If Ukraine has a future, it won't be a good one.
(twitter.com)
Comments (29)
sorted by:
"So, now, when you break Twitter T&Cs, your entire life savings disappears and you starve to death in a corner! Isn't progress great?"
comment removed by Ukrainian AI courts
This is like when the US State Department was talking about Pride month and equality for women in Afghanistan while the Taliban was taking over cities.
You know it's bad when people under the control of the Taliban may have more freedom in the future than you...
But it's okay, they defeated Putin!
I wonder how long it is before the EU demands Ukraine switches to the Euro.
Probably right before the Euro collapses along with the EU.
Call it a hunch, but feels like this castle built on sand is already halfway sunk, the looming winter crisis might just hit the gas pedal.
It all depends on Italy.
Can their government cut the deficit and can their banks survive what's coming.
UniCredit is regarded as a "systematically important bank" to the EU's continued existence. If it fails, it takes the entire Italian banking system with it and confidence in the banks to zero.
The first failure of a "systematically important bank" will kill the entire European Union.
If this is russian-made propaganda to make me hate the ukraine even more, it's working. Fucking nuke the place, you'd be doing the people a favour if this is their future.
How long before the genocide of ethnic ukrainians? That was the time everyone really started to care when this shit happened in Kosovo.
u/SupremeReader
You've showed it me at the time
Imagine the world without bureaucracy, stomping on the paper work, forever.
If we only could achieve the Bureaupunk utopia of Terry Gilliam's Brazil somehow.
The future of Ukraine is straight out of one of the worst theories about the Great Reset.
They are not fighting for their freedom. They are fighting over who will be their master.
Which one, "they're going to take away our sacred beaurocracy only from our dead cold hands"?
I once worked in a Polish tax office as an archivist, it wasn't a bad job (poorly paid but not hard) but all this stupidly needless paperwork was just beyond ridiculous. All you should really need is just (very safe) computer systems doing things automatically.
Did you watch the video? AI courts is an absolutely crazy idea, ripe for abuse.
I'm for Ukraine winning this but you can't be so biased as not to see how having AI controlled courts and no cache going to be very easily abused against the people. I can guarantee this will also have a fast track immigration policy and government quotas at the very least.
That will be a Canada on steroids while Ukraine will be cheering it on still happy from their victory.
I did say this before, Ukraine is making a deal with the devil here.
On the upside, leftists are great at destabilization but horrible at implementing working systems. They also have to work against Ukrainian corruption getting in the way. So with a bit of luck they will win and the great reset will fail miserably.
Remains to be seen.
The video makes a vague reference to "e-residency", which I assume means digital visas go brrr.
This new Ukraine will be all of the worst neoliberal ideas taken to their logical conclusion.
Anyway, enjoy the Last Crusade: https://twitter.com/GirkinGirkin/status/1569345325562822659
That was a nice touch.
It surely gonna mean an AI legal assistance rather than a Futurama robot jury.
You'll always need cash a spare change for bums and like.
soviet in all but name.
The video says they'd fire almost all their government bureaucracy.
This is bad why, exactly? No more deep state.
[of course this is just 1 politician posting this, it's not official]
The deep state would be automated, not eliminated. Tyranny and injustice would be automated, not eliminated. This is what gay space automated luxury communism is. Taking the unthinking and unfeeling bureaucrats of the managerial state and replacing them with even more unthinking and even more unfeeling un-human objects is absolutely not an improvement in anyway.
Computers are not biased, are predictable, and can be worked around.
If judges were changed to computers, I can tell you that this would be the superior result for about 75% of the judges I deal with now, who are alternatively openly biased politicians in robes and/or just stupid.
If they do you can challenge that as Unconstitutional and the Conservative Supreme Court will strike down that programming
Dude, the status quo is that women/minority activist DEMOCRATS are making the decisions. No computer can be as bad as they are.
What do you think is better?
Pretend society has 10,000 resources and 1000 people. Do you think a society where 1 man has 9001 resources and the remaining 999 people have 1 resource is better than the society where 100 people have 10 resources each, 1 man has 8,101 and the remaining 899 have 1 resource each?
That's all reducing the bureaucracy will lead to is further centralization of resources to the top with less resources shared for the bottom. The gains won't go to you. Also, less people means less representation. Whereas before you may have had a voice, now you'll have none. The system becomes easier to control by those in power and the system isn't working for you.