I agree, but that's a harder case to make and requires more data. It's simpler and more provable that it screws up your immune response to this specific (mostly harmless) virus.
These are of people that got tested, so missing data is how large that population is and how likely they are to get tested. Unvaccinated may be more likely to just take their zinc and witch's brew and see what happens.
Same thing with their previous graphs... was 100% BA.1 original Omicron, now 100% BA.2 Omicron but from other data on BA.2 it's 1/4th as many cases even though it's at scary 100%.
NY is 20% positive... of the people coming in for tests. Get rid of mandatory tests, test positivity rate goes up because only people sick with something get tested, but graph shows a troubling trend of positive tests increasing.
If you visit the site directly, you can toggle over to "proportion of tests" data. For the current April 12th to 18th timeframe on the site, the "not vaccinated" group actually makes up the largest percentage of total tests (26.8%), and also the lowest positivity rate (currently 9.6%).
Yes, and 77% population has 1+ dose so if the vaccine did nothing there should be 23% sick unvaccinated but there's only 10%.
What's really going on is that the vaccine only delays when you'll get sick and only helps reduce severity if you get sick in a brief window where it's not preventing illness but not completely worn off, and may be negative effective after that.
That's a good point. I got sick back in January I think it was when the Omicron scare was at it's height around here. I didn't bother getting a test. Exactly why would I waste my time? There's nothing to gain from a test but useless information. The treatment would be no different. If anything there's something to lose with all the case tracking.
If you observe Covidian circles though, they insist you must get a test if you have any sort of symptoms. They never can explain why, they just follow along because The Science told them to.
The only reason to get tested is so you can get monoclonal antibodies.
Everything else will play out the same as any other virus... take your zinc, D, honey, mouthwash gargle, quercitin, whatever and if you feel like dying go to the hospital.
The thing is that when people are asking you what special thing you did to not get infected, they get mad when you answer not getting jabbed. You can't win with some people.
Been saying this for awhile.
Injection harms proper immune response through original antigenic sin.
I think it isn't (or isn't just) that; it fucks the immune system up in general.
aids is effectively caused by an exhausted immune system that is to tired to and defeated to defend itself.
I agree, but that's a harder case to make and requires more data. It's simpler and more provable that it screws up your immune response to this specific (mostly harmless) virus.
These are of people that got tested, so missing data is how large that population is and how likely they are to get tested. Unvaccinated may be more likely to just take their zinc and witch's brew and see what happens.
Same thing with their previous graphs... was 100% BA.1 original Omicron, now 100% BA.2 Omicron but from other data on BA.2 it's 1/4th as many cases even though it's at scary 100%.
NY is 20% positive... of the people coming in for tests. Get rid of mandatory tests, test positivity rate goes up because only people sick with something get tested, but graph shows a troubling trend of positive tests increasing.
...they are pretty charts though.
If you visit the site directly, you can toggle over to "proportion of tests" data. For the current April 12th to 18th timeframe on the site, the "not vaccinated" group actually makes up the largest percentage of total tests (26.8%), and also the lowest positivity rate (currently 9.6%).
Ah I missed that button. That makes sense because unvaccinated still have mandatory tests in some places.
Yes, and 77% population has 1+ dose so if the vaccine did nothing there should be 23% sick unvaccinated but there's only 10%.
What's really going on is that the vaccine only delays when you'll get sick and only helps reduce severity if you get sick in a brief window where it's not preventing illness but not completely worn off, and may be negative effective after that.
That's a good point. I got sick back in January I think it was when the Omicron scare was at it's height around here. I didn't bother getting a test. Exactly why would I waste my time? There's nothing to gain from a test but useless information. The treatment would be no different. If anything there's something to lose with all the case tracking.
If you observe Covidian circles though, they insist you must get a test if you have any sort of symptoms. They never can explain why, they just follow along because The Science told them to.
The only reason to get tested is so you can get monoclonal antibodies.
Everything else will play out the same as any other virus... take your zinc, D, honey, mouthwash gargle, quercitin, whatever and if you feel like dying go to the hospital.
Where they will give you one last kick into the grave.
The thing is that when people are asking you what special thing you did to not get infected, they get mad when you answer not getting jabbed. You can't win with some people.
I still think it's bullshit because they don't have an effective test yet beyond DNA sequencing.
You need to check your unvaxxed privilege!
Aside from the obvious implication;
Could be that people who feel they are healthy are less likely to get vaccinated.
Could be that these people are younger and more resistant to infection anyway.
Could be that the unvaccinated are taking less risks (not working from home, spending prolonged time in crowded areas) than the vaccinated.