You can talk shit about literally every other demographic on the planet, to be met with varying degrees of pushback. But mention the tribe and you either get totally destroyed or forced to destroy others on their behalf. Without exception.
How is this healthy? How is this sustainable? To have only one group off limits for discussion or criticism, under threat of total financial and social annihilation by that very same group… who then turn around and claim they have no such power. It’s a blatant flex at this point - a humiliation ritual.
It’s embarrassing that there are still so many apologists even here.
Yup. Just as we have a black and LGBT supremacy problem. These groups demand fealty, special protections, endless celebration, and the total destruction of anyone who doesn’t enthusiastically kiss the ring - and then they have the audacity to call themselves oppressed.
Whites ask for dignity and mutual respect, and we are called supremacists and Nazis.
He blocked me and I didn't say anything disrespectful, just told him to wait as more information comes to light. So much for free speech and free thinking when you're blocking people for that.
He's at least willing to say that Jews overwhelmingly control entertainment. That's more than I expect out of most people. As for him asking why it's a problem, well, the fact is that the whole conversation isn't palatable to most people. Most people don't want to say it's an issue because even suggesting that Jews have a disproportional amount of power might get you fucking arrested in some countries. I mean, he is British. Need to keep the temper tampered.
I like the citation from 1997 they put up as proof that the raw number of times innocuous words were tweeted is proof of misogyny.
Taking as its starting point the category text (as opposed to clause, collocation span, sentence etc.) this paper proposes and illustrates a method of identifying key words in text, and leads from this to the notion of key key words (words that are key in many texts). A key key word is shown to have associates: words that are key in the same texts as a given key key word. Finally, these associates can be grouped together in clumps, which themselves are revealing about text schemata and stereotype. The number of clumps in which any key key word participates relates not to ambiguity but to a diversity of perceived roles; the members of the clump describe and illuminate these stereotypical roles.
Translation - we think there are keywords that the very presence of, regardless of context, indicate a certain stereotype is believed in. Sometimes these words don't actually correlate with the stereotype we say they do, so we call those key-key words and rather than admit our methods are ambiguous and unreliable we'll call them diverse because we just fucking can, and now they're diverse no-one can criticize what we say these vulnerable words of color mean.
Those claiming "not all women" to focus on the defence of women, rather than critiquing the sociocultural dominance of feminist behaviour, ignore the hate experienced by all men and boys through the speech of these groups.
It's fun when you can use their own words against them.
So the part where he acknowledged that Jews control finance, media, entertainment, etc., and then went on to say it didn’t matter… made sense to you? His is the most incoherent stance of all.
I interpret the "and?" to be not "it doesn't matter that this group of Jewish people control Hollywood" but "how does a few dozen turbo rich Jewish families at the top of media prove that the random Jewish guy in your suburb is part of the conspiracy?"
He's trying to make a distinction between "all Jews control the media" and "a group of wealthy, Jewish people with specific insider connections control it".
So the part where he acknowledged that Jews control finance, media, entertainment, etc
It's as stupid as the claim that "white men control the Senate", simply because they're in the majority. How much more stupid is it when a given group is not even in the majority?
and then went on to say it didn’t matter… made sense to you? His is the most incoherent stance of all.
Why? I'm not a SJW who demands that populations be equally 'represented' in various groups.
If a Jew in media is pushing Social Justice, I don't like him. If a Jew in media is pushing anti-Social Justice, I do like him. The Jewishness of the fellow has nothing to do with it. Why should it?
We have empirical evidence that different demographics behave differently. Whites, for instance, have a net neutral bias regarding their own racial cohort. This means that a governing body of whites is far more likely than non-whites to treat all racial demographics fairly. This absence of racial bias among whites is why white nations are being overrun by non-white immigration.
Meanwhile, Jews are notoriously insular, nepotistic, and biased in favor of their own ethnic cohort. It is therefore a very different issue when they are wildly overrepresented among a governing or influential body that also impacts other ethnic and racial cohorts.
TLDR: ditch the retarded notion that all demographics are magically the same. That equalist nonsense has no place in our Darwin reality.
Also: your hypothetical of Jews opposing social justice bullshit is a comical self-own. If there were a plurality of Jews calling out their own globalist elites and Bolshevik subversives, then there would be no animosity towards Jewish power. But there is no such plurality. Instead, at the mere hint of opposition to Jewish power, Jews circle the wagons around the tribe. Their ethnic tribal loyalty comes first, always. The elites have successfully conflated Jewishness with their globalist agenda. Common Jews need to aggressively separate themselves from that initiative. It begins with acknowledgment and declaration.
See your whole schizo take falls apart when you fail to acknowledge that Jews are insular even with other Jews. You think the atheistic(see also leftist) jews that control large swathes of the the media are worried about or including random Joe Stein the brick layer in their circle or even on the fringe of it? Hell fucking no
Whites, for instance, have a net neutral bias regarding their own racial cohort.
This obscures differences among whites. Liberal whites dislike their own race, while conservative whites are just like any other racial group.
This means that a governing body of whites is far more likely than non-whites to treat all racial demographics fairly.
Not if it's white liberals. They like to kick down the ladder for whites (and Asians).
Meanwhile, Jews are notoriously insular, nepotistic, and biased in favor of their own ethnic cohort.
Please show me the left-wing Jews who are nepotistic and biased in favor of, say, Ben Shapiro. Or other Jews who are not crazy maniacs.
TLDR: ditch the retarded notion that all demographics are magically the same.
I don't say they are. I just say that they're not magically bad. They're just people, same as you.
If there were a plurality of Jews calling out their own globalist elites and Bolshevik subversives, then there would be no animosity towards Jewish power.
And if there was a majority of whites calling out globalist elites, we wouldn't have the problem to begin with. So by your own standards, whites are the devil.
It's not the special responsibility of Jews to combat people who are Jews, no more than it's my responsibility to combat Osama bin Laden.
But there is no such plurality. Instead, at the mere hint of opposition to Jewish power, Jews circle the wagons around the tribe.
And considering that the actions of crazies who have spread the notion that "Jews control the world", I can certainly imagine why.
Common Jews need to aggressively separate themselves from that initiative.
That certainly would be great. But it's not excuse to go after apolitical people for not doing that. Most people don't do that sort of thing, unfortunately.
At least he acknowledged it as true. Some would call Zuby an anti-semite just for that.
It's the 'And?' part that gets me.
AND it fucking matters that western media is so heavily, so disproportionately controlled by a tiny, deeply insular ethnic group.
not just the media. The global banks and the politics as well.
Hey, don't forget the huge slice of the Military Industrial Complex that they own!
You can talk shit about literally every other demographic on the planet, to be met with varying degrees of pushback. But mention the tribe and you either get totally destroyed or forced to destroy others on their behalf. Without exception.
How is this healthy? How is this sustainable? To have only one group off limits for discussion or criticism, under threat of total financial and social annihilation by that very same group… who then turn around and claim they have no such power. It’s a blatant flex at this point - a humiliation ritual.
It’s embarrassing that there are still so many apologists even here.
I’m not an anti-Semite.
I am tired of far-left extremist Jewish supremacists like Jonathan Greenblatt and Ari Emmanuel telling me what I am and am not allowed to say.
America has a Jewish extremism problem.
Yup. Just as we have a black and LGBT supremacy problem. These groups demand fealty, special protections, endless celebration, and the total destruction of anyone who doesn’t enthusiastically kiss the ring - and then they have the audacity to call themselves oppressed.
Whites ask for dignity and mutual respect, and we are called supremacists and Nazis.
“White supremacist” is an anti-white slur
Wow, literally everyone but women. I'll say it.
The USA has a female supremacy problem.
https://nitter.net/ZubyMusic/status/1588026130937913345
He blocked me and I didn't say anything disrespectful, just told him to wait as more information comes to light. So much for free speech and free thinking when you're blocking people for that.
He's at least willing to say that Jews overwhelmingly control entertainment. That's more than I expect out of most people. As for him asking why it's a problem, well, the fact is that the whole conversation isn't palatable to most people. Most people don't want to say it's an issue because even suggesting that Jews have a disproportional amount of power might get you fucking arrested in some countries. I mean, he is British. Need to keep the temper tampered.
Zuby is afraid.
He sees what is happening to Kanye West and Kyrie Irving who are much more famous and wealthier than him.
He knows what happens to anyone that has even a remotely sizable audience and says anything negative about this demographic.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211695822000198
Considering women reject the idea that not all men are responsible for rape, why can't we say #YesAllWomen?
I like the citation from 1997 they put up as proof that the raw number of times innocuous words were tweeted is proof of misogyny.
Translation - we think there are keywords that the very presence of, regardless of context, indicate a certain stereotype is believed in. Sometimes these words don't actually correlate with the stereotype we say they do, so we call those key-key words and rather than admit our methods are ambiguous and unreliable we'll call them diverse because we just fucking can, and now they're diverse no-one can criticize what we say these vulnerable words of color mean.
They do?
https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/15K6zdr9xQ/those-using-the-hashtag-notallme/c
Are you scared of links? I literally posted the source of their hate-filled screed about people who say "men aren't all evil".
I missed where this was endorsed by "all women". I'm sure you just forgot to post your abundant proof for that.
I swear he's militantly gay.
Like actual bushido was. "Why would you want to be with a mere WOMAN?"
🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
Those claiming "not all women" to focus on the defence of women, rather than critiquing the sociocultural dominance of feminist behaviour, ignore the hate experienced by all men and boys through the speech of these groups.
It's fun when you can use their own words against them.
Then stop being batshit crazy and attacking all women, as you do without evidence. Then you don't give people such avenues for attack.
Being sane is a solution, if you are capable of it.
Agreed, but you actually believe in this crap.
I see nothing with which to disagree in Zuby's comments.
So the part where he acknowledged that Jews control finance, media, entertainment, etc., and then went on to say it didn’t matter… made sense to you? His is the most incoherent stance of all.
I interpret the "and?" to be not "it doesn't matter that this group of Jewish people control Hollywood" but "how does a few dozen turbo rich Jewish families at the top of media prove that the random Jewish guy in your suburb is part of the conspiracy?"
He's trying to make a distinction between "all Jews control the media" and "a group of wealthy, Jewish people with specific insider connections control it".
It's as stupid as the claim that "white men control the Senate", simply because they're in the majority. How much more stupid is it when a given group is not even in the majority?
Why? I'm not a SJW who demands that populations be equally 'represented' in various groups.
If a Jew in media is pushing Social Justice, I don't like him. If a Jew in media is pushing anti-Social Justice, I do like him. The Jewishness of the fellow has nothing to do with it. Why should it?
We have empirical evidence that different demographics behave differently. Whites, for instance, have a net neutral bias regarding their own racial cohort. This means that a governing body of whites is far more likely than non-whites to treat all racial demographics fairly. This absence of racial bias among whites is why white nations are being overrun by non-white immigration.
Meanwhile, Jews are notoriously insular, nepotistic, and biased in favor of their own ethnic cohort. It is therefore a very different issue when they are wildly overrepresented among a governing or influential body that also impacts other ethnic and racial cohorts.
TLDR: ditch the retarded notion that all demographics are magically the same. That equalist nonsense has no place in our Darwin reality.
Also: your hypothetical of Jews opposing social justice bullshit is a comical self-own. If there were a plurality of Jews calling out their own globalist elites and Bolshevik subversives, then there would be no animosity towards Jewish power. But there is no such plurality. Instead, at the mere hint of opposition to Jewish power, Jews circle the wagons around the tribe. Their ethnic tribal loyalty comes first, always. The elites have successfully conflated Jewishness with their globalist agenda. Common Jews need to aggressively separate themselves from that initiative. It begins with acknowledgment and declaration.
See your whole schizo take falls apart when you fail to acknowledge that Jews are insular even with other Jews. You think the atheistic(see also leftist) jews that control large swathes of the the media are worried about or including random Joe Stein the brick layer in their circle or even on the fringe of it? Hell fucking no
This obscures differences among whites. Liberal whites dislike their own race, while conservative whites are just like any other racial group.
Not if it's white liberals. They like to kick down the ladder for whites (and Asians).
Please show me the left-wing Jews who are nepotistic and biased in favor of, say, Ben Shapiro. Or other Jews who are not crazy maniacs.
I don't say they are. I just say that they're not magically bad. They're just people, same as you.
And if there was a majority of whites calling out globalist elites, we wouldn't have the problem to begin with. So by your own standards, whites are the devil.
It's not the special responsibility of Jews to combat people who are Jews, no more than it's my responsibility to combat Osama bin Laden.
And considering that the actions of crazies who have spread the notion that "Jews control the world", I can certainly imagine why.
That certainly would be great. But it's not excuse to go after apolitical people for not doing that. Most people don't do that sort of thing, unfortunately.