I agree about not listing them on sex offender registries....
But probably not for the reason she does.
I don't think we should have the lists at all. The idea with prison is part punishment and part keeping a threat to society away from it. You do your time, you register, well society obviously thinks you're still a threat, so why get released?
If they're enough of a threat that we feel the need to track them just do away with the list and keep them locked up for good.
Only the most insane of lefties support child sex abuse. I've never met anyone in real life that actually defends "MAP"s.
All this does is bring to the surface the RINOs that have perhaps been caught with their fingers in the pies to look the other way on her support, leading to the kind of anger that will get them voted out. Clearly the Democrat play would be to replace those RINOs with full Democrats instead of part-time ones, but that's a such a massive miscalculation of where the voter is that there's no way it's going to go their way.
Of course, the "largest voter fraud organization in history" doesn't really care what the voters think, but they've spent the last 6 years or more denying there is a systematic effort to legitimize pedophilia, so I'm just surprised they'd just freely run this kind of play.
It's about leftists supporting pedophilia. Nobody thinks that all sex is bad, but if you don't think that sex with children is inarguably evil, you're evil yourself.
Honestly, I like her more after reading through this, I'm use to sexual-bullshitting from the left, maybe the right is upset they stole "their" thing now?
She’s suggested public policy is driven by a “climate of fear, hatred & revenge” against sex offenders
Yes. It definitely has been.
I'm not going to run through this all but I'll remind you that "child pornography" has been defined in the US as anyone under 18.
This has led to utterly absurd cases they've brought charges of "production and distribution of child pornography" against 2 teenagers, dating each other, who took pics of themselves and sent them to the other teenager.
As Rekieta Law would say.
THE. WALL.
The only way I would be shocked is if they nominated an upstanding white man, but even then I would expect a wolf in sheep's clothing.
You mean like the famous moderate Merrick "Sic the FBI on moms who don't like CRT" Garland?
Gee, I wonder why an infamous child-fondler thinks she's Supreme Court material.
I agree about not listing them on sex offender registries....
But probably not for the reason she does.
I don't think we should have the lists at all. The idea with prison is part punishment and part keeping a threat to society away from it. You do your time, you register, well society obviously thinks you're still a threat, so why get released?
If they're enough of a threat that we feel the need to track them just do away with the list and keep them locked up for good.
Or just throw them off a tall building
Ancient solutions for ancient problems
What about people that get CP installed on their computers by crazy fucking leftists or FBI/NSA/CIA? Do they also get the bullet immediately?
No, but that's because the spooks can't aim for shit.
diversity hire should be voted against by anyone with sense.
I'm genuinely surprised.
Only the most insane of lefties support child sex abuse. I've never met anyone in real life that actually defends "MAP"s.
All this does is bring to the surface the RINOs that have perhaps been caught with their fingers in the pies to look the other way on her support, leading to the kind of anger that will get them voted out. Clearly the Democrat play would be to replace those RINOs with full Democrats instead of part-time ones, but that's a such a massive miscalculation of where the voter is that there's no way it's going to go their way.
Of course, the "largest voter fraud organization in history" doesn't really care what the voters think, but they've spent the last 6 years or more denying there is a systematic effort to legitimize pedophilia, so I'm just surprised they'd just freely run this kind of play.
Untrue. You are what you vote for. That means that all leftists support child sex abuse.
Only the most smugly confident and evil among them will admit it.
Oh yawn.
What's this about, is the right upset that the left took over their "all sex is bad" stance so now they're having a fit?
Sounds like "yes, the right is upset the left took over their extremist exaggerations".
It's about leftists supporting pedophilia. Nobody thinks that all sex is bad, but if you don't think that sex with children is inarguably evil, you're evil yourself.
A pedophile nominated a pedophile?
GASP!!!
Honestly, I like her more after reading through this, I'm use to sexual-bullshitting from the left, maybe the right is upset they stole "their" thing now?
Yes. It definitely has been.
I'm not going to run through this all but I'll remind you that "child pornography" has been defined in the US as anyone under 18.
This has led to utterly absurd cases they've brought charges of "production and distribution of child pornography" against 2 teenagers, dating each other, who took pics of themselves and sent them to the other teenager.