I know, it's wrong to blame the victim and nobody is asking for it and all that. But god damn, at some point you need to exercise some self control, situational awareness, and sound judgment.
Because none of them drove the car which hit her. They dropped her off at an apartment complex, presumably near where she lived, and she was struck by an uber driver while wandering around.
Now, consider the following: if they had not abducted and raped her, would she still be dead? Probably not. Ergo, but for their act, she would still be alive. It's murder.
Ok but murder has specific requirements in the statute. I know in Clown World we now just prosecute people over feels and the latest two-minute hates, but that's the technical reason. The DA did not think he could prove that those legal requirements were met.
Ok but murder has specific requirements in the statute.
I don't know the specific language in this state, but what I asserted isn't exactly far off. If I dump you dead drunk somewhere where you have no idea where you are, and you end up dying hit by a car, that is murder in my jurisdiction - and rightly so.
The DA did not think he could prove that those legal requirements were met.
I don't know the specific language in this state, but what I asserted isn't exactly far off. If I dump you dead drunk somewhere where you have no idea where you are, and you end up dying hit by a car, that is murder in my jurisdiction - and rightly so.
I don't know if LA has a felony murder rule or not - if so, the prosecution could choose to pursue that angle.
Kicking her out of the car on a freeway is a Murder I charge. Dropping her off on the sidewalk would be manslaughter at best, unless the State can charge them with her death in the commission (cleanup) of a felony (rape).
The Felony Murder concept is bullshit, anyways. You are responsible for the consequences of your actions, not those of other people.
At that point, the mean BAC of people who died of alcohol poisoning is more relevant.
I'd wager I've been in that ballpark, and it's not a fun neighborhood to visit.
I know, it's wrong to blame the victim and nobody is asking for it and all that. But god damn, at some point you need to exercise some self control, situational awareness, and sound judgment.
no it isn't
What he said
How can they exercise sound judgement when the whole of societal messaging is that niggers aren't dangerous, because racism or something.
Damn black white dude. It's Louisiana. Scumbags are going to be in all stripes because the whole state is shit with shit people.
niggers commit a lot more crimes regardless of where they are
Maybe I'm just biased because it's Louisiana but I'd be shocked if white people weren't just as criminal in Louisiana.
I'm well aware of crime stats my undergrad was in CJ my honky
Islam is so right about women. They shouldn't be allowed outside of their father or husband's homes without a male relative escorting them.
Do they not realize they make the race more obvious by not saying the race or bending over backwards to avoid it?
To the article's credit, it does include mug shots of the three adult crooks, and you can see plain as day two of them are black.
I thought all three were black. At least by American standards, where people lighter than I am and who have blue eyes are called 'black'.
I can't tell what the third guy is honestly. Could be black, could be Latino, or could be white with a tan or dull lighting.
Oh ok. A picture didn’t pull up for me.
Why are they not charged with murder?
Because none of them drove the car which hit her. They dropped her off at an apartment complex, presumably near where she lived, and she was struck by an uber driver while wandering around.
Presumably?
Say you're dead drunk and I 'drop you off' at a highway after raping you.
Seems like I'm a tiny bit culpable for your death, innit?
The article says "they later dropped Brooks off at a nearby subdivision". That's not the same as "abandoned on a highway."
Yes, I gave an example. Or nearby a highway.
Now, consider the following: if they had not abducted and raped her, would she still be dead? Probably not. Ergo, but for their act, she would still be alive. It's murder.
Ok but murder has specific requirements in the statute. I know in Clown World we now just prosecute people over feels and the latest two-minute hates, but that's the technical reason. The DA did not think he could prove that those legal requirements were met.
I don't know the specific language in this state, but what I asserted isn't exactly far off. If I dump you dead drunk somewhere where you have no idea where you are, and you end up dying hit by a car, that is murder in my jurisdiction - and rightly so.
Or maybe he was funded by Soros,
Holy shit, Tony. At best it is criminal negligence. As in, it could have been reasonably foreseen that she'd come to serious harm.
Intending to kill someone, then carrying out that plan is not the same as negligence. Not even in California.
Lol please
Phew, dodged a bullet there.
gradually i began to hate him
Uh, where's the proof she was raped, big guy?
A completely sloshed person is unable to consent in that jurisdiction
Did you read the article? One of the guys confessed it.
C'mon man you know the police clearly coerced him into "confessing"
I'm just fucking with you, it's cuz he's black, right? Of course he raped her haha ;)
I do?
Leave Ali G. out of this, racist.
I don't know if LA has a felony murder rule or not - if so, the prosecution could choose to pursue that angle.
Kicking her out of the car on a freeway is a Murder I charge. Dropping her off on the sidewalk would be manslaughter at best, unless the State can charge them with her death in the commission (cleanup) of a felony (rape).
The Felony Murder concept is bullshit, anyways. You are responsible for the consequences of your actions, not those of other people.