Stonetoss on Roiland
(stonetoss.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (54)
sorted by:
The innocent 16 year old girl he was “grooming” became an onlyfans thott as soon as she turned 18. She specializes in “financial domination”, which is a fetish centered around taking money from older men. Her nickname is Holita, an obvious reference.
At what point do we acknowledge the agency of teenage girls, who are actually “of age” in the vast majority of states and nations, in their relationships with men?
Bro, I heard a grown women unironically say "underaged 21 year old".
You have to fucking pry that mentality of their head.
That's been a big thing lately. Apparently if you're under 25 you're underaged even if you're 18. Also even men in there mid 20s are only supposed to date their age or older. Totally not something older women are pushing because they rode the carousel
Because it's not actually about the age. It's about saying whatever is needed to avoid any kind of accountability. For any woman.
Millennial women think any kind of age gap in a relationship is a sex crime now, coincidentally just as the egg cartons are running empty for them.
Age of Consent Laws in 2025 : If the man is 3 years older than her then it is statutory rape
Conspiracy theory: that's his fetish, and he groomed her into it. Now she thinks it's a thing men want, so she's trying to continue the grift, not realizing that only the most diseased and broken men have any interest.
It's a controversial take but I agree that 16 year olds have sexual/romantic agency. At the very least it's weird that people act like it's in the same ballpark as prepubescents. We have age of consent laws for good reason but it's stupid when people think 17 years and 364 days is magically different from 18 years.
But they're still young and inexperienced, and relationships with significant age gaps can be predatory.
Plus, Roiland was creepy as fuck in his messages with her.
Well things like that are why we used to have things like parental approval and communal shunning to vet and dissuade the older party from trying anything abusive.
But now we have no communities, and god forbid any girl actually have a father let alone him having the ability to veto her dating a guy. All that was discarded.
"How dare you try to control your daughters body you creep"
"Omg why didn't anyone stop this creep from preying on her."
Same argument as troons regretting transitioning.
Then: How dare you tell me what to do?
Now, minus penis/tits: Why didn't you tell me what to do?
Those numbers aren't absolute which is the entire point of the AoC being set at 18. There are some who will have started and finished puberty before they are 10. They will be outliers but it happens. Conversely late development can mean even those who are 18 and over may not yet have finished going through puberty.
So laws attempt to come up with a number that works for almost all cases however life being the crazy box of frogs that it is "finds a way" to cause trouble.
I was rocking full facial hair by the time I was 10
For extra numbery fuckery [not that kind, calm down] the way leap years work someone can be 17 years and 367 days old and still not be legally 18.
Grooming is bad whether or not the underage girl you are grooming is 'innocent'.
And many grooming victims act out in weird ways because of the grooming.
"Anyway, back to the age of consent".
The age of consent in my country (a Western one) is 16.
There are far fewer countries in the world that have an age of consent above 16 than there are who don't. That age seems entirely reasonable to me, and I don't think that it makes me a paedophile to say so.
Well you're only a pedophile if you are attracted to pre pubescent children. You're still a creep if you go after a 16 year old
Why though? I think sane people who say that think of a 17-year-old having a 16 girlfriend, but truth is, this does give blanket permission for 60-year-olds to go after 16-year-olds. I don't think that is very reasonable.
Would it make you feel more comfortable if the 60 year old was going after an 18 year old? They're physically similar, and have about the same level of maturity. Or do you think the age of consent should be 21?
Sounds to me like your problem is not with the age being 16, but rather with big age gaps. Is a law limiting that, the kind of legislation you'd like to see implemented?