Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

24
Editor in chief of Scientific American dismissed claims of a medical expert pharmacist, does not think any evidence is needed for a perpetual booster campaign (twitter.com)
posted 2 years ago by YesMovement 2 years ago by YesMovement +24 / -0
12 comments share
12 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (12)
sorted by:
▲ 12 ▼
– YesMovement [S] 12 points 2 years ago +12 / -0

In case she deletes: https://archive.is/45uHw

I got another COVID booster shot and the pharmacist said, "you're good now, you don't need any more shots" and I'm like, buddy, I'm going to be back every six months to a year until something else kills me, which is the entire point

https://twitter.com/TimRunsHisMouth/status/1638792451438567425

Don't stop there... you can have all 6 of the ones I'm never taking as well.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– TerpenoidTester 10 points 2 years ago +10 / -0

The real irony is she's right when she says "something else kills me" because just like AIDS the boosters destroy your immune system so something else WILL kill you.

Dumb bitch doesn't even realize she's being medically accurate.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Kienan 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

If the myocarditis doesn't getcha, the lack of an immune system will!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0

Fun fact: the Editor-in-Chief of Scientific American retweeted a call for violence in the aftermath of the Dobbs decision.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– cartoonericroberts 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0

I'm a little concerned the editor in chief of Scientific American is a woman.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

If you look at what they write, you won't be concerned at all because there's nothing left for them to lose.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

The pharmacist is like one of the few doctors in the past that knows the four humors is a load of shit and trying to hint to their patients 'ok, you don't need blood letting anymore to get better'

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Kienan 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

...until something else kills me...

Oh, sweaty, don't worry, that's not going to happen. You're leaking booster, at this point.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Smith1980 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

Amazing that people are that deep in covid hysteria. I guess not very amazing considering that people still wear masks

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– current_horror 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

The inexplicable part is that these people can see everyone else not wearing masks, not getting jabs, carrying on as normal, and not dying. What are the lefties telling themselves in order to reconcile what they believe with what they see? Like how do you wear a mask to work when you’re the only one doing it? How do you get your fifth jab when everyone at the office stopped after two?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– lgbtqwtfbbq 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

I assume they think some variant of "it's called 'being a good person'".

But the thing that fills me with sadness and rage is when I see kids wearing them. Especially when their parents aren't. It's one of those things where I don't know which is worse: if the parent is making them wear it or if the kid actually wants to wear it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

IDK if anyone noticed, but Scientific American got real dumb lately. I'm sure it's just a coincidence. I didn't even know who this ho was, but I had already stopped listening to them.

permalink save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

The below rules are just a summary of the rules which can be found in the Welcome Ashore post.

.

ONE: Do not post Illegal Activity, or criminal manifestos.

.

TWO: Do not engage in speech that promotes, advocates, glorifies, or endorses violence.

.

THREE: Do not threaten, harass, defame, or bully users.

.

FOUR: Do not post involuntary Salacious Material.

.

FIVE: Do not post Porn

.

SIX: NSFW content must be flaired NSFW.

.

SEVEN: Do not post Facebook accounts or twitter accounts with less than 500 followers, and personal information.

.

EIGHT: Do not intentionally deceive others by impersonating another.

.

NINE: Do not solicit or engage in transactions that are federally regulated by the US govt.

.

TEN: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

ELEVEN: Do not post spam.

.

TWELVE: Do not post intentional falsehoods or hoaxes.

.

THIRTEEN: No reposts

.

FOURTEEN: Do not post more than 5 posts a day to this sub.

.

FIFTEEN: Do not direct particularly egregious identity based slurs at users.

.

SIXTEEN: Do not attack entire identity groups as inferior or conspiring.


Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • ClockworkFool
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - rgqpq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy