I like the citation from 1997 they put up as proof that the raw number of times innocuous words were tweeted is proof of misogyny.
Taking as its starting point the category text (as opposed to clause, collocation span, sentence etc.) this paper proposes and illustrates a method of identifying key words in text, and leads from this to the notion of key key words (words that are key in many texts). A key key word is shown to have associates: words that are key in the same texts as a given key key word. Finally, these associates can be grouped together in clumps, which themselves are revealing about text schemata and stereotype. The number of clumps in which any key key word participates relates not to ambiguity but to a diversity of perceived roles; the members of the clump describe and illuminate these stereotypical roles.
Translation - we think there are keywords that the very presence of, regardless of context, indicate a certain stereotype is believed in. Sometimes these words don't actually correlate with the stereotype we say they do, so we call those key-key words and rather than admit our methods are ambiguous and unreliable we'll call them diverse because we just fucking can, and now they're diverse no-one can criticize what we say these vulnerable words of color mean.
Those claiming "not all women" to focus on the defence of women, rather than critiquing the sociocultural dominance of feminist behaviour, ignore the hate experienced by all men and boys through the speech of these groups.
It's fun when you can use their own words against them.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211695822000198
Considering women reject the idea that not all men are responsible for rape, why can't we say #YesAllWomen?
I like the citation from 1997 they put up as proof that the raw number of times innocuous words were tweeted is proof of misogyny.
Translation - we think there are keywords that the very presence of, regardless of context, indicate a certain stereotype is believed in. Sometimes these words don't actually correlate with the stereotype we say they do, so we call those key-key words and rather than admit our methods are ambiguous and unreliable we'll call them diverse because we just fucking can, and now they're diverse no-one can criticize what we say these vulnerable words of color mean.
They do?
https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/15K6zdr9xQ/those-using-the-hashtag-notallme/c
Are you scared of links? I literally posted the source of their hate-filled screed about people who say "men aren't all evil".
I missed where this was endorsed by "all women". I'm sure you just forgot to post your abundant proof for that.
I swear he's militantly gay.
Like actual bushido was. "Why would you want to be with a mere WOMAN?"
Those claiming "not all women" to focus on the defence of women, rather than critiquing the sociocultural dominance of feminist behaviour, ignore the hate experienced by all men and boys through the speech of these groups.
It's fun when you can use their own words against them.