Or maybe you're the splitter and not Sargon. I don't think loli should be a crime so long as no real children are involved, but don't mistake that as support for your deviant tastes.
Question.
Do you think there are healthy people actively looking for fictional underage pornography?
Like normal people are not looking for it, but all the people searching for it are doing it intentionally. What kind of people are those? Do we want to encourage the people who are already looking for that to look for it more?
More and more people talk about your brain being fried and burned out by seeking the thrill. Addiction. Hell, even specifically with porn, needing more and more out there stuff there.
The thing with violent video games is, violence is much more nuanced than fucking children.
Kyle Rittenhouse shooting those criminals is not the same as a gangbanger shooting people from a car, nor is punching another kid when you were 14 in some stupid teen fight in a parking lot. Some justified, some worse, some better. Different motivation, different levels you are willing to go. Things.
No way to justify fucking children. I don't care who you are, what you feel, if you had a bad childhood. Fucking a child is never good.
Are they harmless? We hear more and more people (both men and women, young and old) speak up about porn and its influence on them.
From body issues to problems with understanding boundaries to addiction. The way it moves your sense of right and wrong, seeking more and more stimulus. Normalising sex acts.
Just think of the way kids are being socialised by it to think "BDSM" is great, then later realising it was traumatising. Like seriously, every single typical tiktok kiddie talks about "choke me daddy" and "BDSM relationships are totally normal", then 2 months later they make crying videos about their toxic relationships and abuse.
No, it's not. It's drawn art, not real life. Videogames aren't violence either. Typical old idpol christian Rightwing talking points coming back in style I see.
I don't care if lolisho exists, but it's reason for existing is to arouse people sexually. Saying it's not pedophilic is like saying a video of dudes railings each other isn't gay.
Pedophilia is attraction to a person under the age of 12. Which drawn art isn't. Just like the act of simulating murder in videogames isn't literal murder of a real person.
So, if I jack it to artwork of dudes sodomizing each other, it's not gay? I guess the booru sites are for people attracted to cartoons in each category they're attracted to in real life.
I guess the whole country of Japan is just shockfull of cases of pedophilia rape and sexual abuse of minors. It's a wonder they can even get anything done. They'll be sure to collapse any time now, and bring forth some evil god that's not even part of their religion.
Do you think anyone gives a flying fuck about it depicting non existant children when there is a shitton of videos featuring pornographic acting depicting rape, incest, and necrophilia, and other pieces of pornographic artwork depicting all that and animals?
I swear people who hate mere offensive pornography would rather waste resources on banning it despite the fact it does not incite rape and other sex crimes, instead of putting said resources to better uses such as hunting traffickers who do shit such as produce actual child porn and other unethical forms of pornography.
Is this the logic of "I don't care if we have muggings in this neighbourhood, other countries have mass murder"?
Also, what makes you think we are not equally disgusted? You think we are like the fairies in Peter Pan, too small to care about more than one thing at a time?
Why are you so keen on defending pornography made specifically for people who have pedophilic urges already?
Then you're a hypocrite, and no better than what you claim to oppose. They're also all about identity politics and banning stuff they're against. You're only the flipside coin of their version of authotarianism. Which ends in Theocratic cultures like Islam. A known "ally" of woke TQIA+.
If anything, it's usually those who label lolisho as pedophilic unprovoked who end up being the true predators.
Revsaysdesu literally in a span of just a week covered two individuals who were exposed for sexually abusing minors after they publicly call lolis pedophilia.
The pattern exists but what you said here is key: "unprovoked". A total normie not already immersed in the world of manga would be understandably disturbed by some of this loli shit. You'd wonder why it exists and who the fuck is looking for it. That's just a visceral reaction, not one based on ideology or looking for things to censor, nor a projection of suppressed desire.
Sargon and other host can be likened to the normies here. I can see where they're coming from. If they somehow keep bringing up the topic out of nowhere, then I'd be worried.
I have mass reported every single anti-loli sperg who issued negative responses to me, and I hope the sex traffickers snatch you, rape you and accept payment from predatory punters to rape you all too, and then kill you when they get bored, dumping your worthless corpse into a ditch.
You are all scum for encouraging the waste of police resources and I hope you all die, see you in hell and also consider killing yourselves.
This shit again? Starting to feel like it's the fight that gets started whenever there's something more important to hide.
It's always this poster...
99% chance he is a tranny, he promotes degeneracy and tries to stir up brigades like they do
Or maybe you're the splitter and not Sargon. I don't think loli should be a crime so long as no real children are involved, but don't mistake that as support for your deviant tastes.
Question.
Do you think there are healthy people actively looking for fictional underage pornography?
Like normal people are not looking for it, but all the people searching for it are doing it intentionally. What kind of people are those? Do we want to encourage the people who are already looking for that to look for it more?
More and more people talk about your brain being fried and burned out by seeking the thrill. Addiction. Hell, even specifically with porn, needing more and more out there stuff there.
The thing with violent video games is, violence is much more nuanced than fucking children.
Kyle Rittenhouse shooting those criminals is not the same as a gangbanger shooting people from a car, nor is punching another kid when you were 14 in some stupid teen fight in a parking lot. Some justified, some worse, some better. Different motivation, different levels you are willing to go. Things.
No way to justify fucking children. I don't care who you are, what you feel, if you had a bad childhood. Fucking a child is never good.
Counterpoint: Irredeemably unjustifiable violence in videogames is also OK.
Violence in fiction can be glorified or shown as a bad thing.
Porn is explicitly for your sexual pleasure.
Your arguments make zero sense, also feral porn and pornographic acting depicting rape, incest, and necrophilia is a thing and is legal.
So because those are also legal, should we think they are okay?
It's because those things are legal and more importantly, HARMLESS!
Are they harmless? We hear more and more people (both men and women, young and old) speak up about porn and its influence on them.
From body issues to problems with understanding boundaries to addiction. The way it moves your sense of right and wrong, seeking more and more stimulus. Normalising sex acts.
Just think of the way kids are being socialised by it to think "BDSM" is great, then later realising it was traumatising. Like seriously, every single typical tiktok kiddie talks about "choke me daddy" and "BDSM relationships are totally normal", then 2 months later they make crying videos about their toxic relationships and abuse.
Gab had this fight already, years ago. Torba banned it for a good reason, loli is pedo.
No, it's not. It's drawn art, not real life. Videogames aren't violence either. Typical old idpol christian Rightwing talking points coming back in style I see.
I don't care if lolisho exists, but it's reason for existing is to arouse people sexually. Saying it's not pedophilic is like saying a video of dudes railings each other isn't gay.
No, saying it's pedophilic[SIC] is like saying that violent videogames is literal murder.
No. Pedophilia is just an attraction to children. No action is necessary to be a pedophile. Action is needed to become a murderer.
Something that's designed to stimulate pedophiles is going to be pedophilic by nature of what it is.
Pedophilia is attraction to a person under the age of 12. Which drawn art isn't. Just like the act of simulating murder in videogames isn't literal murder of a real person.
So, if I jack it to artwork of dudes sodomizing each other, it's not gay? I guess the booru sites are for people attracted to cartoons in each category they're attracted to in real life.
I guess the whole country of Japan is just shockfull of cases of pedophilia rape and sexual abuse of minors. It's a wonder they can even get anything done. They'll be sure to collapse any time now, and bring forth some evil god that's not even part of their religion.
If it were 'art', people would not pleasure themselves to it. And what is the justification for pleasuring oneself to images of children?
Never heard if Pinup art? Tijuana Bible art?
I've heard pinup, just don't know what it is.
Art depicting what
Are violent videogames murder?
Do you think anyone gives a flying fuck about it depicting non existant children when there is a shitton of videos featuring pornographic acting depicting rape, incest, and necrophilia, and other pieces of pornographic artwork depicting all that and animals?
I swear people who hate mere offensive pornography would rather waste resources on banning it despite the fact it does not incite rape and other sex crimes, instead of putting said resources to better uses such as hunting traffickers who do shit such as produce actual child porn and other unethical forms of pornography.
Is this the logic of "I don't care if we have muggings in this neighbourhood, other countries have mass murder"?
Also, what makes you think we are not equally disgusted? You think we are like the fairies in Peter Pan, too small to care about more than one thing at a time?
Why are you so keen on defending pornography made specifically for people who have pedophilic urges already?
You can try to argue with me until you are blue in the face. I don't care. My understanding of this issue is satisfied.
I suggest you don't use idpol Christian with me, because I will look you dead in the eye and say, "Yup."
Society is not better off because porn of all types is widely available. On this issue I am NOT a free speech absolutist.
Then you're a hypocrite, and no better than what you claim to oppose. They're also all about identity politics and banning stuff they're against. You're only the flipside coin of their version of authotarianism. Which ends in Theocratic cultures like Islam. A known "ally" of woke TQIA+.
Let him have his views. Whether or not it is 'pedophilic', I don't care, I think it's rather bad.
Go back to discord you iredeemable degenerate
Have fun getting raped by predatory punters due to wasted police resources.
that is quite possibly the lamest justification for "i like to touch myself while looking at pictures of kids"
People who like lolisho find real children ugly.
This is absolutely idiotic.
Bitching about people defending mere offensive pornography does nothing but cause fights.
If anything, it's usually those who label lolisho as pedophilic unprovoked who end up being the true predators.
Revsaysdesu literally in a span of just a week covered two individuals who were exposed for sexually abusing minors after they publicly call lolis pedophilia.
It's an ongoing pattern. Remember Amir0x, the pedophile ex-Neogaf mod? How about Peter Bright, aka DrPizza, the cuck male feminist from Ars Technica? Both were moralfagging about lolis only to be arrested for child porn and soliciting minors, respectively.
The pattern exists but what you said here is key: "unprovoked". A total normie not already immersed in the world of manga would be understandably disturbed by some of this loli shit. You'd wonder why it exists and who the fuck is looking for it. That's just a visceral reaction, not one based on ideology or looking for things to censor, nor a projection of suppressed desire.
Sargon and other host can be likened to the normies here. I can see where they're coming from. If they somehow keep bringing up the topic out of nowhere, then I'd be worried.
"Unprovoked" as in they just moralfag without context.
I hate lolis, but I don't go complaining about them as long as people keep it to themselves. It's a different story if real minors are involved.
I have mass reported every single anti-loli sperg who issued negative responses to me, and I hope the sex traffickers snatch you, rape you and accept payment from predatory punters to rape you all too, and then kill you when they get bored, dumping your worthless corpse into a ditch.
You are all scum for encouraging the waste of police resources and I hope you all die, see you in hell and also consider killing yourselves.
You and that fishy faggot should start a band