“He disliked nearly all women and especially the young and pretty ones who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party the swallowers of slogans the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy.” -- Orwell, 1984.
It couldn't be the ideological adherence, which is more severe in women. It has to be the women, themselves, right?
It's not a problem if the ideology is a healthy one. The problem only exists when the native culture has no control over the ideology being taught to its girls.
You aren't wrong. That is part of the dark half of their nature.
Women are terrified of being in the out-group. They want the in-group's authority to protect them. That failing, they want to be on the in with the new authority, by any means necessary.
I don't fault them, really. Often the only way to survive an invasion was on your back and by being a bootlicker.
The job of men in society, conversely is to be the 'boots on the ground,' and strong enough to keep their women (safe? satisfied? 'on the plantation?')-- any way you cut it, this is a task most modern western men fail at.
My experience dovetails with your assertion here - but do you have a source about ideological adherence in women? I googled a bit but I might not be searching the right terms.
It's the type of social science that gets you defunded, so no.
I think I read about the ingroup fear in some pop-evolutionary psychology I caught in the manosphere. It's deeply politically incorrect to point any of this out, though, so hard studies and proper sources are rare as fuck.
First, he ain't picking them, he's at the point he actually asked during a press conference "Do I sign this? (Looks around for confirmation) I'll sign this ", he's a dementia ridden rubber stamp machine
Second we know why because some of the most volatile and cult like leftists have been trans and women.
The leftist men are all giant simps so loyalty is there till sex robots are affordable, gay men are having a divide between the ones that want to live their lives and those that will hump any butt near them so long as not female and trans you got a few but that number always decreases suddenly so they go with women to grow the cult within the judiciary.
Women are disproportionately democrat/liberal, and 100% of democrat nominees have to be certified for ideological purity. The Democrats are playing to WIN when it comes to taking over the Courts. Sadly, the Republicans are not, so the Democrats keep gaining advantage. It's fucking stupid.
Of Biden's judicial nominees, 75% have been women and over half have been women of color, Schumer said on the floor
So "color" is ~40% and so women are half of that, or 20%, yet they represent over 50% of nominees, why? Because they represent over 50% of the activist far left.
“He disliked nearly all women and especially the young and pretty ones who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party the swallowers of slogans the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy.” -- Orwell, 1984.
It couldn't be the ideological adherence, which is more severe in women. It has to be the women, themselves, right?
It's not a problem if the ideology is a healthy one. The problem only exists when the native culture has no control over the ideology being taught to its girls.
Women are born bootlickers.
You aren't wrong. That is part of the dark half of their nature.
Women are terrified of being in the out-group. They want the in-group's authority to protect them. That failing, they want to be on the in with the new authority, by any means necessary.
I don't fault them, really. Often the only way to survive an invasion was on your back and by being a bootlicker.
The job of men in society, conversely is to be the 'boots on the ground,' and strong enough to keep their women (safe? satisfied? 'on the plantation?')-- any way you cut it, this is a task most modern western men fail at.
My experience dovetails with your assertion here - but do you have a source about ideological adherence in women? I googled a bit but I might not be searching the right terms.
It's the type of social science that gets you defunded, so no.
I think I read about the ingroup fear in some pop-evolutionary psychology I caught in the manosphere. It's deeply politically incorrect to point any of this out, though, so hard studies and proper sources are rare as fuck.
Cheers!
Imagine actually believing that.
Tranny women or real ones?
First, he ain't picking them, he's at the point he actually asked during a press conference "Do I sign this? (Looks around for confirmation) I'll sign this ", he's a dementia ridden rubber stamp machine
Second we know why because some of the most volatile and cult like leftists have been trans and women.
The leftist men are all giant simps so loyalty is there till sex robots are affordable, gay men are having a divide between the ones that want to live their lives and those that will hump any butt near them so long as not female and trans you got a few but that number always decreases suddenly so they go with women to grow the cult within the judiciary.
Women are disproportionately democrat/liberal, and 100% of democrat nominees have to be certified for ideological purity. The Democrats are playing to WIN when it comes to taking over the Courts. Sadly, the Republicans are not, so the Democrats keep gaining advantage. It's fucking stupid.
So "color" is ~40% and so women are half of that, or 20%, yet they represent over 50% of nominees, why? Because they represent over 50% of the activist far left.
But how would he even know they were woman? Did he find time to become a biologist while he was abandoning our military and crashing our economy?
See, this is how you should post. Keep the crazy stuff out of the title, and make it a comment instead.
I lurk here wirhout logging in all the time and I have definitely noticed it.
Why is it creepy to give him good advice?