If one party is more likely to get what they want by going to court, they have an incentive to do so rather than attempt to compromise. Fixing that may not resolve the issue, but it is certainly a prerequisite to solving it.
How about beheading cheating spouses like the good old days? I'm pretty sure the threat of death might make a few of them rethink dragging out a divorce to keep the ex from getting the china set.
If you want to dissuade people from getting divorced:
No alimony unless physical abuse or infidelity can be proven, and even then it should only last a few years
Unless documented child abuse has happened, custody of children is 50/50 (unless one of the parents chooses to waive that) and 0 child support payments are made.
I especially still don't get that the mother more often than not is the one who gets full custody. It has been shown multiple times that not all women are fit to be mothers yet court always rules in favor of them, even to abusive women. 50/50 should be baseline.
It has been shown multiple times that not all women are fit to be mothers
The problem is that this runs headlong into conflict with feminist scripture - that all members of the "women" socio-religious movement are pure beings of light only corrupted by the touch of the devil man.
Every single institution you know is a fully-paid up member of this cult and, for them, it's easier for them to ruin your life than it is for them to check their assumptions.
eh, statistically they are the absolut worst. These stats may be skewed though because as a woman you have to be an absolute trainwreck and an obvious danger to your kids to lose custody. And even that isn't enough sometimes.
Right. Continue to make men pay for women's shitty choices and bad behaviour, and continue to avoid holding women responsible for either. That's the tradcuck way.
Make it illegal for women to initiate divorce. Instead if a wife wants out of a marriage she has to join a convent where she will spend the rest of her life. And after one year the husband may annul the marriage.
If one party is more likely to get what they want by going to court, they have an incentive to do so rather than attempt to compromise. Fixing that may not resolve the issue, but it is certainly a prerequisite to solving it.
How about beheading cheating spouses like the good old days? I'm pretty sure the threat of death might make a few of them rethink dragging out a divorce to keep the ex from getting the china set.
To be honest, it's more like Goering speaking about Kristallnacht.
"I don't care, but it could effect things that I do care about so maybe stop it".
I'll have you know, Hitler was an avowed anti-racist, DEI advocate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwYEKg1gNBc
Yeah, this is really tragic.
Maybe a bachelor tax would dissuade people from getting divorced.
This is the result of a bachelor tax
If you want to dissuade people from getting divorced:
I especially still don't get that the mother more often than not is the one who gets full custody. It has been shown multiple times that not all women are fit to be mothers yet court always rules in favor of them, even to abusive women. 50/50 should be baseline.
The problem is that this runs headlong into conflict with feminist scripture - that all members of the "women" socio-religious movement are pure beings of light only corrupted by the touch of
the devilman.Every single institution you know is a fully-paid up member of this cult and, for them, it's easier for them to ruin your life than it is for them to check their assumptions.
eh, statistically they are the absolut worst. These stats may be skewed though because as a woman you have to be an absolute trainwreck and an obvious danger to your kids to lose custody. And even that isn't enough sometimes.
Oh god.
That actually sounds even worse.
It's inverted simping...
Right. Continue to make men pay for women's shitty choices and bad behaviour, and continue to avoid holding women responsible for either. That's the tradcuck way.
Would that not simply make all men the property of the state?
Having to pay a tax for a state of existence is a bit much, no?
The state of ownership means that you cannot do anything without the permission of your owner. So basically, everyone already is.
It's more lenient than taxes have historically been. Many states have had a head tax, and this applied whether you weree married or not.
Make it illegal for women to initiate divorce. Instead if a wife wants out of a marriage she has to join a convent where she will spend the rest of her life. And after one year the husband may annul the marriage.
In a way, bachelor taxes are the closest society has gotten to correctly valuing women.
They have negative value to your life, so the tax provides a counterweight to that negative value to try and make the terrible decision less awful.
Good to see you agree that bachelor taxes are good and appropriate. Perhaps we can team up to petition Parliament to enact one?