This is intentional, you are no longer allowed to prevent crime instead watch it happen, contact bureaucratic police, and never see the property again.
I saw this happening after the drunk driver in Atlanta was shot after violently resisting arrest, taking a taser from an officer, and firing it at him. The left’s reply was why didn’t the police just let him run….
The majority of anti-police advocates are simply communists who object to the idea of private property. They don’t think you should even own a home, a car, or a tv, so of course they value the well-being of the intruder, the carjacker, and the thief above your mere “property”.
Meanwhile, I look at the exact same crimes and see:
perpetrators who have willfully forfeited their protections as a consequence of violating rational laws
personal belongings that represent the valuable efforts and irreplaceable time of their owner
If you steal, your life should be forfeit. Maybe we'd have less crime if these assholes knew that there would be no consequences if their victims simply killed them.
Horses are significantly more valuable being a work animals so that makes sense since historic damages from loss of a horse would be severe to potentially lethal for some. While bikes can be important for couriers a rider can only carry so much before starting to impede their own ability to travel. Meanwhile with the right kind of horse could pull a cart with magnitudes more weight in goods, sometimes things which were the sole livelihood of a farmer, across ground that bikes can't really travel well.
My favorite videos are from a year or two ago with a black chick screaming that while vandalizing some business. If these people don't fear consequences, then they won't be dissuaded from their crime. It's clear the police are not a deterent, maybe declaring open season on them would be.
A working justice system evolves to mitigate the death and horror that happens without it through revenge. You can't kill people over simple offenses: it's disproportionate in the same way revenge is.
We don't have a working justice system. This guy saw a crime, used the appropriate level of force to detain the criminals until the cops arrived, and then a bystander compelled him to release the criminals before the cops got there and now he's the one facing charges.
The only reason the bikes went back to their owner was because the criminal's mom turned them in.
The social contract works both ways. You cede the freedom to make your own justice to the state in return for the state's promise to handle it. The state isn't keeping up it's end of the bargain.
And let's not even get into the fact that the cops have carte blanche to blow you away if you don't do exactly what they say (or sometimes when you do!) no matter what crime, if any, prompted their interaction with you. Don't preach to me about proportionality.
I agree that things are dire and that society is faltering, but outright destroying what we have left and embracing murder isn't going to fix things. On the contrary, it would accelerate the destruction.
Eh, I'm currently reading some history texts about the early 1800's England. Napoleonic War type stuff. You stole back then and you hung.
I wouldn't say life back then was awesome, but that's probably largely due to the technological limitations of the time. Lots of poor and no mechanism to feed and employ them. It certainly wasn't a Mad Max dystopia or anything.
This is intentional, you are no longer allowed to prevent crime instead watch it happen, contact bureaucratic police, and never see the property again.
I never thought I’d see a day when these things woukd happen yet here we are
I saw this happening after the drunk driver in Atlanta was shot after violently resisting arrest, taking a taser from an officer, and firing it at him. The left’s reply was why didn’t the police just let him run….
The majority of anti-police advocates are simply communists who object to the idea of private property. They don’t think you should even own a home, a car, or a tv, so of course they value the well-being of the intruder, the carjacker, and the thief above your mere “property”.
Meanwhile, I look at the exact same crimes and see:
These worldviews are mutually exclusive.
This! We're not talking about Jean Valjean here.
Or Jacob Blake! How many times did they tell him to stop. I’m so sick of this
If you steal, your life should be forfeit. Maybe we'd have less crime if these assholes knew that there would be no consequences if their victims simply killed them.
We used to hang people for stealing a horse. Anything less than that was a whipping.
Horses are significantly more valuable being a work animals so that makes sense since historic damages from loss of a horse would be severe to potentially lethal for some. While bikes can be important for couriers a rider can only carry so much before starting to impede their own ability to travel. Meanwhile with the right kind of horse could pull a cart with magnitudes more weight in goods, sometimes things which were the sole livelihood of a farmer, across ground that bikes can't really travel well.
You forgot the /s.
My favorite videos are from a year or two ago with a black chick screaming that while vandalizing some business. If these people don't fear consequences, then they won't be dissuaded from their crime. It's clear the police are not a deterent, maybe declaring open season on them would be.
A working justice system evolves to mitigate the death and horror that happens without it through revenge. You can't kill people over simple offenses: it's disproportionate in the same way revenge is.
We don't have a working justice system. This guy saw a crime, used the appropriate level of force to detain the criminals until the cops arrived, and then a bystander compelled him to release the criminals before the cops got there and now he's the one facing charges.
The only reason the bikes went back to their owner was because the criminal's mom turned them in.
The social contract works both ways. You cede the freedom to make your own justice to the state in return for the state's promise to handle it. The state isn't keeping up it's end of the bargain.
And let's not even get into the fact that the cops have carte blanche to blow you away if you don't do exactly what they say (or sometimes when you do!) no matter what crime, if any, prompted their interaction with you. Don't preach to me about proportionality.
I agree that things are dire and that society is faltering, but outright destroying what we have left and embracing murder isn't going to fix things. On the contrary, it would accelerate the destruction.
Eh, I'm currently reading some history texts about the early 1800's England. Napoleonic War type stuff. You stole back then and you hung.
I wouldn't say life back then was awesome, but that's probably largely due to the technological limitations of the time. Lots of poor and no mechanism to feed and employ them. It certainly wasn't a Mad Max dystopia or anything.
Those were more pious times, and they had a justice system. What you were talking about before was murderous vigilantism. It's not the same.
my cat's used litter is worth more than any thief breaking into my home.
Property and safety are far more valuable than the lives and wellbeing of willful criminals.
[Whites] are more important than things.
Niggers steal bikes, news at 11
But now they punish the white guy trying to stop it.