I don't want "Getting ride", Mr. Bones
(twitter.com)
Comments (23)
sorted by:
Why not remove the concept entirely and anyone who says men or women is bigoted. We would also have to remove terms like gay, lesbian and trans since they have no meaning once we remove sex.
Yes, that's the ultimate goal of gender equality.
You know, maybe we do need a third bathroom. One for men, one for women, and one for these goddamned freaks. And if anyone gets attacked in one of those bathrooms, the attack is to be legally IGNORED. Use at your OWN RISK bathrooms.
Because why should I want to share a bathroom with a lesbian that considers itself a male, anyway?
There's an unexplained rise in assault, rape and murder of disabled people (and then: here's why that's a good thing)
A hipster bar in my city actually did this in mid 2000s. The restroom was supposed to be 'gender alternative' (their terminology wasn't quite there yet) but it simply ended up being a second male restroom, since men would use it instead of waiting in line when the place was packed. And of course, since it was used by men, the seat was all piss and women wouldn't use it.
Wait is it really universal for a "third gender" bathroom to always turn into a "women shat in the sinks and men pissed on the seats" shithole?
... and how long before that turns into "It can't have been child rape, Your Honour. I don't recognise the concept of 'child'!"
We've already seen "It can't have been rape, because the defendant didn't recognize the concept of consent." fly in a European courtroom, so it's arguably already happened.
SEXUAL
EMERGENCY
Rapey.
It would be rapey.
You heard him women. Time to use the change rooms with the men.
Ignore any ogling you get, this is for equality after all!
Women will never allow this. Too much privilege to give up.
"Woohoo it sounds liberating and progressive, so let's do it!" That's quality policy making right there.
considered and rejected.
Naive. All female privilege would remain in place under this system. It would just become illegal to talk about.
No laws mandate for less severe sentencing for women but it happens anyway. No laws say men should be less favoured in family courts but it happens anyway. Laws don't differentiate men and women, nor create simps, it's just a by-product of the very existence of men and women, which you can't legislate away.
Eradicating the legal concept of a man or a woman would not put men on an even footing, it would just make the hidden legal prejudice against men even harder to grasp. Do you really think they'd start playing fair because the law tells courts they have to be blind to sex? It would only elevate androgynous-looking people and incentivise more tranny madness.
Edit: as to your question, 'What are they going to sue you for?' you'd get sued for failing to treat women sex-agnostically under the law. The rules would suddenly be put in place again when used against you. They'd only be absent when you need them.