Led by the conservatives' best friends, Mastercard and PayPal.
Dude, Mastercard and Paypal in particular are leftists. They've been deplatforming conservatives for many years. The biggest push to get rid of porn comes from the left these days.
The biggest push to get rid of porn comes from the left these days.
I'd argue it's become bi-partisan, like all truly pro-woman issues. Nothing unites left and establishment right like supporting something that harms men.
The problem is that the normal way of getting that need met (a girlfriend or wife who puts out regularly) is becoming less and less feasible for the average man with each passing day. It's a high cost proposition with an extreme amount of risk, and for many men the door is being slammed shut entirely. Porn has its problems, and those problems increase in severity as its consumption gets more frequent and the content itself becomes more degenerate (the tranny problem coinciding with the explosion of porn availability isn't coincidental), but going after porn without dealing with the root cause of its ubiquity misses the forest for the trees.
Isn't your narrative that women created trannies to genocide the men, and now the trannies turned on women and are the key to defeating them? Funny how women alternate between scoring own goals or being 5D chess masters depending on what flavor of bullshit you want to sell.
And you're way behind on having problems with Peterson. Nationalists were calling him out years ago.
Sorry to interject with my opinion, but fir me it's a bit of column A and a bit of column B.
Porn addiction harms men like ANY other non physiological addiction harms men, like gambling. You get too obsessed on a thing, you spend time that could be spent on self improvement or making yourself better off focusing on the addiction. That isn't the thing the women Imp refers to hate it.
What they hate is that a side affect of porn addiction is that the men afflicted by it or men who can just use porn to get off once in a while without addiction, have a release for any sexual tension they have building up (which thanks to today's sexualized society there's a lot of) without requiring being physically involved with a woman. That's the part they hate as it gives them less control. If men aren't slaves to their sexual urges and can think with clear minds, harder to convince them to the stupid shit feminists propose.
Dude, Mastercard and Paypal in particular are leftists. They've been deplatforming conservatives for many years. The biggest push to get rid of porn comes from the left these days.
I know.
I'd argue it's become bi-partisan, like all truly pro-woman issues. Nothing unites left and establishment right like supporting something that harms men.
Internet porn itself harms men. It creates weak, pathetic addicted coomers. If it disappeared overnight men would be so much better off.
The problem is that the normal way of getting that need met (a girlfriend or wife who puts out regularly) is becoming less and less feasible for the average man with each passing day. It's a high cost proposition with an extreme amount of risk, and for many men the door is being slammed shut entirely. Porn has its problems, and those problems increase in severity as its consumption gets more frequent and the content itself becomes more degenerate (the tranny problem coinciding with the explosion of porn availability isn't coincidental), but going after porn without dealing with the root cause of its ubiquity misses the forest for the trees.
If that was the case, women wouldn't attack it.
"porn addiction" was a theory by obese male genocide advocate Andrea Dworkin.
Isn't your narrative that women created trannies to genocide the men, and now the trannies turned on women and are the key to defeating them? Funny how women alternate between scoring own goals or being 5D chess masters depending on what flavor of bullshit you want to sell.
And you're way behind on having problems with Peterson. Nationalists were calling him out years ago.
Anyone with a halfway decent understanding of neuroscience can tell you porn addiction is a real phenomenon.
Sorry to interject with my opinion, but fir me it's a bit of column A and a bit of column B.
Porn addiction harms men like ANY other non physiological addiction harms men, like gambling. You get too obsessed on a thing, you spend time that could be spent on self improvement or making yourself better off focusing on the addiction. That isn't the thing the women Imp refers to hate it.
What they hate is that a side affect of porn addiction is that the men afflicted by it or men who can just use porn to get off once in a while without addiction, have a release for any sexual tension they have building up (which thanks to today's sexualized society there's a lot of) without requiring being physically involved with a woman. That's the part they hate as it gives them less control. If men aren't slaves to their sexual urges and can think with clear minds, harder to convince them to the stupid shit feminists propose.