No, it means you're, as usual, far too soft on women and not realizing that you're screwing yourself over.
You realize if birth rates ever get declared a "crisis" like he advocated for, the government will rip off every single man to provide for women to have kids.
That's why I'm against his shilling. It turns a losing position into a winning one for them. They don't deserve to be paid because their hostility was so obvious it managed to overrule biology.
No, it means you're, as usual, far too soft on women
At least I have the guts to admit that (some) women need to be slapped more often, while you have no solutions at all.
You realize if birth rates ever get declared a "crisis" like he advocated for, the government will rip off every single man to provide for women to have kids.
Like all of recorded history, before feminism? I thought you disliked feminism.
That's why I'm against his shilling. It turns a losing position into a winning one for them. They don't deserve to be paid because their hostility was so obvious it managed to overrule biology.
?? What are you even trying to say here?
Speaking of which, you're constantly panicking about how the womens are forcing men to pay for the kids that they created, while at the same time being against abortion - which if outlawed, would force many more men to pay for unwanted kids. Do tell me how that is consistent.
Having no solution is better than their solution, which is a final one.
Bachelor taxes have been tried twice in recorded history, in Ancient Rome it didn't go well, and in Nazi Germany, the stormcucks were defeated in war. 5% extra tax on the childless, researching that gives me another reason to hate ConPro.
Well, birth rates declining are a direct result of men realizing women don't offer enough to be worth it. Usually when you cause an issue, you get punished. Not women though, they can keep hating on men because people like Elon will shill for them to keep their stock listing overvalued.
Having no solution is better than their solution, which is a final one.
Oh right, totally forgot about that one. I do hope you get regular check-ups for your heart. Can't be healthy to have delusion that half the human population is planning to kill you.
Bachelor taxes have been tried twice in recorded history, in Ancient Rome
I hate those time-traveling feminists ruining ancient civilizations.
5% extra tax on the childless
Only 5%? Way too low as far as I am concerned. I'd say 25%.
Well, birth rates declining are a direct result of men realizing women don't offer enough to be worth it.
Kindly provide the evidence for this claim. That (1) this is happening (2) that it is happening at a sufficient scale to affect birthrates and that (3) this is the actual cause of declining birthrates. Or is this where you say that "numbers can't be trusted because corona so I'll make stuff up instead"?
Usually when you cause an issue, you get punished. Not women though
What issue did they cause, and in what way should they be 'punished'?
Not women though, they can keep hating on men because people like Elon will shill for them to keep their stock listing overvalued.
You do far more harm to yourself with your obsession than those weak pipsqueaks do with their supposed 'hatred'.
Speaking of which, I have the same positions as Musk. Does that mean that I am 'shilling for women'? And am I 'blackmailed' as well?
No, it means you're, as usual, far too soft on women and not realizing that you're screwing yourself over.
You realize if birth rates ever get declared a "crisis" like he advocated for, the government will rip off every single man to provide for women to have kids.
That's why I'm against his shilling. It turns a losing position into a winning one for them. They don't deserve to be paid because their hostility was so obvious it managed to overrule biology.
At least I have the guts to admit that (some) women need to be slapped more often, while you have no solutions at all.
Like all of recorded history, before feminism? I thought you disliked feminism.
?? What are you even trying to say here?
Speaking of which, you're constantly panicking about how the womens are forcing men to pay for the kids that they created, while at the same time being against abortion - which if outlawed, would force many more men to pay for unwanted kids. Do tell me how that is consistent.
Having no solution is better than their solution, which is a final one.
Bachelor taxes have been tried twice in recorded history, in Ancient Rome it didn't go well, and in Nazi Germany, the stormcucks were defeated in war. 5% extra tax on the childless, researching that gives me another reason to hate ConPro.
Well, birth rates declining are a direct result of men realizing women don't offer enough to be worth it. Usually when you cause an issue, you get punished. Not women though, they can keep hating on men because people like Elon will shill for them to keep their stock listing overvalued.
Oh right, totally forgot about that one. I do hope you get regular check-ups for your heart. Can't be healthy to have delusion that half the human population is planning to kill you.
I hate those time-traveling feminists ruining ancient civilizations.
Only 5%? Way too low as far as I am concerned. I'd say 25%.
Kindly provide the evidence for this claim. That (1) this is happening (2) that it is happening at a sufficient scale to affect birthrates and that (3) this is the actual cause of declining birthrates. Or is this where you say that "numbers can't be trusted because corona so I'll make stuff up instead"?
What issue did they cause, and in what way should they be 'punished'?
You do far more harm to yourself with your obsession than those weak pipsqueaks do with their supposed 'hatred'.