The plans were based on a report written by Baroness Kennedy of the Shaws, who was paid £1,000 a day by Nicola Sturgeon’s government to conduct an investigation into misogyny north of the border.
The Labour peer published her report last year, arguing that men perpetrated “daily abuses which blight the lives” of women.
She claimed she had found that women were facing “an absolute horror story” and warned that what was perceived as “low level” harassment could prove to be “the subsoil from which more grave crimes emerge”.
If I was getting $1000 a day to look into a problem you bet your ass I'd find that problem EVERYWHERE.
And the only solution is for me to do more research....at $1500 a day since the problem is much larger than we thought!
Women grifting women is amusing to watch from a distance.
"Women making unwanted sexually-motivated advances towards men, or discussing their sexual conquests in public, would not face sanctions under the legislation."
TheImpossible1 is right about this pattern of behavior, even though he's wrong about the solutions. Grifting female influencers and politicians will always latch on to whatever group of men they think can be manipulated easiest. Then once they gain any power they start turning the momentum towards furthering women's issues. The only difference in the political spectrum is how extreme they are - whether they'll push female empowerment at the expense of all else, through intersectionalism and allyship, or as a "women most affected" qualifier to the cause they're pretending to support. At best, your favorite Based Female Politician supports whatever you support AND having more women in control.
If I was getting $1000 a day to look into a problem you bet your ass I'd find that problem EVERYWHERE.
And the only solution is for me to do more research....at $1500 a day since the problem is much larger than we thought!
Women grifting women is amusing to watch from a distance.
I am Spartacus.
What now, idiots?
so if a woman says a guy has a small penis, she's guilty of a felony too, eh?
"Women making unwanted sexually-motivated advances towards men, or discussing their sexual conquests in public, would not face sanctions under the legislation."
how the fuck did Scotland, the original land of the free, turn into this pussy footing shell?
Too busy blaming the English for everything to notice their own parliament was full of despicable cunts, I imagine.
Sadly true.
TheImpossible1 is right about this pattern of behavior, even though he's wrong about the solutions. Grifting female influencers and politicians will always latch on to whatever group of men they think can be manipulated easiest. Then once they gain any power they start turning the momentum towards furthering women's issues. The only difference in the political spectrum is how extreme they are - whether they'll push female empowerment at the expense of all else, through intersectionalism and allyship, or as a "women most affected" qualifier to the cause they're pretending to support. At best, your favorite Based Female Politician supports whatever you support AND having more women in control.