Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

38
()
posted 3 years ago by TheImpossible1 3 years ago by TheImpossible1 +38 / -0
61 comments share
61 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (61)
sorted by:
▲ 20 ▼
– deleted 20 points 3 years ago +20 / -0
▲ 12 ▼
– deleted 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0
▲ 10 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

Huh, an unarchived link to a media source with a scary woman Editor-in-Chief?

Didn't know you to go so easy on people who want you tortured, killed and then laugh while you lie dying...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Federalist got jewed a while ago

And I wouldn't say they represent conservative anything. They are basically apologists for leftists. "Oh so sorry that the ebil paleos are naming you. Real (tm) conservatives love Israel"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Federalist got jewed a while ago

Excuse me?

"Oh so sorry that the ebil paleos are naming you. Real (tm) conservatives love Israel"

Yeah, they do.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Is this the first time you have heard about the Brookings Institute?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I remember that idiot that runs it suggested a child support reform bull (bull is the right word, autocorrect, but you need the second part) that didn't include forcing the woman to allow a paternity test to release funds.

You're mad because there was a child support plan that didn't include a requirement for paternity tests?

Then there was a weird idea of boys starting school later to "help them develop"

I'm sure that definitely happened.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I'm not taking a position one way or the other - though my position is probably closer to yours.

I'm just saying that the Imp is batshit crazy for denouncing a reform proposal which he has not read because it does not include something that he would like to see.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Just the voice of experience. He makes all sorts of crazy claims.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Yes. It's literally the bare minimum to reform it, to ensure nobody's stuck providing for someone else's child.

So no comment on the rest of the plan? Did you even read it? You're just throwing a tantrum because it didn't include what you wanted.

I always have the archives. Notice where he published it? There's the link to the Silicon Valley whore brigade again.

Stop making archives using bad URLs, dumbass, that can be used to track you down.

The reason little boys wear almost all of the red shirts is not mysterious; the fact that boys mature later than girls is one known to every parent

The whole article is just a thin defence of the teaching profession that suggested they aren't to blame for boys doing worse

Based on what?

which aged like fucking milk when an Italian study confirmed that yes

Even if replicated, it would not automatically explain why boys do worse, dumbass.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
... continue reading thread?
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 9 ▼
– deleted 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0
▲ 11 ▼
– WhoIsThatMaskedMan 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

Objectively true. Just about every Republican I know, especially the older ones, are the "women shouldn't suffer consequences ever" types. Anything bad that happens to a woman is because society is evil and hates women. Anything good that happens to a woman is because she's a strong queen who's slayin' it.

If there's one thing both sides can agree on, it's gynocentrism.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– el_hoovy 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

nobody tell him the rise in landwhale dyke whores is due to (((left-wing))) hatred of women too...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– el_hoovy 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Maybe in your stupid stormcuck heads.

didn't know the jidf hired children... man, what do they do to you there? nevermind, i don't care

After all, you don't believe that women can be bad people.

and you regularly advocate for septic tank bathing

wait, we're not playing two truths and a lie or something, right?

I'm sure you could point to some of this "women hatred", so I can laugh at how pathetic your examples are.

if you think the aforementioned landwhale dyke whores are totally living it up to their fullest at the expense of men you should probably follow in their footsteps and die of heart disease or something

actually you probably already are following the whole landwhale thing

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– Devidose 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

You,

Ad hominems are not a substitute for evidence

Also you,

Maybe in your stupid stormcuck heads

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– el_hoovy 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

healthy at any weight is directly destructive to mainly women since they seem to have the highest propensity to get fat

promoting whoredom is destructive to men and women equally since neither end up happy

the neurotic social media state we live in affects women the most since they are most emotional and affected by perceived social standing, leading to many of them becoming nervous wrecks

the LG TV movement: feminine men's genelines are doomed, masculine women's lines the same

the effects you keep rattling on about for your 0.12 shekels per post are simply the powers that shouldn't be seeking, truthfully, mainly, to destroy our men, because those are most likely to actually rise up and hang them. women ultimately conform even to the highest evils since it is in their blood to do so and require less overt destruction - it doesn't matter if they're poor, rich, ostracized or popular, when another White Genocidal law comes into effect, the women are just gonna shrug without any men around to tell them how dire it is.

but White (and other races too ultimately, but first and foremost this one which is ours) men and women suffer equally. neither are happy. the smile of the modern woman means as much as the smile of the modern soyboy holding his nindendi switchy, no matter how many dollars per month she gets from her divorced husband to spend on makeup.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– el_hoovy 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

i-it's just backfiring!!!

pathetic

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
... continue reading thread?
▲ 3 ▼
– JiggsawCalrissian 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

"They want to know what it's like to have control over something that's controlled by an unlikable creature" - Patrice Oneal

I believe there's a correlation absolutely. The scariest aspect are the ones claiming trans identity specifically out of awareness for how it insulates you from any backlash for your actions in clown world.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Yes all women what?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Yup, it's all women's fault.

Such a whiny little prick, and that without even having a real prick.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

How about you show me your claim that "Women's response to the masculinity crisis is one of contempt and derision".

Thank you.

Also, how come the Brookings Institute funded by the GENOCIDAL WOMANING Melinda Gates is complaining about a 'male college crisis' because of men's underrepresentation in college?

Wait, wait, let me guess. They want more men in college so they can impose the mandate for the vaccine created by womens to kill men! Ingenious.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Women need successful men to fulfill their purpose as Hirudo medicinalis.

LOL! It takes nerve to argue simultaneously "WOMEN ARE ROOTING FOR MALE SUCCESS!" AND "WOMEN WANT TO KILL US" and "WOMEN SABOTAGE BOYS' EDUCATION".

You are literally insane.

Colleges control who they admit, they're gaining credibility from shouting into a void

So first you claim that The Federalist is bad because it mentioned Brookings, even though Brookings is defending boys. How can you even live with such insanity and cognitive disosnance?

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 8wn6p (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy