Jordan Peterson is speedrunning revealing himself to be a feminist plant.
(media.communities.win)
Comments (44)
sorted by:
Ah, similar to the accusations that led to a huge purge of content on Pornhub before...
I'll be honest, if I were in charge of Pornhub and could do it, I'd switch all the content over to either drawn or AI/CGI, completely cut off having ANY actual people involved in the content.
That stops any trafficking or underage concerns (which is always a concern EVERYWHERE in the porn industry) and cuts off the ethot grifters. If people want to jerk off, may as well make sure the narcissists get as little money as possible.
Led by the conservatives' best friends, Mastercard and PayPal.
That won't be good enough, unnamed groups went after Stable Diffusion for allowing adult content.
Women want complete control.
FCC recently appointed a feminist who's an OnlyFans acolyte and gave a dominatrix an award for her "service to the Internet".
Dude, Mastercard and Paypal in particular are leftists. They've been deplatforming conservatives for many years. The biggest push to get rid of porn comes from the left these days.
I know.
I'd argue it's become bi-partisan, like all truly pro-woman issues. Nothing unites left and establishment right like supporting something that harms men.
Internet porn itself harms men. It creates weak, pathetic addicted coomers. If it disappeared overnight men would be so much better off.
The problem is that the normal way of getting that need met (a girlfriend or wife who puts out regularly) is becoming less and less feasible for the average man with each passing day. It's a high cost proposition with an extreme amount of risk, and for many men the door is being slammed shut entirely. Porn has its problems, and those problems increase in severity as its consumption gets more frequent and the content itself becomes more degenerate (the tranny problem coinciding with the explosion of porn availability isn't coincidental), but going after porn without dealing with the root cause of its ubiquity misses the forest for the trees.
If that was the case, women wouldn't attack it.
"porn addiction" was a theory by obese male genocide advocate Andrea Dworkin.
Isn't your narrative that women created trannies to genocide the men, and now the trannies turned on women and are the key to defeating them? Funny how women alternate between scoring own goals or being 5D chess masters depending on what flavor of bullshit you want to sell.
And you're way behind on having problems with Peterson. Nationalists were calling him out years ago.
No, I said that supporting the trannies would be beneficial because it would un-define woman.
What for? Didn't push marriage hard enough?
Anyone with a halfway decent understanding of neuroscience can tell you porn addiction is a real phenomenon.
Most of the people on here pretend that porn doesn't lead to real world effects. They'll claim that porn is just like video games
And yet none of them can tell you how women use far worse tactics to effectively enslave men.
It's purely semantic. They call it addiction for the same reason they call gaming an addiction, any minute you spend not serving your masters, you're an unproductive slave on their plantation. The few cents they make from clicks is not making up for the fact you're not "manning up" and getting married so they can tear your wallet apart.
Sorry to interject with my opinion, but fir me it's a bit of column A and a bit of column B.
Porn addiction harms men like ANY other non physiological addiction harms men, like gambling. You get too obsessed on a thing, you spend time that could be spent on self improvement or making yourself better off focusing on the addiction. That isn't the thing the women Imp refers to hate it.
What they hate is that a side affect of porn addiction is that the men afflicted by it or men who can just use porn to get off once in a while without addiction, have a release for any sexual tension they have building up (which thanks to today's sexualized society there's a lot of) without requiring being physically involved with a woman. That's the part they hate as it gives them less control. If men aren't slaves to their sexual urges and can think with clear minds, harder to convince them to the stupid shit feminists propose.
It's not just that. It allows them to stay out of the systems that the feminists have already corrupted. They're far less likely to be scammed into being some whore's meal ticket if they're not thinking with their little heads. It's not like they're going to make their marriage racket a good deal for men. They need to resort to dirty tricks to keep the grift going.
Financially involved. They couldn't care less about physical.
This seems like a good place to remind everyone of Peterson's real motivation, opposing nationalists (at least for gentiles).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXYuqrO8LLo
venn diagram of things imp and ConsumeProduct hate, Jewish women and Juden peterstein
Jews run pornhub also how is porn pro nationalism
It's not inherently nationalist. For Peterson's case, he is using it to justify destroying internet anonymity which will be used to crack down on opponent's of Jewish nationalism.
Who are those Jews?
The ones crying aboutbanti semitism in their ama even though nobody had mentioned jews
Name them.
Shut down onlyfans. Put whores in prison. Make pornography creation illegal. Go to women's houses and arrest them of they're live streaming themselves getting fucked.
Stop going after "pornhub" and the places that men go to watch porn. Go after the women profiting off simps.
That's how you can tell it has nothing to with "saving the children".
Yup, they don't go after the women, only the men. It's just more anti-male bullshit.
All this is going to become irrelevant soon. We're literally like 10 years away from all porn being entirely AI generated and impossible to stop. In theory women should love this because there's no "human trafficking" but watch how quickly women will complain about men having access to AI generated porn. They will complain because it will hurt women's profitability off simps. That's all this is about. Women hate it when men benefit from women's sexuality. Women want a monopoly on their sexuality so they can profit off simps. Women are perfectly fine with porn if it's women profiting.
Where do these sweeping claims about the mental states of billions of people come from?
And then women can just freely predate on broken men with no outlet for their urges. Fantastic idea.
Is that actually happening?
No.
I can imagine it has happened, but to claim it's part of PornHub's business model sounds like a moral panic. I would assume OnlyFans has more of that going on.
Because MasterCard forced them to, not because they were guilty. And then MasterCard still blocked payments.
That's not real and you should be ashamed of believing such an obvious hoax from the same people who brought you #MeToo.
I don't know if plant is the right word, but like the conservatives he's a convenient stooge at times. There's this weird pathology among conservatives and liberal centrists that we need to find ways to "work together" with people on the left, and that somehow we are winning hearts and minds and closing the ideological gap when we unite over common ground. "Everyone can agree when it comes to protecting our kids!"
People on the right practically get turned on when a stereotypical leftist is willing to join them in the culture wars, without considering "maybe this is a sign I was always on the wrong side here..."
People on the left only take it as confirmation bias that they are on the right side of history, and "those idiot cons" are a stopped clock that's right twice a day, gradually being eliminated through subversion to common sense.
I'm not making any argument about PornHub, which based on its history of copyright violations alone seems like a mob racket that "went clean" by climbing over the dead bodies of their fellow shady porn sites, not unlike other disruptive companies that broke the law until they became stronger than the law. Reminds me of CrunchyRoll in some ways.
didn't peterstein say Kavanaugh should resign for political reconciliation with the left
yes
And he also went on to say that it was a stupid, poorly thought out tweet.
I'm not going to engage with such obvious bait.