Then framing the issue as less of an attack on women and more of a defence of boys to try and build a coalition of the majority of the male vote + older women + women with sons.

Aren't you always telling me that women with sons secretly want to slit their throats or something?

Anyway. This actually sounds fairly sane, at least by your standards. This is also why DeVos revoked the 'Dear Colleague' guideline forcing universities to run roughshod over due process.

So what exactly is the purpose of your admitted hatred for women? If your strategy, at least your realistic ones, relies on some women supporting you.

If we win, we can carefully fix things without harming those that backed us.

???

Not harm women? Are you feeling alright?

If we lose, we know that women will only back female supremacists.

The problem is that at least about 40% of men vote for anti-male candidates. In part because it's not the only issue, and for some because they support it.