The fact that you get mad about someone talking about birth rates actually proves that you are a woman and a feminist, because they too get mad at that.
It explains how he held the position that there are too few babies while supporting abortion.
No inconsistency there, that is also my position, dummy. I want more babies to married couples (and not adopted), not to teenage mothers or drug addicts.
Because he doesn't have to be internally consistent
Wait, you're concerned with internal consistency, after calling Kathy Barnette a feminist while supporting a candidate who supports castration and BLM (both of which you claim are feminist)?
Very clearly. Unless there's worse that we don't know yet.
Not really. They get mad because they have their strange Handmaid Tale delusions, while I get mad because they could actually enslave us by pumping up benefits for married couples and those with kids because of this ridiculous "crisis".
No, that's inconsistent. If you believe birth rates are too low, you should want more births regardless of origin.
President Trump supported Oz as well and he doesn't support those things. He understood that both other candidates were awful.
Very clearly. Unless there's worse that we don't know yet.
Always wrong, but never in doubt.
They get mad because they have their strange Handmaid Tale delusions
So you admit that they are also mad at people talking about birth rates, same as you. And that you're a woman trying to make different arguments against talking about birth rates to push your feminist agenda - just arguments that non-feminists might buy.
No, that's inconsistent. If you believe birth rates are too low, you should want more births regardless of origin.
Nope, I don't want births that lead to social pathology, and neither does Musk. He's right, and you're wrong... yet again.
President Trump supported Oz as well and he doesn't support those things. He understood that both other candidates were awful.
lol @ you thinking that Trump cares about any issue. You're a cultist. On the issues, Barnette was best, followed by McCormick (who supported judicial activism for homosexual marriage, but at least not castration like your candiate).
I'm not wrong. You can't prove me wrong, for a start.
You're not wrong, then demonstrate your claim. Don't demand that others disprove your wacked out nonsense.
Don't ever accuse me of being one of them.
I won't if you don't say the same stuff that they do. You accused K. Barnette of being a feminist based on zero evidence, while supporting a candidate who supports BLM and child castration, and that supposedly does not make you a feminist.
He wants whatever his handlers tell him to want.
Who are his handlers?
McCormick works for Ida Auken, or if you prefer to believe the figurehead is in power, Klaus Schwab.
The head of the WEF is not in charge, but some Danish whore politician who wrote something for them is, because women. Also, speaking at the WEF means that you 'work' for it, and speaking at that nefarious club is worse than supporting castrating children and BLM.
In a parallel universe, you are a beloved stand-up comedian.
No, it means you're, as usual, far too soft on women and not realizing that you're screwing yourself over.
You realize if birth rates ever get declared a "crisis" like he advocated for, the government will rip off every single man to provide for women to have kids.
That's why I'm against his shilling. It turns a losing position into a winning one for them. They don't deserve to be paid because their hostility was so obvious it managed to overrule biology.
No, it means you're, as usual, far too soft on women
At least I have the guts to admit that (some) women need to be slapped more often, while you have no solutions at all.
You realize if birth rates ever get declared a "crisis" like he advocated for, the government will rip off every single man to provide for women to have kids.
Like all of recorded history, before feminism? I thought you disliked feminism.
That's why I'm against his shilling. It turns a losing position into a winning one for them. They don't deserve to be paid because their hostility was so obvious it managed to overrule biology.
?? What are you even trying to say here?
Speaking of which, you're constantly panicking about how the womens are forcing men to pay for the kids that they created, while at the same time being against abortion - which if outlawed, would force many more men to pay for unwanted kids. Do tell me how that is consistent.
Having no solution is better than their solution, which is a final one.
Bachelor taxes have been tried twice in recorded history, in Ancient Rome it didn't go well, and in Nazi Germany, the stormcucks were defeated in war. 5% extra tax on the childless, researching that gives me another reason to hate ConPro.
Well, birth rates declining are a direct result of men realizing women don't offer enough to be worth it. Usually when you cause an issue, you get punished. Not women though, they can keep hating on men because people like Elon will shill for them to keep their stock listing overvalued.
Having no solution is better than their solution, which is a final one.
Oh right, totally forgot about that one. I do hope you get regular check-ups for your heart. Can't be healthy to have delusion that half the human population is planning to kill you.
Bachelor taxes have been tried twice in recorded history, in Ancient Rome
I hate those time-traveling feminists ruining ancient civilizations.
5% extra tax on the childless
Only 5%? Way too low as far as I am concerned. I'd say 25%.
Well, birth rates declining are a direct result of men realizing women don't offer enough to be worth it.
Kindly provide the evidence for this claim. That (1) this is happening (2) that it is happening at a sufficient scale to affect birthrates and that (3) this is the actual cause of declining birthrates. Or is this where you say that "numbers can't be trusted because corona so I'll make stuff up instead"?
Usually when you cause an issue, you get punished. Not women though
What issue did they cause, and in what way should they be 'punished'?
Not women though, they can keep hating on men because people like Elon will shill for them to keep their stock listing overvalued.
You do far more harm to yourself with your obsession than those weak pipsqueaks do with their supposed 'hatred'.
You joke, but the rise of women's status in Ancient Rome is actually a thing.
Why not just make it 100% and give it all to your female masters? Actually, why don't women's supporters volunteer to pay more taxes because they 100% deserve it...
The decline in birth rates was initially linked to the 2008 financial crisis, but it continued to fall even as economic recovery was occurring. It proves that it's a social cause, not an economic cause.
Reparations. I think it would be poetic to make the world's best race baiters have to pay up for everyone.
It's a good thing that you don't have a Twitter, so you can't make a total fool of yourself there as well by calling Kathy Barnette a 'feminist'.
Do tell me though. Why exactly would some woman not try to extract hundreds of thousands of dollars from Musk, just because he supports abortion for his employees?
Sorry, didn't know you had access to her bank statements, or that only plutocrats and celebrities are permitted to run (P.S. I sort of supported the dirtbag plutocrat).
She already got the money, 6 years ago. This came out because he is failing at his task of being the controlled "right-wing savior".
So what was your point exactly? Of course they are bringing this out to smear him, but how does this relate to his support for abortion?
I don't need to have access, the winner being one of Ida Auken's shills proves it.
What are you babbling about now? You can't even get right who is the 'winner', nor whom her candidacy helped. I suggest you get publicly available information first before you pretend to possess secret knowledge.
It relates because his continuous support for what they want is what kept it from being released.
And yet 'it was released' after he came out in favor of abortion, so how does this relate to the devilish More Feminine plot led by Kim Potter to kill you?
McCormick leads, with 416k votes to Oz with 415k. McCormick is a WEF member, who has spoken alongside Ida Auken, the woman who wrote the "vision of 2030".
Because he's lost his usefulness. Same as they put up allegations against the man who created "toxic masculinity" because it didn't stick.
How convenient it comes to light now. Much like Kavanaugh, anyone but the most die-hard Cathedral zealots should take a sniff and know this reeks.
And just like that, Impy starts listening and believing to unsubstantiated MeToo allegations.
And you know what the 'shilling for women' is? Commenting on the low birth rate.
But of course, Women-man bad, after all. Aka: No bad tactics, only targets.
Subjecting him to the tactics of his own allies is fair game.
Whether it's real or not doesn't change that it was how they were controlling him.
It explains how he shilled birth rates at the same time as the climate cult said people should still have babies.
It explains how he held the position that there are too few babies while supporting abortion.
Because he doesn't have to be internally consistent, he has to do what they say.
It is?
The fact that you get mad about someone talking about birth rates actually proves that you are a woman and a feminist, because they too get mad at that.
No inconsistency there, that is also my position, dummy. I want more babies to married couples (and not adopted), not to teenage mothers or drug addicts.
Wait, you're concerned with internal consistency, after calling Kathy Barnette a feminist while supporting a candidate who supports castration and BLM (both of which you claim are feminist)?
Very clearly. Unless there's worse that we don't know yet.
Not really. They get mad because they have their strange Handmaid Tale delusions, while I get mad because they could actually enslave us by pumping up benefits for married couples and those with kids because of this ridiculous "crisis".
No, that's inconsistent. If you believe birth rates are too low, you should want more births regardless of origin.
President Trump supported Oz as well and he doesn't support those things. He understood that both other candidates were awful.
Always wrong, but never in doubt.
So you admit that they are also mad at people talking about birth rates, same as you. And that you're a woman trying to make different arguments against talking about birth rates to push your feminist agenda - just arguments that non-feminists might buy.
Nope, I don't want births that lead to social pathology, and neither does Musk. He's right, and you're wrong... yet again.
lol @ you thinking that Trump cares about any issue. You're a cultist. On the issues, Barnette was best, followed by McCormick (who supported judicial activism for homosexual marriage, but at least not castration like your candiate).
I'm not wrong. You can't prove me wrong, for a start.
Don't ever accuse me of being one of them.
He wants whatever his handlers tell him to want.
McCormick works for Ida Auken, or if you prefer to believe the figurehead is in power, Klaus Schwab.
You're not wrong, then demonstrate your claim. Don't demand that others disprove your wacked out nonsense.
I won't if you don't say the same stuff that they do. You accused K. Barnette of being a feminist based on zero evidence, while supporting a candidate who supports BLM and child castration, and that supposedly does not make you a feminist.
Who are his handlers?
The head of the WEF is not in charge, but some Danish whore politician who wrote something for them is, because women. Also, speaking at the WEF means that you 'work' for it, and speaking at that nefarious club is worse than supporting castrating children and BLM.
In a parallel universe, you are a beloved stand-up comedian.
Speaking of which, I have the same positions as Musk. Does that mean that I am 'shilling for women'? And am I 'blackmailed' as well?
No, it means you're, as usual, far too soft on women and not realizing that you're screwing yourself over.
You realize if birth rates ever get declared a "crisis" like he advocated for, the government will rip off every single man to provide for women to have kids.
That's why I'm against his shilling. It turns a losing position into a winning one for them. They don't deserve to be paid because their hostility was so obvious it managed to overrule biology.
At least I have the guts to admit that (some) women need to be slapped more often, while you have no solutions at all.
Like all of recorded history, before feminism? I thought you disliked feminism.
?? What are you even trying to say here?
Speaking of which, you're constantly panicking about how the womens are forcing men to pay for the kids that they created, while at the same time being against abortion - which if outlawed, would force many more men to pay for unwanted kids. Do tell me how that is consistent.
Having no solution is better than their solution, which is a final one.
Bachelor taxes have been tried twice in recorded history, in Ancient Rome it didn't go well, and in Nazi Germany, the stormcucks were defeated in war. 5% extra tax on the childless, researching that gives me another reason to hate ConPro.
Well, birth rates declining are a direct result of men realizing women don't offer enough to be worth it. Usually when you cause an issue, you get punished. Not women though, they can keep hating on men because people like Elon will shill for them to keep their stock listing overvalued.
Oh right, totally forgot about that one. I do hope you get regular check-ups for your heart. Can't be healthy to have delusion that half the human population is planning to kill you.
I hate those time-traveling feminists ruining ancient civilizations.
Only 5%? Way too low as far as I am concerned. I'd say 25%.
Kindly provide the evidence for this claim. That (1) this is happening (2) that it is happening at a sufficient scale to affect birthrates and that (3) this is the actual cause of declining birthrates. Or is this where you say that "numbers can't be trusted because corona so I'll make stuff up instead"?
What issue did they cause, and in what way should they be 'punished'?
You do far more harm to yourself with your obsession than those weak pipsqueaks do with their supposed 'hatred'.
I haven't had the vax. No need for heart scans.
You joke, but the rise of women's status in Ancient Rome is actually a thing.
Why not just make it 100% and give it all to your female masters? Actually, why don't women's supporters volunteer to pay more taxes because they 100% deserve it...
The decline in birth rates was initially linked to the 2008 financial crisis, but it continued to fall even as economic recovery was occurring. It proves that it's a social cause, not an economic cause.
Reparations. I think it would be poetic to make the world's best race baiters have to pay up for everyone.
Ridiculous.
He probably could have just had her killed for less than 250k, what a gentleman!
Definitely for less than he spent catering to women's whims lately.
I'm just happy to be vindicated. I knew there was something off about Elon, his actions didn't make sense. Now we know why.
Nobody bought his "I'm a Republican and we need a moderate party (that would worship women)" act, so they cut him loose.
All male allies of the More Feminine Way will end up betrayed, just like they betrayed the rest of us by siding with them.
I wish I had a Twitter, just so I could send this.
It's a good thing that you don't have a Twitter, so you can't make a total fool of yourself there as well by calling Kathy Barnette a 'feminist'.
Do tell me though. Why exactly would some woman not try to extract hundreds of thousands of dollars from Musk, just because he supports abortion for his employees?
Maybe "paid off spoiler candidate" would have been more accurate.
She already got the money, 6 years ago. This came out because he is failing at his task of being the controlled "right-wing savior".
Sorry, didn't know you had access to her bank statements, or that only plutocrats and celebrities are permitted to run (P.S. I sort of supported the dirtbag plutocrat).
So what was your point exactly? Of course they are bringing this out to smear him, but how does this relate to his support for abortion?
I don't need to have access, the winner being one of Ida Auken's shills proves it.
It relates because his continuous support for what they want is what kept it from being released.
What are you babbling about now? You can't even get right who is the 'winner', nor whom her candidacy helped. I suggest you get publicly available information first before you pretend to possess secret knowledge.
And yet 'it was released' after he came out in favor of abortion, so how does this relate to the devilish More Feminine plot led by Kim Potter to kill you?
McCormick leads, with 416k votes to Oz with 415k. McCormick is a WEF member, who has spoken alongside Ida Auken, the woman who wrote the "vision of 2030".
Because he's lost his usefulness. Same as they put up allegations against the man who created "toxic masculinity" because it didn't stick.
So did she return the money given for her silence?
Thats not cynicism, thats law.
Apparently her friend had the same information and was not under the non disclosure agreement.
Of course not. She didn't say it, an "anonymous source" did.
Oh well that sounds illegal. Im sure they’ve been arrested by now /s
https://archive.ph/KFIzi