Right-wing NPCs
(i.imgur.com)
Comments (42)
sorted by:
Are you fucking retarded? No, seriously. You think China isn't a threat? The CIA is working with them, yes, but the CCP isn't some helpless backwater being used as a puppet for the ruling regime here in the west. They are active participants. Your own fucking government is owned by them, probably more than the EU owns you.
Seems like the problem is our fucking government and not the Chinese.
It's both.
Oh, don't even get me started on those two-faced bastards when it comes to China.
Tell me why Israel should care about hating on China.
Maybe the same reason we don't let the Saudis bomb them to dust.
The Saudis are no fools - they're not picking a fight with a nuclear-armed Israel for literally no reason.
China and Russia dont have buttsex parades.
They aren't the enemy.
I kind of wonder what they are waiting for. It took years of poking the bear to make Ukraine happen. In comparison all they would need to do would be for Biden to say the words, "The United States recognizes Taiwan as an independent country" and China would immediately take the island.
Man, this will make that last chip shortage look like nothing in comparison. It's funny all the plebbitors bitched endlessly about electronics being slightly more expensive under Trump's tariffs, but at least you could still buy them.
A military that isn't a paper tiger?
If the US (and a lot of the western world) had also spent the last 2 decades intertwining their economies, supply lines, and manufacturing with Russia like they have with China, you'd have a point.
Then there is Antonio, sitting in the offices of the NKVD prior to WW2, drawing up the same thing, but with Germany & Japan.
Turns out that the United States has actual, real enemies.
Libtards think the true enemy of America is the Right.
The Right knows that the true enemy of America is China. While the libtards are making our country worse, they are part of our country, not a foreign aggressor.
Office continuity is rather important, y'know.
Itself.
China is an enemy of American hegemony. Because you are in their sphere of influence.
That said, I do agree with American support for Taiwan because unlike Ukraine, it's actually a real country and a successful state.
I'll guarantee you that when America falls, as it will because no empire lasts forever, the causes will be internal and not external.
If America has a civil war or peacefully splits, the Right wing state that results from the split would soon be far more based and powerful than America is now. It won't be the "fall" of America, but a rebirth of America like the phoenix from the ashes.
There must be some process to eliminate the cancer of left wing ideology in the coming decades. If the democratic system fails to do so, then civil war, consolidation, re-conquest, and the purging of leftism will accomplish the same ends through non-democratic means.
The alternative would be a national suicide into some sort of failed state, much like we already have in deep blue cities now. I think there are enough rational people to rise up against that outcome if the lunatics run the asylum through elections.
Which, ironically, happened with Rome too, where Western Rome decayed while Eastern Rome reinvented itself, became Byzantium, and lived for another thousand years as one of the most powerful nations in Europe.
Kind of like how people keep comparing us to the Roman Republic not realizing Rome reached it's height after it overthrew the Republic and became an Empire.
Yeah, I don't think so. Just look at Russia. You'd expect the end of communism to make it more powerful, but due to the fact that it split - and the fact that it can no longer commandeer vast resources from the economy for the military-industrial complex - it is weaker than the USSR, at least according to you.
If there were two Americas perpetually at each other's throats, it would accomplish what the US has done in Eastern Europe: create a Ukraine that is an enemy to Russia and which keeps it busy. Or a Taiwan for China.
I keep being amused by you thinking that there is anything 'democratic' about the elite-run countries in the West, when the last thing they are concerned about is the will of the people.
Just because you call a system democratic doesn't make it that.
I don't agree. The splitting isn't what made Russia weak. You think if Russia still occupied Kazakhstan, it would be mighty again? Of course not. All the economic resources that make Russia relevant today are in Russia, not the outlying former Soviet states.
The true reason that Russia failed to become strong with the fall of communism is the culture of corruption that communism promoted. Communism, being an unworkable system, forced Russians and other communists to "cheat" in a corrupt fashion to bring the rigid inflexible unrealistic communist system into line with something that could function. This corruption, in turn, was suppressed in some but not all of its forms by the state. Once communism fell, the top down state pressure against corruption was removed. So "capitalism" never thrived. Instead, a subverted, captured, manipulated unfree market emerged wherein corruption dominated. A corrupted "capitalism" lacks the core features that make capitalism work: free and open trade. The game is instead rigged so people with corrupt advantages have the deck stacked in their favor, so they aren't kept honest by open competition. That's why Russia is poor. Corruption. Hell, Putin himself is corruption personified. He is the kingpin of a state built on corruption.
The Red America would not be corrupt, it would be a superior state in terms of values and laws and systems than the America we have now, since it wouldn't have the blue half dragging it down.
Nah. We wouldn't fight. Over decades, the Red states would pull ahead of the Blue economically, and then when the disparity became great enough, we would re-absorb the Blues through force and purge the Leftists in order to rebuild their failed states.
Why do politicians spend billions on ads if they don't think votes matter because the system is rigged? Seems like a foolish waste of money. Why do they aggressively make campaign stops in battleground states? Why is literally everything they do perfectly aligned with what a person who actually believes that America is a democracy governed by the voters would do? Seems like an enormous waste of time and money when they could just have a meeting in a dark room with the "elites" like Putin would, and save themselves the trouble.
I think losing half your population definitely hurts you in terms of power. Of course, the Russian heartland was subsidizing the poorer areas in Central Asia and for some reason the richer Baltic states, but the state as a whole was better off with 300+ million people rather than 150 million.
Particularly the Ukrainian SSR was a prize: with a Slavic population of nearly 50 million.
Russia was corrupt before communism, during communism and after communism.
But the blue half, if it is half, has more than half of its GDP and about half of its population.
That is very optimistic. But there is no reason to believe that such countries would not be at each other's throats. The Confederacy and Union were immediately, after all.
Because the ads are about which puppet will execute the will of the elites. Obviously, everyone wants to be president, even if you hold very little power when you hold that position.
Literally nothing is. Everything that happens, is in accordance with the preferences of the elites. This is not just my own observation. See the Princeton studies. Similar studies have shown that other Western so called democracies are really oligarchies.
Even Putin goes through the charade of an election, and for the same reason. People are more obedient when they think that what those idiot politicians do is 'the will of the people', when it's really the will of the lobbyists, MNOs and elites.
I would think watching the war in Ukraine, you can see population does not equal power. That hasn't been true to some degree dating back to WW2, with Japan being able to generally defeat the Chinese despite having a much smaller population, but it's only become far more exaggerated since then. A small rich nation like Singapore is a lot more powerful than a big poor nation like Madagascar even though Madagascar has a 5x higher population. GDP, technological sophistication, and doctrine matter by far the most. Manpower plays a very minor role now.
Technically you can go back to the 1800s and the British Zulu war, or the Spanish conquest of the Aztecs, to see examples of how a much smaller, but better organized and technologically sophisticated force can crush a much larger one.
Half of America's GDP is still the strongest country in the world. The Red US would have a large majority of America's land area, probably over 90%, and all the natural resources. Blue America would just have the west coast and northeast, basically. The Blues would be highly dependent on the Reds for things like power, food, and most everything else. Thing about liberals is that they concentrate so completely in urban cores.
That's different, because the Confederacy was clearly weaker on paper and everyone knew it. So when they got mad about not getting their way politically and said "ok then, we'll leave", the much more confident North thought that beating the South down would be a walk over. Nobody really thought it would be a long, bloody war, or they might not have started it.
Obviously there would be some conflict in some form, but not a whole "Civil War". The reason being that the Red states would be more powerful. They'd have the majority of the land, military, and resources. So the Blues wouldn't have the same confidence the Union did. Most Blues would be happy to have a national divorce.
I think the main issue that would arise if that most large Blue states have most of their land areas as Red. These Red areas would want to join the Red country, and the Blues might try to stop them. I think they'd fail militarily, and then we'd end up with a solution where you'd have county-level votes for which country to join to settle it.
That doesn't follow. People wouldn't want to be president if it's just a puppet position. Trump certainly wasn't anyone's puppet. Biden is, but that's highly unusual and a special case. Obama, GWB, Clinton, Bush, Reagan weren't.
Uhh, except the Trump Presidency actually happened. American elites are overwhelmingly left wing, and yet GWB won, and Republicans win all the time.
It's obviously a charade when he does it, though, same with other authoritarian states.
It is if you use it. Sure, all the rest helps. But GDP of Russia is something like 5 times higher per capita than your vassal. Technology and doctrine will likely be much better as well. Ukraine had more of one thing: endless hordes to send to their deaths.
I'm surprised you don't know the real reason the Spanish prevailed over the Aztecs. It had nothing to do with technology, except perhaps their armor.
Sounds good, but both would be very much weakened by this. Look, I think it's great for the US to be weakened, but that is also why I think this would never happen. You simply are not going to have two states that are at near parity bordering on each other, while they're at peace.
Story of basically every war. Why did you think I was very much in favor of ending the Russia-Ukraine war ASAP, even with conditions you claimed amounted to a Russian defeat?
Won't this lead to CRAZY amounts of fragmentation? Oh, we're a county here in the middle of blue, but we're red. How do we cross to red?
Trump could get nothing done, because he stood against those who actually wield power. I hope DeSantis would be able to evade them, but I am not optimistic. Neither am I sure that he is not just another establishment type pretending to be a Trumpist. He just seems too good to be true.
As for the rest. They carried out the wishes of the elites, so yeah, they are puppets. But president is still very prestigious, so people want to be president.
The "Trump presidency" got nothing done. Republicans are useless. Bush was a Democrat who accomplished one thing, which is enrichting the military-industrial complex. Oh, and Roberts and Alito. I'll give him credit for the one good thing he did. But that was after he tried putting his cleaning lady on the Supreme Court.
Also when the Americans do it. Remember how it was supposed to be Jeb vs. Hillary? Neocon 1 vs. Neocon 2. Wow, so much choice. And when Neocon 1 lost, they did everything to make Neocon 2 win, which would have happened except for a series of freak incidents and Trump's ability to withstand attack.
>polluting the air
>poisoning children
>bankrupting our country
>funding progressive psy ops in the west
>flooding the seas with plastics
>unsafe work conditions
>child labor
I sleep
>heckin islamophobia
REAL SHIT
Really displays how much neocons care about things that the MSM doesn't tell them to be mad about
Then what is the truth about the Uighurs? The chinese goverment routinely plants their people in the territories they annexed to take over and oversee the local population, then rapidly depopulate those that resist and force others into cities they control.
It's not as bad, but China's still fucking evil and makes the swamp running the U.S. jealous. Hence the recent bullshit from Dems like the 'donate' organs for time off their prison sentence.
Their own people believe they have lost the mandate of heaven.
I'll give you an upvote if you change the logo to Northrop's.
Wasn't my work. I'm not talented enough to mash up several logos together. Besides, the CIA was led by a... WOMAN a while back. Gina Haspel.
Or you could go with the DNI Avril Haines, who the CIA and FBI report to.
Interesting fact about her, she used to work for Palantir Technologies. Yes, the same one run by "right wing" billionaire Peter Thiel.
It's one big club and you aren't in it.
And neither is Peter Thiel, because he's not a woman.
There are no shortage of male collaborators to the cause. While some are controlled morons like Fetterwoman and Boris Johnson, some are just lusting after power and money.
So I'll ask again: how are you ever going to win a majority?
How am I going to win a majority? I won't, too many skeletons in my closet to win a state seat, let alone national.
Besides, even if I could win, I wouldn't be eligible to sit as President.
For your great ideas.