That's because the warming only shows up with you run it through dehomogenization software to remove "bias". The fact the surface temps, satellite temps and tree rings all seem to have the same bias is just a coincidence, of course.
Wait, but there should be a natural bias towards local warming that you need to correct down for.
They build the stations, and then as urban sprawl hits them, the area gets warmer from all the roads n buildings n shit.
So you should need to adjust for that and tweak that down. The fact they still need to add warming when theres a natural bias towards it based on weather stations being in now warmer spots...
Literally all the climate alarmists have is models. It's reminds me of this clip from the Simpsons. I can be quite confident in saying that their models would completely fall apart if they ever ran them backwards.
That's because the warming only shows up with you run it through dehomogenization software to remove "bias". The fact the surface temps, satellite temps and tree rings all seem to have the same bias is just a coincidence, of course.
Wait, but there should be a natural bias towards local warming that you need to correct down for.
They build the stations, and then as urban sprawl hits them, the area gets warmer from all the roads n buildings n shit.
So you should need to adjust for that and tweak that down. The fact they still need to add warming when theres a natural bias towards it based on weather stations being in now warmer spots...
Literally all the climate alarmists have is models. It's reminds me of this clip from the Simpsons. I can be quite confident in saying that their models would completely fall apart if they ever ran them backwards.
It's also amazing to me how we managed to condition entire masses of people into thinking that anyone who presented conflicting evidence is a "denialist" and that anyone who didn't agree with the entire narrative wanted to skin puppies alive. And don't you ever dare bring up how they were 'warning' us about an impending ice age.