The STD thing about being uncircumcised is completely overblown.
Best way not to get HIV? Don't be a faggot, and don't do dry sex (dry sex is when idiot African purposely dry out a woman's vagina using dirt, wool, etc. to make the vagina dry).
I've seen is people ranting about hygiene as if men don't know how to wash their dicks with soap
Same reason female feminists call men predators. Because the only ones who will associate them with feminists are.
As far as I'm concerned pro-circumcision people are crazy and have a lot of issues, end of, leave my dick alone.
They want to persuade themselves that their body is fine. I actually got a very long rant in a PM which was quite amusing a while back, with all sorts of crazy.
As far as I'm concerned pro-circumcision people are crazy and have a lot of issues, end of, leave my dick alone. there is no argument about hygiene, it's bullshit brainwashing.
You expect low IQ nimrods who don't know anything about the human body to be thinking about the future of their own and their partner's sexual health? Nope, sorry: got to get that nutt off 💦
Same reason circumcision is done. Shortens the act and reduces pleasure. Doesn't stop conception though which is all that matters to religious leaders.
There’s an argument to be made for hygienic uses of circumcision and doing it at a later year (post puberty) could cause larger health complications and scarring than doing it in infancy. I don’t mind leaving it at the discretion of the parents as it is really a fairly simple surgery whose complications are entirely due to the competency of the doctor.
This is really sad sophistry. Even if you “wash your dick” you statistically are more prone to penis cancer, uti’s, and stds because of how the hood traps liquid and bacteria. Removing hair follicles doesn’t reduce chances of cancer it raises it, same with fingernails and cancer/ infections.
If men weren't meant to have a foreskin, it wouldn't be there in nature. Circumcision was also incredibly rare outside of Judaism until they started pushing it in the 20th century.
I see circumcision as one of the first body modifications by humans who think they "know better" than nature. Given science's poor track record in deciding what is important and what isn't on the human body I wouldn't trust it.
It’s been proven to date back to 6000bc with evidence as far back as 15000bc.
Circumcision was also incredibly rare outside of Judaism until they started pushing it in the 20th century.
This is patently false, while Judaism heavily utilizes the practice, Islam and Christianity did as well. Circumcision was one of the best preventive measures for infection in men before antiseptics. England and America started using it as a preventative measure of stds mid 19th century and was largely pushed by devout Christian doctors. One of the more famous being Dr. Kellogg who founded the company of the same name.
I knew a guy who got it done at 11 after he moved to the US and said he had to sit in a bathtub for a week because the air hurt. I see both sides on this issue but the people making this comparison are utterly insane and know they are wrong.
Yeah children heal faster. But adults have a choice not to do it. The question is really whether you want it done at all and to what degree you're going to allow parents to make that choice for their own children. Since I don't see it as serious mutilation, more like getting ears pierced, it is not within me to outlaw other people's choice on this.
Circumcision= double mastectomy?
At this level of logic freezing a mole is the same as a removing a kidney…
The STD thing about being uncircumcised is completely overblown.
Best way not to get HIV? Don't be a faggot, and don't do dry sex (dry sex is when idiot African purposely dry out a woman's vagina using dirt, wool, etc. to make the vagina dry).
People invested in dick mutilation, are very invested. Don't sweat it, and see them for what they are.
Same reason female feminists call men predators. Because the only ones who will associate them with feminists are.
They want to persuade themselves that their body is fine. I actually got a very long rant in a PM which was quite amusing a while back, with all sorts of crazy.
Every pro-circumcision argument is made by working backwards.
Rather than deciding its worth it because X or Z reason, they know its "worth it" and just start pulling every reason they think works to prove it.
Oy vey, that's islamophobic and antisemitic!
Wait... why the hell would anyone want to be dry? That sounds painful as hell for everyone involved.
You expect low IQ nimrods who don't know anything about the human body to be thinking about the future of their own and their partner's sexual health? Nope, sorry: got to get that nutt off 💦
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dry_sex
Suriname too:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378874107005934#:~:text=In%20many%20African%20cultures%2C%20plants,for%20the%20man%20during%20intercourse.
Same reason circumcision is done. Shortens the act and reduces pleasure. Doesn't stop conception though which is all that matters to religious leaders.
Africans are dumber than I thought
I didn't think it was possible, but here we are.
Why???
There’s an argument to be made for hygienic uses of circumcision and doing it at a later year (post puberty) could cause larger health complications and scarring than doing it in infancy. I don’t mind leaving it at the discretion of the parents as it is really a fairly simple surgery whose complications are entirely due to the competency of the doctor.
This is really sad sophistry. Even if you “wash your dick” you statistically are more prone to penis cancer, uti’s, and stds because of how the hood traps liquid and bacteria. Removing hair follicles doesn’t reduce chances of cancer it raises it, same with fingernails and cancer/ infections.
If men weren't meant to have a foreskin, it wouldn't be there in nature. Circumcision was also incredibly rare outside of Judaism until they started pushing it in the 20th century.
I see circumcision as one of the first body modifications by humans who think they "know better" than nature. Given science's poor track record in deciding what is important and what isn't on the human body I wouldn't trust it.
It’s been proven to date back to 6000bc with evidence as far back as 15000bc.
This is patently false, while Judaism heavily utilizes the practice, Islam and Christianity did as well. Circumcision was one of the best preventive measures for infection in men before antiseptics. England and America started using it as a preventative measure of stds mid 19th century and was largely pushed by devout Christian doctors. One of the more famous being Dr. Kellogg who founded the company of the same name.
I knew a guy who got it done at 11 after he moved to the US and said he had to sit in a bathtub for a week because the air hurt. I see both sides on this issue but the people making this comparison are utterly insane and know they are wrong.
It hurts infants as well. Just as much.
Great way to start life, eh?
Yeah children heal faster. But adults have a choice not to do it. The question is really whether you want it done at all and to what degree you're going to allow parents to make that choice for their own children. Since I don't see it as serious mutilation, more like getting ears pierced, it is not within me to outlaw other people's choice on this.
Its a lot worse than ear piercing. Its removing a functional organ. Look up what the purpose of the foreskin is.
why do you believe that fake news
2 rabbis downvoted.