The fact that the first word in this article wasn't "traitor" annoys me. It evidently annoys a lot of people, since it prompted an opinion piece about it the next day. An opinion piece I disagree with: the problem has never been that the left considers some crimes to be unforgivable, the problem is that they'll forgive serial child rape but not a minor defending himself from said serial child rapist.
There are much greater concerns regarding the status of the world's ocean than the fish we eat. IE, status of the coral reefs and oceanic plankton.
As I recall, both play fairly vital roles in a good 50% of the world's source of oxygen. Far more impactful and far more difficult to bring back to a healthy status than forests.
Of course you'll almost never hear self-proclaimed "environmentalists" talk about this. They're so totally clueless and obsessed with whatever "climate change" related news they're fed from the media. And as we all know, the media rarely has the faintest clue how anything works in the scientific world. Or anything else in the real world for that matter.
Well after my totally unbiased tour of the oceans, I can unequivocally reassure Jane Fonda that our treatment of the ocean is understandable, given that it is constantly flooding our coastal farmland, often when those farms have nothing to do with any pollution. Furthermore, any whales or dolphins that say differently are hypocrites and liars. Please refer to this photograph of me next to some industrialists at a beachside waste depot.
To give her some credit, fish stocks are a shared resource vulnerable to the tragedy of the commons. Right-wing conservation isn't an oxymoron: a sensible hunter wants to leave enough prey behind that we can continue to hunt them tomorrow.
WTF? I've only had it a couple times, but the times I have shark meat it was amazing. If you've already functionally killed the animal for the fins, why not eat the delicious part?
Because the Chinese are incredibly wasteful about that sort of stuff. Its the same reason that a lot of animals have been driven to near extinction because they need one or two parts from it for traditional Chinese "medicine."
The fact that the first word in this article wasn't "traitor" annoys me. It evidently annoys a lot of people, since it prompted an opinion piece about it the next day. An opinion piece I disagree with: the problem has never been that the left considers some crimes to be unforgivable, the problem is that they'll forgive serial child rape but not a minor defending himself from said serial child rapist.
I don't forgive her, because she's not actually sorry.
There are much greater concerns regarding the status of the world's ocean than the fish we eat. IE, status of the coral reefs and oceanic plankton.
As I recall, both play fairly vital roles in a good 50% of the world's source of oxygen. Far more impactful and far more difficult to bring back to a healthy status than forests.
Of course you'll almost never hear self-proclaimed "environmentalists" talk about this. They're so totally clueless and obsessed with whatever "climate change" related news they're fed from the media. And as we all know, the media rarely has the faintest clue how anything works in the scientific world. Or anything else in the real world for that matter.
Well after my totally unbiased tour of the oceans, I can unequivocally reassure Jane Fonda that our treatment of the ocean is understandable, given that it is constantly flooding our coastal farmland, often when those farms have nothing to do with any pollution. Furthermore, any whales or dolphins that say differently are hypocrites and liars. Please refer to this photograph of me next to some industrialists at a beachside waste depot.
To give her some credit, fish stocks are a shared resource vulnerable to the tragedy of the commons. Right-wing conservation isn't an oxymoron: a sensible hunter wants to leave enough prey behind that we can continue to hunt them tomorrow.
WTF? I've only had it a couple times, but the times I have shark meat it was amazing. If you've already functionally killed the animal for the fins, why not eat the delicious part?
Because the Chinese are incredibly wasteful about that sort of stuff. Its the same reason that a lot of animals have been driven to near extinction because they need one or two parts from it for traditional Chinese "medicine."
who's "we"? isn't the vast majority of the pollution coming from like two or three rivers in asia?