The deep state would be automated, not eliminated. Tyranny and injustice would be automated, not eliminated. This is what gay space automated luxury communism is. Taking the unthinking and unfeeling bureaucrats of the managerial state and replacing them with even more unthinking and even more unfeeling un-human objects is absolutely not an improvement in anyway.
Computers are not biased, are predictable, and can be worked around.
If judges were changed to computers, I can tell you that this would be the superior result for about 75% of the judges I deal with now, who are alternatively openly biased politicians in robes and/or just stupid.
Pretend society has 10,000 resources and 1000 people. Do you think a society where 1 man has 9001 resources and the remaining 999 people have 1 resource is better than the society where 100 people have 10 resources each, 1 man has 8,101 and the remaining 899 have 1 resource each?
That's all reducing the bureaucracy will lead to is further centralization of resources to the top with less resources shared for the bottom. The gains won't go to you. Also, less people means less representation. Whereas before you may have had a voice, now you'll have none. The system becomes easier to control by those in power and the system isn't working for you.
The video says they'd fire almost all their government bureaucracy.
This is bad why, exactly? No more deep state.
[of course this is just 1 politician posting this, it's not official]
The deep state would be automated, not eliminated. Tyranny and injustice would be automated, not eliminated. This is what gay space automated luxury communism is. Taking the unthinking and unfeeling bureaucrats of the managerial state and replacing them with even more unthinking and even more unfeeling un-human objects is absolutely not an improvement in anyway.
Computers are not biased, are predictable, and can be worked around.
If judges were changed to computers, I can tell you that this would be the superior result for about 75% of the judges I deal with now, who are alternatively openly biased politicians in robes and/or just stupid.
If they do you can challenge that as Unconstitutional and the Conservative Supreme Court will strike down that programming
Dude, the status quo is that women/minority activist DEMOCRATS are making the decisions. No computer can be as bad as they are.
What do you think is better?
Pretend society has 10,000 resources and 1000 people. Do you think a society where 1 man has 9001 resources and the remaining 999 people have 1 resource is better than the society where 100 people have 10 resources each, 1 man has 8,101 and the remaining 899 have 1 resource each?
That's all reducing the bureaucracy will lead to is further centralization of resources to the top with less resources shared for the bottom. The gains won't go to you. Also, less people means less representation. Whereas before you may have had a voice, now you'll have none. The system becomes easier to control by those in power and the system isn't working for you.