The fact that you get mad about someone talking about birth rates actually proves that you are a woman and a feminist, because they too get mad at that.
It explains how he held the position that there are too few babies while supporting abortion.
No inconsistency there, that is also my position, dummy. I want more babies to married couples (and not adopted), not to teenage mothers or drug addicts.
Because he doesn't have to be internally consistent
Wait, you're concerned with internal consistency, after calling Kathy Barnette a feminist while supporting a candidate who supports castration and BLM (both of which you claim are feminist)?
Very clearly. Unless there's worse that we don't know yet.
Not really. They get mad because they have their strange Handmaid Tale delusions, while I get mad because they could actually enslave us by pumping up benefits for married couples and those with kids because of this ridiculous "crisis".
No, that's inconsistent. If you believe birth rates are too low, you should want more births regardless of origin.
President Trump supported Oz as well and he doesn't support those things. He understood that both other candidates were awful.
Very clearly. Unless there's worse that we don't know yet.
Always wrong, but never in doubt.
They get mad because they have their strange Handmaid Tale delusions
So you admit that they are also mad at people talking about birth rates, same as you. And that you're a woman trying to make different arguments against talking about birth rates to push your feminist agenda - just arguments that non-feminists might buy.
No, that's inconsistent. If you believe birth rates are too low, you should want more births regardless of origin.
Nope, I don't want births that lead to social pathology, and neither does Musk. He's right, and you're wrong... yet again.
President Trump supported Oz as well and he doesn't support those things. He understood that both other candidates were awful.
lol @ you thinking that Trump cares about any issue. You're a cultist. On the issues, Barnette was best, followed by McCormick (who supported judicial activism for homosexual marriage, but at least not castration like your candiate).
I'm not wrong. You can't prove me wrong, for a start.
You're not wrong, then demonstrate your claim. Don't demand that others disprove your wacked out nonsense.
Don't ever accuse me of being one of them.
I won't if you don't say the same stuff that they do. You accused K. Barnette of being a feminist based on zero evidence, while supporting a candidate who supports BLM and child castration, and that supposedly does not make you a feminist.
He wants whatever his handlers tell him to want.
Who are his handlers?
McCormick works for Ida Auken, or if you prefer to believe the figurehead is in power, Klaus Schwab.
The head of the WEF is not in charge, but some Danish whore politician who wrote something for them is, because women. Also, speaking at the WEF means that you 'work' for it, and speaking at that nefarious club is worse than supporting castrating children and BLM.
In a parallel universe, you are a beloved stand-up comedian.
It is?
The fact that you get mad about someone talking about birth rates actually proves that you are a woman and a feminist, because they too get mad at that.
No inconsistency there, that is also my position, dummy. I want more babies to married couples (and not adopted), not to teenage mothers or drug addicts.
Wait, you're concerned with internal consistency, after calling Kathy Barnette a feminist while supporting a candidate who supports castration and BLM (both of which you claim are feminist)?
Very clearly. Unless there's worse that we don't know yet.
Not really. They get mad because they have their strange Handmaid Tale delusions, while I get mad because they could actually enslave us by pumping up benefits for married couples and those with kids because of this ridiculous "crisis".
No, that's inconsistent. If you believe birth rates are too low, you should want more births regardless of origin.
President Trump supported Oz as well and he doesn't support those things. He understood that both other candidates were awful.
Always wrong, but never in doubt.
So you admit that they are also mad at people talking about birth rates, same as you. And that you're a woman trying to make different arguments against talking about birth rates to push your feminist agenda - just arguments that non-feminists might buy.
Nope, I don't want births that lead to social pathology, and neither does Musk. He's right, and you're wrong... yet again.
lol @ you thinking that Trump cares about any issue. You're a cultist. On the issues, Barnette was best, followed by McCormick (who supported judicial activism for homosexual marriage, but at least not castration like your candiate).
I'm not wrong. You can't prove me wrong, for a start.
Don't ever accuse me of being one of them.
He wants whatever his handlers tell him to want.
McCormick works for Ida Auken, or if you prefer to believe the figurehead is in power, Klaus Schwab.
You're not wrong, then demonstrate your claim. Don't demand that others disprove your wacked out nonsense.
I won't if you don't say the same stuff that they do. You accused K. Barnette of being a feminist based on zero evidence, while supporting a candidate who supports BLM and child castration, and that supposedly does not make you a feminist.
Who are his handlers?
The head of the WEF is not in charge, but some Danish whore politician who wrote something for them is, because women. Also, speaking at the WEF means that you 'work' for it, and speaking at that nefarious club is worse than supporting castrating children and BLM.
In a parallel universe, you are a beloved stand-up comedian.