24 Editor in chief of Scientific American dismissed claims of a medical expert pharmacist, does not think any evidence is needed for a perpetual booster campaign (twitter.com) posted 1 year ago by YesMovement 1 year ago by YesMovement +24 / -0 12 comments share 12 comments share save hide report block hide replies
IDK if anyone noticed, but Scientific American got real dumb lately. I'm sure it's just a coincidence. I didn't even know who this ho was, but I had already stopped listening to them.