This is really sad sophistry. Even if you “wash your dick” you statistically are more prone to penis cancer, uti’s, and stds because of how the hood traps liquid and bacteria. Removing hair follicles doesn’t reduce chances of cancer it raises it, same with fingernails and cancer/ infections.
that's like how they do remove women's breast's when they don't have breast cancer but they do have a possibility of getting it since it runs in the family. there's no such thing as foreskin cancer tho. the health benefits are made up, it's done to reduce pleasure of sex (and masturbation)
foisted onto us by a religion that most people aren't a part of.
Christian physicians emulated the Jewish practice of their own volition. Jews certainly deserve their share of blame for the stubbornness of the practice - they're the only ones who would claim a ban would be an unconstitutional infringement on their right to practice their religion - but it's not their fault that Christian men like Kellogg thought circumcision was responsible for Jews' good sexual health.
You are rationalizing barbarism that was foisted onto us by a religion that most people aren't a part of.
Jews didn’t invent circumcision, circumcision also was one of the biggest life extending surgeries men could due back in the day.
Don't fuck random strangers. STD problems solved.
Don’t fuck random strangers, still get UTI and die from sepsis. Congratulations
Having intact body parts increases cancer risks for those body parts? Shocker!
Is a circumcised penis not intact? Can it not function exactly the same? Hilarious the amp of stupid coming from you.
In that case, we should start proactively hacking off other body parts to decrease cancer risk.
You would be increasing alternative cancer risks in most cases, but someone who has probably never even studied basic biology won’t get that because they’re too busy blaming the Jews for a minor surgery that extended male life for centuries before antiseptics existed and still arguably does now.
If you don't have your colon, you can't get colon cancer. So let's start removing baby's colons.
Again conflating a minor surgery that removes a small portion of skin with an entire organ. Congratulations you are making the exact same conflation as the retarded liberal claiming circumcision is the same as a double mastectomy.
Which, by the way, irrevocably changes their brain chemistry in countless negative ways.
Under this argument any infant with any minor medical condition is “irrevocably changed” because they felt temporary pain. Let me guess you think infants can determine their gender upon birth too…
Again, pathetic sophistry. Removal of the hood doesn’t impact ability to reproduce and it doesn’t remove the penis. Shame you can’t make a better argument than a liberal equating circumcision to a double mastectomy.
Again, pathetic sophistry. Removal of the hood doesn’t impact ability to reproduce and it doesn’t remove the penis.
Neither does removing one testicle. It does reduce the likelihood of cancer. That is exactly equivalent to your claim.
Shame you can’t make a better argument than a liberal equating circumcision to a double mastectomy.
It is not equivalent, but it's certainly comparable as the cutting up of the sexual parts of people. One wonders why people are so insistent on inflicting this on children.
Call me crazy, but I oppose cutting up the sexual organs of children.
Neither does removing one testicle. It does reduce the likelihood of cancer. That is exactly equivalent to your claim.
Removing 1 testicle does most assuredly reduce your ability to reproduce. 2. it also impacts your other organs. 3. It causes major complication to your endocrine system. You are comparing a small amount of skin to a major organ.
It is not equivalent, but it's certainly comparable as the cutting up of the sexual parts of people. One wonders why people are so insistent on inflicting this on children.
Because the faster recovery, ease of surgery, and lifelong benefits.
Yeah, well you're more prone to breast cancer if you keep your boobs too. You wouldn't happen to be circumcised, would you?
Before you call this "sad sophistry," first realize that your argument amounts to "even if you wash <body part>, you still get <body part-specific hygiene and health issues>." People comparing testicles or hair follicles to foreskin in this situation are giving you perfect analogies based on your argument, they're not saying the body parts are equivalent in importance or magnitude.
I’m sorry, do circumcised people not have penises or are you making a stupid comparison? removing a small amount of epithelial tissue is not the same as removing an entire organ…
I'm willing to bet you don't know that some infections associated with foreskin are literally named specifically for the foreskin. I didn't say anything about whole penises.
Exactly zero people are arguing degree or magnitude here. I did not say small piece of skin = entire organ. Again, me and others here are analogizing your poor argument regarding tissue removal for the sake of limiting health and hygiene problems associated with that tissue. Removing foreskin for hygiene is akin to removing fingernails for hygiene. It's 100% comparable.
Removing foreskin for hygiene is akin to removing fingernails for hygiene. It's 100% comparable.
Then you’ll have no trouble finding medical studies extolling the hygienic benefits of fingernail removal and how it lowers chances of infection and cancer, oh wait, if actually raises them and you’re making a stupid argument?
Exactly zero people are arguing degree or magnitude here. I did not say small piece of skin = entire organ.
So far we have the epithelial tissue of the hood being equivalent to testicles, colons, and keratinized tissue… but no one’s arguing degree or magnitude here…
This is really sad sophistry. Even if you “wash your dick” you statistically are more prone to penis cancer, uti’s, and stds because of how the hood traps liquid and bacteria. Removing hair follicles doesn’t reduce chances of cancer it raises it, same with fingernails and cancer/ infections.
Coming from people whose arguments are exact copy pastes of the people pushing troon surgeries this is just delightful.
It’s gaslighting to show centuries of medical studies…
Coming from the side of “removing a small piece of epithelial tissue is the same as cutting of the entire penis”
everyone block this paid shill
that's like how they do remove women's breast's when they don't have breast cancer but they do have a possibility of getting it since it runs in the family. there's no such thing as foreskin cancer tho. the health benefits are made up, it's done to reduce pleasure of sex (and masturbation)
Christian physicians emulated the Jewish practice of their own volition. Jews certainly deserve their share of blame for the stubbornness of the practice - they're the only ones who would claim a ban would be an unconstitutional infringement on their right to practice their religion - but it's not their fault that Christian men like Kellogg thought circumcision was responsible for Jews' good sexual health.
This started long before the "Christian worship of Jews".
Jews didn’t invent circumcision, circumcision also was one of the biggest life extending surgeries men could due back in the day.
Don’t fuck random strangers, still get UTI and die from sepsis. Congratulations
Is a circumcised penis not intact? Can it not function exactly the same? Hilarious the amp of stupid coming from you.
You would be increasing alternative cancer risks in most cases, but someone who has probably never even studied basic biology won’t get that because they’re too busy blaming the Jews for a minor surgery that extended male life for centuries before antiseptics existed and still arguably does now.
Again conflating a minor surgery that removes a small portion of skin with an entire organ. Congratulations you are making the exact same conflation as the retarded liberal claiming circumcision is the same as a double mastectomy.
Under this argument any infant with any minor medical condition is “irrevocably changed” because they felt temporary pain. Let me guess you think infants can determine their gender upon birth too…
No, it is mutilated.
Fat person loses a bunch of weight, gets excess skin removed.
AoV: You’re mutilated
Lmao so fucking what retard, it's an important part of your sexual anatomy. Why don't we just remove the clitoris, it's pointless and looks ugly.
Simps like you shit bricks over the idea of that tho, because you're pussy whipped.
No it’s really not, the only prominence of the hood is to create a seal during orgasm which has never shown to increase odds of conception
There’s no medical benefits to removing the clitoris and a known increased risk to cancer.
Read a medical study princess
medical studies are owned by jews
Give it a rest.
Men with two balls are statistically more prone to testicular cancer.
Now, now, no need to run to get the kitchen knife.
Again, pathetic sophistry. Removal of the hood doesn’t impact ability to reproduce and it doesn’t remove the penis. Shame you can’t make a better argument than a liberal equating circumcision to a double mastectomy.
Neither does removing one testicle. It does reduce the likelihood of cancer. That is exactly equivalent to your claim.
It is not equivalent, but it's certainly comparable as the cutting up of the sexual parts of people. One wonders why people are so insistent on inflicting this on children.
Call me crazy, but I oppose cutting up the sexual organs of children.
Because the faster recovery, ease of surgery, and lifelong benefits.
Yeah, well you're more prone to breast cancer if you keep your boobs too. You wouldn't happen to be circumcised, would you?
Before you call this "sad sophistry," first realize that your argument amounts to "even if you wash <body part>, you still get <body part-specific hygiene and health issues>." People comparing testicles or hair follicles to foreskin in this situation are giving you perfect analogies based on your argument, they're not saying the body parts are equivalent in importance or magnitude.
I’m sorry, do circumcised people not have penises or are you making a stupid comparison? removing a small amount of epithelial tissue is not the same as removing an entire organ…
I'm willing to bet you don't know that some infections associated with foreskin are literally named specifically for the foreskin. I didn't say anything about whole penises.
Exactly zero people are arguing degree or magnitude here. I did not say small piece of skin = entire organ. Again, me and others here are analogizing your poor argument regarding tissue removal for the sake of limiting health and hygiene problems associated with that tissue. Removing foreskin for hygiene is akin to removing fingernails for hygiene. It's 100% comparable.
Then you’ll have no trouble finding medical studies extolling the hygienic benefits of fingernail removal and how it lowers chances of infection and cancer, oh wait, if actually raises them and you’re making a stupid argument?
So far we have the epithelial tissue of the hood being equivalent to testicles, colons, and keratinized tissue… but no one’s arguing degree or magnitude here…
Hugs: they're not saying the body parts are equivalent
You: is not the same
...that's what he just said.
Hugs: Yeah, well you're more prone to breast cancer if you keep your boobs too. You wouldn't happen to be circumcised, would you?