The PoA is to the republic,not the government. My enlistment oath was to the Constitution,not the presently constituted government. There is a distinct difference between the two, something this dipshit refuses to acknowledge.
Furthermore, this dweeb hasn't seen a real insurrection, because in a real insurrection, his dumb ass would have just as big of a target on it as a local government official would. Why?
Because Clinton rules are in effect. What are those?
In 1998, when NATO went to war against Serbia, Clinton decided that Serbian regime supporters were valid targets under the Rules of Engagement. That means reporters, writers, professors, think tank members, financiers, and the like were all valid targets, and could get a Hellfire missile through the window any time we wanted to.
"This pledge is an affirmation of your defense of democracy and the Constitution," Cicilline. "It’s hard to take that claim seriously if in fact, an individual in any way supported an insurrection against the government."
It’s hard to take that claim seriously if in fact, an individual in any way supported an insurrection against the government
The country founded on an insurrection? The one that specifically leaves provisions in its' constitution to insurrect against a tyrannical government? That country? What an absolute brainlet
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
They do not know the actual founding documentation of their own country, they were deliberately misled about what it says or means, and they should all be treated as true enemies of America until proven otherwise.
Put in another way these faggot people might understand, we did the equivalent of Ron Swanson showing his paper to the police that said "I do what I want" with his own name attached.
This was already voted down, but if we wanted to go that route it might be fun. Remember, they're defining anyone who questions an election result as an insurrectionist. Since not a single Democrat recognized the legitimacy of the 2016 election that entire party would be banned from leading the pledge. Which would be fitting for a bunch of communist traitors.
The PoA is to the republic, not the government. My enlistment oath was to the Constitution, not the presently constituted government. There is a distinct difference between the two, something this dipshit refuses to acknowledge.
Furthermore, this dweeb hasn't seen a real insurrection, because in a real insurrection, his dumb ass would have just as big of a target on it as a local government official would. Why?
Because Clinton rules are in effect. What are those?
In 1998, when NATO went to war against Serbia, Clinton decided that Serbian regime supporters were valid targets under the Rules of Engagement. That means reporters, writers, professors, think tank members, financiers, and the like were all valid targets, and could get a Hellfire missile through the window any time we wanted to.
At best this guy is vaguely aware something happened in Kosovo in the 90s, but he doesn't know or care about the details.
Election tampering is just fine, though.
The country founded on an insurrection? The one that specifically leaves provisions in its' constitution to insurrect against a tyrannical government? That country? What an absolute brainlet
The Declaration of Independence:
They do not know the actual founding documentation of their own country, they were deliberately misled about what it says or means, and they should all be treated as true enemies of America until proven otherwise.
Put in another way these faggot people might understand, we did the equivalent of Ron Swanson showing his paper to the police that said "I do what I want" with his own name attached.
Why does it matter to any Dems? The only thing they're interested in pledging allegiance to is the fag.
And it is absolutely their right to refuse to say it if the leader is bothering them.
This was already voted down, but if we wanted to go that route it might be fun. Remember, they're defining anyone who questions an election result as an insurrectionist. Since not a single Democrat recognized the legitimacy of the 2016 election that entire party would be banned from leading the pledge. Which would be fitting for a bunch of communist traitors.
No it isn't. It says nothing about defense, democracy, or the Constitution.
you deserve "insurrection"
Which is weird because my entire life in school Democrats fucking despised the Pledge of Allegiance