Pretend society has 10,000 resources and 1000 people. Do you think a society where 1 man has 9001 resources and the remaining 999 people have 1 resource is better than the society where 100 people have 10 resources each, 1 man has 8,101 and the remaining 899 have 1 resource each?
That's all reducing the bureaucracy will lead to is further centralization of resources to the top with less resources shared for the bottom. The gains won't go to you. Also, less people means less representation. Whereas before you may have had a voice, now you'll have none. The system becomes easier to control by those in power and the system isn't working for you.
What do you think is better?
Pretend society has 10,000 resources and 1000 people. Do you think a society where 1 man has 9001 resources and the remaining 999 people have 1 resource is better than the society where 100 people have 10 resources each, 1 man has 8,101 and the remaining 899 have 1 resource each?
That's all reducing the bureaucracy will lead to is further centralization of resources to the top with less resources shared for the bottom. The gains won't go to you. Also, less people means less representation. Whereas before you may have had a voice, now you'll have none. The system becomes easier to control by those in power and the system isn't working for you.