That's because the warming only shows up with you run it through dehomogenization software to remove "bias". The fact the surface temps, satellite temps and tree rings all seem to have the same bias is just a coincidence, of course.
Wait, but there should be a natural bias towards local warming that you need to correct down for.
They build the stations, and then as urban sprawl hits them, the area gets warmer from all the roads n buildings n shit.
So you should need to adjust for that and tweak that down. The fact they still need to add warming when theres a natural bias towards it based on weather stations being in now warmer spots...
Literally all the climate alarmists have is models. It's reminds me of this clip from the Simpsons. I can be quite confident in saying that their models would completely fall apart if they ever ran them backwards.
WattsUpWithThat used to have a great chart showing that about half the warming we'd experienced since the 20th century was actually "the past getting cooler" due to "corrections".
Unlike most sites, WUWT has a usable search function. I used it a few months ago to look up the University of Alabama in Huntsville shooting that happened in 2017 as a part of the "March for Science".
Funny that clip had the Climate Change warning akin to the Kung Flu. But go check out his site: interesting reads. Latest post is probably the reason for the lockout. He calls out all the crackpot sciences as a “pervasive, quasi-religious assumption of the Earth science community for as long as I can remember.”
I won't look up the exact data, but we're in year 5 or maybe 6 of a 17-yr solar down cycle, this was to be expected, and all surface temp reading shows it clearly.
That's because the warming only shows up with you run it through dehomogenization software to remove "bias". The fact the surface temps, satellite temps and tree rings all seem to have the same bias is just a coincidence, of course.
Wait, but there should be a natural bias towards local warming that you need to correct down for.
They build the stations, and then as urban sprawl hits them, the area gets warmer from all the roads n buildings n shit.
So you should need to adjust for that and tweak that down. The fact they still need to add warming when theres a natural bias towards it based on weather stations being in now warmer spots...
Literally all the climate alarmists have is models. It's reminds me of this clip from the Simpsons. I can be quite confident in saying that their models would completely fall apart if they ever ran them backwards.
It's also amazing to me how we managed to condition entire masses of people into thinking that anyone who presented conflicting evidence is a "denialist" and that anyone who didn't agree with the entire narrative wanted to skin puppies alive. And don't you ever dare bring up how they were 'warning' us about an impending ice age.
His website is still up. He just can't monetize it with google.
Who is he and what did he do?
Rumble sucks. LBRY (Odysee) is the future
WattsUpWithThat used to have a great chart showing that about half the warming we'd experienced since the 20th century was actually "the past getting cooler" due to "corrections".
im sure they still have it somewhere, that place is good.
Unlike most sites, WUWT has a usable search function. I used it a few months ago to look up the University of Alabama in Huntsville shooting that happened in 2017 as a part of the "March for Science".
Related to that, what the heck is it with every website no longer having a real search function :P?!
Give me back internet of 20 years ago and their search functions back please.
Funny that clip had the Climate Change warning akin to the Kung Flu. But go check out his site: interesting reads. Latest post is probably the reason for the lockout. He calls out all the crackpot sciences as a “pervasive, quasi-religious assumption of the Earth science community for as long as I can remember.”
Dr. Spencer’s Site
Real question is: faulty on purpose or stupidity?
We may have to go hard-core coal to slow the ice age starting in this grand solar minimum
I won't look up the exact data, but we're in year 5 or maybe 6 of a 17-yr solar down cycle, this was to be expected, and all surface temp reading shows it clearly.
"listen to experts" "no not those experts reeeee"
It's a shame his website is out of date now.