24 Editor in chief of Scientific American dismissed claims of a medical expert pharmacist, does not think any evidence is needed for a perpetual booster campaign (twitter.com) posted 1 year ago by YesMovement 1 year ago by YesMovement +24 / -0 12 comments share 12 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Fun fact: the Editor-in-Chief of Scientific American retweeted a call for violence in the aftermath of the Dobbs decision.