely to be armed.
Two, it scars the community that the perpetrator might feel has wronged it. In this case, it was a private school, so kids there had parents who were part of this hated community.
But how do you go from that to “I will go and shoot these primary-aged children who had nothing to do with what happened to me”, but who just happened to be studying there at the time…
It's easy to explain. They're very soft targets, as you said. Also, it's more shocking to people than when you murder adults. If you want to make a statement, and terrorists do, then you would murder kids. If 6 had been shot at a mall, people would not be talking about it days after.
Why wouldn't they? I've said this before and it bears repeating here. This is a moral conflict. A religious war. They worship evil and they are evil themselves.
Simpering hand wringing and appealing to "the rules" doesn't work on child raping demon cultists.
This behavior should surprise no one, it's perfectly in keeping with the kind of scum who think that infants aren't human and property is theft.
The Left recognizes Schmidt's "Friend-Enemy Distinction".
As Cicero said, "Silent leges en enter arma". In times of war, the law falls silent.
It falls silent because as Clauswitz said, the law is merely a moral force. You can't use moral force against an enemy.
Rouseau explicitly stated that a reign of terror is a moral imperative to coerce anyone outside of the "General Will" back into align with "The Social Contract".
The law does not apply to you, because you are an enemy, and all actions against you are moral until you comply with the asserted "General Will".
It's why they smash children's heads into trees.
It worked for Islam. Muh Islamophobia! So why change the playbook. If it ain't broke, its woke.
Still living in their house at 28. They did no such thing. They obviously loved her no matter how much of a fuckup she was.
And that's the problem. They never straightened her the fuck out. They never hit her with the ultimatum of a reality check.
Exactly.
This goes for most, if not all, school shooters. Where are the homeless kids taking revenge on the system that failed them? Even the kids that are severely bullied just kill themselves.
These shooters are always "good kids" and I have no doubt their parents tell them so, constantly. They think they're special and perfect and when the world doesn't go their way, they deserve vengeance.
Insofar as it doesn't take away blame for the cunt who did the deed, I'll join in on blaming the parents for indulging their psychopath kids.
Bingo. It's not the poor kids who have nothing. It's not the violent thugs. It's always the same middle class, comfortable, coddled kids with loving, well-meaning, yet utterly ineffective and useless parents who are academically capable and never hurt a fly, who stand still and take punches without retaliating because they've been told violence is bad and they should turn the other cheek.
It’s old myths that date back to Columbine. At first, it got out that they were loners who had no friends and were supposedly mistreated, and so that is what has been run with with these shooters.
What came out after the fact (but far later than the news cycle), was that far from being victims, the shooters were the bullies. And them shooting up the school was their ultimate and most permanent act of bullying.
Which is exactly why it’s usually the spoiled rotten kids becoming shooters in these instances.
They are always bullies. Just sometimes they weren't physically capable of bullying their peers. Until they got a gun
Always privileged little fucking subhumans. It's never anyone with a truly shitty life, they either just kill themselves cuz they want the pain to end (sadly) or they buck up and make life their bitch
Raz0rfist made a good point about this about 5 years ago.
The shooters are actually incredibly fragile and entitled, and then when they don't get the entitled world they were promised, they shatter and cut everyone's hands.
Bullseye.
If it isn't Christianity or anything else, they're forced to confront a lot where they've basically had a free ride chastizing and villainizing disenfranchized young white men. This fucks with the programming, so they shift towards being a ghoul about it.
Christianity ends up being the perfect scapegoat since no one wants to admit that this problem has become memetic. We magnified it to such an extreme that it has become hard-coded into the DNA of our culture almost the way in which myth and story influences the development of the larger organism, except it is emergent, errant, self-terminating logic. Of course we aren't mindful of this, and like a rat that chews through or touches the wrong wire in the walls - living moment-to-moment, we are undone by forces we cannot reasonably comprehend. The problems will accumulate until it western society becomes terminal and goes through another schism that cleans the slate, but that is the optimistic ending.
See, what I don’t understand, on a slight tangent, is why do they almost always kill CHILDREN..?
I realize that they are easy targets - fine. I hated school, too. I understand that severe trauma, at school, will make you utterly despise the institution, and all involved…
But how do you go from that to “I will go and shoot these primary-aged children who had nothing to do with what happened to me”, but who just happened to be studying there at the time…
Even understanding this as an act of both insanity and pure evil, I really can’t understand the “logic” of going for this outcome, instead of, say, more directly blaming people who had greater “involvement”…
Just my thoughts, each fucking time this happens, at a school, around the world…
Fucking yuck.
I have a couple of ideas for that.
One, kids can't fight back easily. Schools are a very easy target if nobody else is likely to be armed.
Two, it scars the community that the perpetrator might feel has wronged it. In this case, it was a private school, so kids there had parents who were part of this hated community.
Because they're vulnerable because people care about kids
Ah, you said the same thing I did but far more concisely.
In China guns are banned and yet knife attacks against children are very common.
The motive is because of a combination of them being easy targets & it causing the maximum pain to "society" that these people hate.
It's easy to explain. They're very soft targets, as you said. Also, it's more shocking to people than when you murder adults. If you want to make a statement, and terrorists do, then you would murder kids. If 6 had been shot at a mall, people would not be talking about it days after.
Jealousy, because they are still innocent and untainted.