Spain arrests YouTube star with 3 million subs for criticizing the Ukrainian government
(national-conservative.com)
Comments (65)
sorted by:
lol, how's that "liberal democracy" thing going
Free speech until you say something that might matter.
Yeah, as with that other thing we're not allowed to criticize.
You mean rule 16?
Noooooo you can't say bad words about (((our))) hero!!!
Why "((()))"?
The USA is run by a lot of Jewish people with Jewish interests. George Soros funds a lot of interests in Europe and NA. Soros speaks about how he pushes his values specifically because he's Jewish. Zalenskyy is Jewish. Russian oligarchs are Jewish and complain they're fighting National Socialists. The Jewish influence is written all over the Ukrainian war. ((())) Represents Jew without saying Jew.
The identity of the puppet doesn't really mean much though, be honest.
Von Der Leyen has her hand so deep in Zelensky's ass, she's giving him a colonoscopy.
Weird how some guys are into being fisted by women.
Wait until you see the picture of Klaus Schwab in a chastity cage.
But there is nothing supporting these views.
Oy vey, there is no evidence to support everything widely available with a simple internet search from valid left-wing mainstream approved sources.
I mean, there has been centuries those myths were spread, and nothing, not even one droplet of truth to even prove one single thing has ever come out.
Roe v Wage came out, imagine something this big, and not even one morsel of truth to prove it.
How have there been centuries of rumors about what George Soros is up to and what nationality Russian oligarchs are or Zalenskyy? And USA's Jewish influence was really only evident in the last century so likely not centuries of evidence. I don't really see many Americans bring it up until late 1800s and early 1900s at the earliest.
About the "Jewish influence". Not a single shred of evidence. George Soros sure, but he does that despite his faith or ethnicity. Since many non-Jews(overwhelming) does it too.
dalse
Nah, all you have to do is link that screen capture of him with the Israeli flag in the background.
I have no idea what you're talking about, who would do something as terrible as that?
How many times have you fapped to that image?
You are a jew and a faggot.
Who let Justin Trudeau in here?
I am not into men, that's you. So, stop projecting, and lastly, what is wrong in being Jewish?
Because he has vagina envy.
Very good point!
Spain is explicitly a feminist hellhole. They wore masks outside for months. They still may be wearing them outside. They wore masks in the ocean for goodness sake.
Imagine needing political asylum and thinking you might actually have protection in the EU of all places.
It is amusing that they dropped all protection on the secret police complaint of a non-EU nation, though.
Agree, he should have gone to Russia, as long as he keeps parroting the official account from the Kremlin he will be safe.
If he would do that, he might as well have stayed in Ukraine and parrot their version.
He could do what that lancaster dude is doing. Fake news all around and in Ukraine.
fuck ukraine
Point people that are dismissing concerns about Biden's Ministry of Truth to stories like this.
You just know the crazy eyed nutter they put in charge of it is going to demand prosecutorial powers next.
https://www.rt.com/russia/555018-kiev-blogger-treason-spain-arrest/
Never heard of the site, so I looked for the story elsewhere. It appears to be true, but only covered by Russian media.
A Lublin Triangle country. How curious. Also, why did he have political asylum from Lithuania, in Spain?
January was before the war...what did Lithuania know and when did they know it?
Why were these two countries working together? (both led by feminists...)
Sounds like something Heinrich Himmler would say.
Yahoo is literally printing verbatim statements from the SBU as news. What the actual fuck.
https://archive.ph/8fEnI
We don't do shitty movie references here.
I live my life a quarter-downvote at a time.
“No freedom-o of speech-o.”
El "right-o"!!
We better don't say anymore that Ukraine sucks.
So, why did this guy (and I was aware of his existence ever since his anti-maidan days) end up in Spain, anyway.
You'd think he would be far better off in Russia... Oh, right.
The news seems quite suspicious. I will definitely need more to believe it. As imp said, only Russian websites covered it.
Because this feels very much akin to what Russians are going through in Russia, with questioning the Kremlin narrative(leads to 10/15 years of jail and/or fine). There is no actual law in Spain that covers criticizing Ukraine. And Spain hasn't done anything with the same level of fervor as the UK. If the news used UK, France l, Germany, Poland and the other Baltic countries it would have been slightly more believable. Lithuania can not unilaterally revoke any asylum given by the EU.
Sorry but this smells like fake news. Or at the very least misinformation.
I will change my mind on this subject accordingly if more reliable evidence comes up.
EDIT: some more digging I found this website that said he did get arrested but provided no other info in regards to Lithuania, or for criticizing Ukraine.
https://imi.org.ua/en/news/shariy-detained-in-spain-i45407
According to this website he is also out on bail https://imi.org.ua/en/news/spanish-court-releases-shariy-on-bail-media-i45420
The website doesn't seem to be pro-Russia either, as they are reporting crimes Russia did against journalists. https://imi.org.ua/en/monitorings/russia-s-media-crimes-in-war-against-ukraine-to-be-updated-i44108 and https://imi.org.ua/en/monitorings/russians-have-killed-six-journalists-since-beginning-of-invasion-imi-i44470
And so far, my opinion has changed to "misinformation" from "fake news"
That's not how extradition works. It doesn't need to be illegal in Spain. In fact that would make extradition more difficult because Spain would have jurisdiction.
The story is that he got arrested. Lithuania is irrelevant. In the article you linked Ukraine seems to admit this is why he was arrested. Your conclusion is unwarranted.
Now you could argue that the headline and OP are misleading by not mentioning he's a Ukrainian citizen, but it's in the first line of the story.
I am quoting the article initially. Especially the part of Lithuania, which felt really off. My conclusion at the end shows I changed my mind from full fabrication to misinformation. Is that not the right thing to do when you get new information about something? Is it not natural for one to change their opinion based on new information?