Everything about this whole Andrew Tate event feels off.
There are many clips of him saying based things so I was curious and then proceeded to look into his background. Very strange stuff there. The guy has one of the most unique backgrounds I ever seen.
Andrew Tate's father was a black chess genius who was a glowie.
Andrew somehow still grows up poor and then becomes a world class kickboxing champion. He and his brother then start a casino business in Romania along with managing a e-girl webcam business and then they start a self help seminar called Hustler's university which looks to be a multi level marketing scam.
Tate and his brother have also been accused of human trafficking in Romania.
Don't know what to make of this guy.
He says based shit then gets banned. Then he starts showing up everywhere.
Why is he suddenly everywhere? It cannot be just the Streisand effect?
Something feels astroturfed about this.
The way his content is spreading reminds me of how quickly the mainstream narratives of COVID, BLM and the recent Russian invasion became pervasive.
One of the ways to make money on Hustler's uni is to go to the affiliate campus, where you make clips of tate and promote his content on social media, spam his stuff as memes, etc. and put your affiliate link below
I think what happened was that the sheer amount of content he hit with that perfectly hit the algorithms and he was suddenly everywhere.
I never heard of him until today, until I saw him mentioned on the front page of All in Reddit.
It is absolutely planned propaganda if it comes from there.
A guy with a background like this, just suddenly showing up on radar, right around midterms when it can be pushed in people's faces.
I don't buy it.
Most because it keeps happening, quite frankly. They'll find someone, anyone, who they can pin on someone else and try and drag them down with another anchor. And if they can't find someone, they'll invent them.
It was not sudden. This dude has been around for years. He is just a dumbass that most people ignore. Now that he has been banned he is getting more attention
Yes. They're just reacting to the same bullshit twitter mobbing as usual. People on the right are just being retarded and boosting the moron because alot of morons have decided that defending a person's right to speech also means you have to defend what the content of the speech as worth promoting.
If it wasn't clear, I agree with you, it just reminded me of when they tried to blame the deepstate coup attempts across the Muslim world on that random video, just finding someone to pin it on that wasn't part of the Obama administration.
No, I get it. I wasn't trying to be sarcastic. I literally only know of this guy's existence because some women don't like that he said things. I didn't look into it because I didn't care what they like or don't like. It just seemed odd that it's the first thing they'll run to as a defense mechanism, instead of, you know, real issues.
Nah, focus on the mean words. That's the important thing.
I came to the same conclusion when Obama was having a massive, maskless party in his mansion with 'a sophisticated crowd' whilst the plebs were getting fired from their jobs and thrown out of grocery stores for not wearing masks.
The message was pretty clear 'The rules don't apply to us because we're better than you.'
I came to the same conclusion when Obama was having a massive, maskless party in his mansion with 'a sophisticated crowd' whilst the plebs were getting fired from their jobs and thrown out of grocery stores for not wearing masks.
Even more than that, the "help" at the party were all masked up while the partygoers were maskless.
Pretty much, it's why I argue all political parties should be banned and that you can only hold office not just by being voted in but also have a second job because a lot of ones we have the most trouble with are born into this entitled, never care for money class.
I'd trust a politician that only comes into office 2 days a week if the rest of the time he's a carpenter or even working the drive through at Wendy's.
Actually, that's one idea the Soviets did have right (on paper, at least). Gorbachov was actually a farmer by trade (though I doubt he did much farming while actually in government).
Alberta kind of does that to its mayors, by underpaying them severely - they kind of have to keep their regular jobs (yep, usually either farming or lawyering), because outside of the biggest cities, their salaries are a joke. (seriously, they don't make much more than your average experienced burger-flipper. And I might be overestimating here.)
In Texas, the part time legislature means that the elected officials have to have day jobs. Anecdotally, it seems to me that the vast majority are small business owners.
Ok, what people aren't seeing is that while The Masses might see money as an end in and of itself, it isn't. It's just a means to an end. Money is just a token, not just for tradeable goods, and services, but also power. The power to command those goods and services, and the power to get people to do what you want. I guess they need a new way to tokenize power, now that money is in everyone's hands (whereas that wasn't true just a few hundred years ago.)
I'd say it's not megalomania, but conformity and the desire to not screw up. People in positions of authority, in control of others, exercise that authority within existing bureaucracies, with their well-established rules and customs. A President, for example, is told by various agencies of federal government what the score is and what they expect of him and he complies or he doesn't. Same with every position within every bureaucracy, governmental or private.
The exercise of bureaucratic power requires conforming--doing what is either expected of you or what you think (rightly or wrongly) about what is expected of you when in that position. This is what motivates otherwise good people to do evil--because you will get some sort of positive reward when you do it, having fulfilled the mission/task, advanced the interest of whatever bureaucratic authority you serve. The more removed from the results of bureaucratic action you are, the less your conscience is wounded by the results of that action. You are compartmentalized. Much like a high-altitude bomber pilot. You know you're dropping bombs but you can't see people being blown to bits.
The leaders or creators of institutional bureaucracies, those that begin on top or work their way there, are very likely those sociopaths that get off on flexing.
It's definitely about power, but it's more than just power tripping. I'm not saying they aren't enjoying watching people suffer, but you should listen to these people when they talk.
They are using their power, to craft the world into what they want it to be. This is why the symbol of the Fabian Socialists is a hammer literally forging a world. It's one of the reasons why the symbols of the German Environmentalist movements is two hands clasping the world.
These are people who think they have the right to order the world in their image. Hurting you gives them a bit of pleasure from the sadism, but it's their desire to groom the world that makes them do what they do.
Everything about this whole Andrew Tate event feels off.
There are many clips of him saying based things so I was curious and then proceeded to look into his background. Very strange stuff there. The guy has one of the most unique backgrounds I ever seen.
Andrew Tate's father was a black chess genius who was a glowie.
Andrew somehow still grows up poor and then becomes a world class kickboxing champion. He and his brother then start a casino business in Romania along with managing a e-girl webcam business and then they start a self help seminar called Hustler's university which looks to be a multi level marketing scam.
Tate and his brother have also been accused of human trafficking in Romania.
Don't know what to make of this guy.
He says based shit then gets banned. Then he starts showing up everywhere.
Why is he suddenly everywhere? It cannot be just the Streisand effect?
Something feels astroturfed about this.
The way his content is spreading reminds me of how quickly the mainstream narratives of COVID, BLM and the recent Russian invasion became pervasive.
One of the ways to make money on Hustler's uni is to go to the affiliate campus, where you make clips of tate and promote his content on social media, spam his stuff as memes, etc. and put your affiliate link below
I think what happened was that the sheer amount of content he hit with that perfectly hit the algorithms and he was suddenly everywhere.
Like father, like son.
I never heard of him until today, until I saw him mentioned on the front page of All in Reddit. It is absolutely planned propaganda if it comes from there.
He's a member of the mob, and his official money makers are laundering schemes.
A guy with a background like this, just suddenly showing up on radar, right around midterms when it can be pushed in people's faces. I don't buy it.
Most because it keeps happening, quite frankly. They'll find someone, anyone, who they can pin on someone else and try and drag them down with another anchor. And if they can't find someone, they'll invent them.
It was not sudden. This dude has been around for years. He is just a dumbass that most people ignore. Now that he has been banned he is getting more attention
And yet he wasn't worth banning and a higher level of media attention until now.
Yes. They're just reacting to the same bullshit twitter mobbing as usual. People on the right are just being retarded and boosting the moron because alot of morons have decided that defending a person's right to speech also means you have to defend what the content of the speech as worth promoting.
I had no idea who this person was, and had not heard of him at all, until just now when I heard he got banned from some social media sites.
Well I mostly saw him being mocked before now. He was popular to post in cringe subs.
"All these people in North Africa are rioting because this guy in Florida burned a Quran in front of 50 people!"
They should have led with that then, and not that he said things that women didn't like.
But then again, they'd have to admit that other people exist, and that's just too hard.
If it wasn't clear, I agree with you, it just reminded me of when they tried to blame the deepstate coup attempts across the Muslim world on that random video, just finding someone to pin it on that wasn't part of the Obama administration.
No, I get it. I wasn't trying to be sarcastic. I literally only know of this guy's existence because some women don't like that he said things. I didn't look into it because I didn't care what they like or don't like. It just seemed odd that it's the first thing they'll run to as a defense mechanism, instead of, you know, real issues.
Nah, focus on the mean words. That's the important thing.
I came to the same conclusion when Obama was having a massive, maskless party in his mansion with 'a sophisticated crowd' whilst the plebs were getting fired from their jobs and thrown out of grocery stores for not wearing masks.
The message was pretty clear 'The rules don't apply to us because we're better than you.'
Even more than that, the "help" at the party were all masked up while the partygoers were maskless.
Thanks for reminding me that it was even worse than I remember.
Well sure, they weren't smart or sophisticated enough to not get covid, so they needed the extra protection masks provide.
Pretty much, it's why I argue all political parties should be banned and that you can only hold office not just by being voted in but also have a second job because a lot of ones we have the most trouble with are born into this entitled, never care for money class.
I'd trust a politician that only comes into office 2 days a week if the rest of the time he's a carpenter or even working the drive through at Wendy's.
Actually, that's one idea the Soviets did have right (on paper, at least). Gorbachov was actually a farmer by trade (though I doubt he did much farming while actually in government).
Alberta kind of does that to its mayors, by underpaying them severely - they kind of have to keep their regular jobs (yep, usually either farming or lawyering), because outside of the biggest cities, their salaries are a joke. (seriously, they don't make much more than your average experienced burger-flipper. And I might be overestimating here.)
In Texas, the part time legislature means that the elected officials have to have day jobs. Anecdotally, it seems to me that the vast majority are small business owners.
Ok, what people aren't seeing is that while The Masses might see money as an end in and of itself, it isn't. It's just a means to an end. Money is just a token, not just for tradeable goods, and services, but also power. The power to command those goods and services, and the power to get people to do what you want. I guess they need a new way to tokenize power, now that money is in everyone's hands (whereas that wasn't true just a few hundred years ago.)
Ok but what part of what he said was inaccurate?
Tate is a retard
Yeah in the same way Imp is
i think he's like mandela effect and never existed i. the past
"What else could it possibly be?"
I'd say it's not megalomania, but conformity and the desire to not screw up. People in positions of authority, in control of others, exercise that authority within existing bureaucracies, with their well-established rules and customs. A President, for example, is told by various agencies of federal government what the score is and what they expect of him and he complies or he doesn't. Same with every position within every bureaucracy, governmental or private.
The exercise of bureaucratic power requires conforming--doing what is either expected of you or what you think (rightly or wrongly) about what is expected of you when in that position. This is what motivates otherwise good people to do evil--because you will get some sort of positive reward when you do it, having fulfilled the mission/task, advanced the interest of whatever bureaucratic authority you serve. The more removed from the results of bureaucratic action you are, the less your conscience is wounded by the results of that action. You are compartmentalized. Much like a high-altitude bomber pilot. You know you're dropping bombs but you can't see people being blown to bits.
The leaders or creators of institutional bureaucracies, those that begin on top or work their way there, are very likely those sociopaths that get off on flexing.
Interesting how Andrew Tate's popularity took off right around the same time Kevin Samuels died. 🤔
It's definitely about power, but it's more than just power tripping. I'm not saying they aren't enjoying watching people suffer, but you should listen to these people when they talk.
They are using their power, to craft the world into what they want it to be. This is why the symbol of the Fabian Socialists is a hammer literally forging a world. It's one of the reasons why the symbols of the German Environmentalist movements is two hands clasping the world.
These are people who think they have the right to order the world in their image. Hurting you gives them a bit of pleasure from the sadism, but it's their desire to groom the world that makes them do what they do.
Well Andrew Tate is an American who is half white and black raised in the U.K. who has been living in Romania for a while.
I agree his accent is pretty strange.