There are much greater concerns regarding the status of the world's ocean than the fish we eat. IE, status of the coral reefs and oceanic plankton.
As I recall, both play fairly vital roles in a good 50% of the world's source of oxygen. Far more impactful and far more difficult to bring back to a healthy status than forests.
Of course you'll almost never hear self-proclaimed "environmentalists" talk about this. They're so totally clueless and obsessed with whatever "climate change" related news they're fed from the media. And as we all know, the media rarely has the faintest clue how anything works in the scientific world. Or anything else in the real world for that matter.
There are much greater concerns regarding the status of the world's ocean than the fish we eat. IE, status of the coral reefs and oceanic plankton.
As I recall, both play fairly vital roles in a good 50% of the world's source of oxygen. Far more impactful and far more difficult to bring back to a healthy status than forests.
Of course you'll almost never hear self-proclaimed "environmentalists" talk about this. They're so totally clueless and obsessed with whatever "climate change" related news they're fed from the media. And as we all know, the media rarely has the faintest clue how anything works in the scientific world. Or anything else in the real world for that matter.