That's their claim, not mine. They say women can tell who is evil.
Who does?
I don't know what you're talking about, I'm just sharing a bit of women's history because I'm so excited for March.
Pro tip: if I were you, I'd be spreading info about the terrorism of the suffragettes, and maybe their racial attitudes, because that is an actual vulnerable spot.
Dude, please. It's the 6th. So even if March was women's history month, which I have no clue if it is, we are weeks off... you just wanted to post this so you can jerk off here a bit. It has nothing to do with women's history month.
Also, why are you pretending people here on KIA2 don't know female Nazis/supporters/general citizens being real-or-faked enthusiastic about that at one point didn't exist?
Like OOOOOH, you are so brave and witty for telling us, people who already know, that some women are bad.
(And that's ignoring the fact that I'm pretty sure even back then there were just useful idiots who bought political shit. You will claim they don't exist, all women are just intentionally bloodthirsty monsters.)
What's next? Trying to tell us about the most notable female Nazis like Ilse Koch like you are selling some guarded feminist secret you smuggled out of a feminist bunker, risking your life?
Also, are we ignoring the fact that Hitler, the leader of that whole shit, was a man? Let me guess, he was blackmailed by a secret feminist mastermind to do whatever he did. Hitler did nothing wrong, it was a little known secret feminist mastermind.
At least wait until actual women's history month is here for real before you start the wank session.
Also, are we ignoring the fact that Hitler, the leader of that whole shit, was a man?
Adolf Hitler (nee Adolfine Schiklgruber) was actually female-to-transgender.
Let me guess, he was blackmailed by a secret feminist mastermind to do whatever he did. Hitler did nothing wrong, it was a little known secret feminist mastermind.
Heh, he's tried to blame crime committed by men on single mothers who 'abuse' them. I said that by that standard, Hitler's poor mother would be to blame for his actions, but that is the one instance that he denied .He never explained why though.
Almost a whole month before, for an event you have to do nothing for. Just admit it, you thought it was smart and couldn't contain yourself. The whole "women's history month" thing was just an excuse. You post the literal same shit on any given day.
Keep in mind his behaviour mirrors that of SJWs frequently.
Without his pet project existing would have nothing to talk about.
Has actively posted about wanting groups to suffer in the many ways he complains about [possibly] happening... so he then has something to complain about ala "eternal oppression" victimhood.
Ignores all the times he's wrong and then dances like a madman the few times he's right because when you throw all the shit at the wall something will inevitably stick despite how many attempts it takes.
Women are his dragon and without them he'd have nothing to do or say to the point he needs them more than he will ever willingly admit or consider.
I've always thought ironically that he is more of a mirror for the Stormfag.
Whenever they don't like something, they look for the first proximate Jew they can find to blame everything on, and he does the same with women. Obviously, there being more women than Jews, he has more success.
Both think (invisible, as they're not even religious) yarmulkes and vaginas respectively somehow qualify you to puppeteer everyone else around you.
However, just based on the impression that I have of him, I do not believe that he is a bad person. Just a bit whacked.
Oh wow, natzees bad. What a stunning, brave, and completely unprecedented vector of attack. I am sure it it no way adopts the mythology of the post war consensus wherein german moustache man is the devil and personifies the entirety of evil. After all, it's not like that mythology is the driver for every adopted feminist policy, making this attack entirely toothless
The difference is that supporting the family helps men and women. The family is the foundational unit of society, not the individual. Granted, strong and good individuals are a requirement for a healthy society, but the individual doesn't perpetuate society. You're argument about not using tax money to pay for welfare is fair, though. Different societies are free to explore either side, if it's for the benefit of the people, and not due to corruption. Large centralized governments almost universally become corrupt, however.
Humans are sexually dimorphic. Men and women evolved to be physically and mentally different. It's so the two sexes can specialize in different roles, while working together, to increase species efficiency. All work environments employ the same principle. Different workers specialize in different tasks, and work together to achieve a better product more efficiently. Men and women bargain with each other in a relationship. The man provides security and protection for the woman, and the woman provides the man with exclusive breeding rights. This, in combination with our evolved differences, results in the man accruing resources and doing laborious and dangerous tasks away from the home/tribe, and the woman taking care of the children and home, doing the less laborious and safer tasks. Both sexes benefit from this arrangement. A man's sexual market value increases the better he can protect and the more resources he has. A woman's sexual market value is correlated precisely to how many and healthy children she can bear, meaning beauty and youth is prioritized.
However, the West became so successful that it's usurped the role of men, both in the private sector and through government. We've created relative safety in our success, resources are abundant, and women now pursue their own careers and work jobs to accrue their own resources. Women have also been given voting rights, and because of their more empathetic and emotional nature, they can be more easily manipulated and have voted in government largess, more welfare, and increased the size of the nanny and police state. It's one of the main reasons why women have become so insanely picky in the dating market, why they initiate most of the divorces, why marriage rates are so low, and why we're not having enough children. This can't sustain itself, though, and when society inevitably collapses, the protection and resources that women now enjoy, free from fathers and husbands, would disappear. Women would require men on the individual scale again.
Imp1 instead of this would you be willing to help me build a "national" (meaning internet) month of memorialization and pride for men in November?
Seeing as the majority of the system wants to ensure that the men who fought and died in ww 1 and 2, Korea, Nam, Afghanistan, the gulf, Afghanistan again, Iraq, Ukraine soon-- they want to make sure their sacrifice is meaningless (vaxx mandates are making sure of that)
I think thats wrong I'm sure you agree. I think men and boys need a month of recognition and pride for themselves. Not a jack Murphy whatever the fuck. A more somber devotion to self---
No nut november actually was part of the inspiration. A month of brotherhood and voluntary celibacy where we withhold everything including our time and wallets, keeping it for ourselves and our brothers alone.
Please note this idea is in infancy and I'm not sure how you build this from nothing
I want a non-meme one. That's really grounded in masculine virtues as opposed to just 'no fap'. Yknow? It should be about more than just not watching porn for a month.
1 month of shameless solidarity and brotherhood. Men supporting men, you got it. But no alpha/sigma/beta-- none of that. I get it but I think it should be more about all men wholesale. Ideally lifting any betas into seeing themselves as capable of self improvement to become more like an 'alpha' and empowering alphas to be leaders of men not dominators of men.
Again it's still in infancy
No one says you can't have both a TS and a Gab. Beware of TS, word on the street is it's still ultimately governed by the Google platform
Is there a women history month? I know currently it is black history month, then we have 2 month and 3 weeks for 2SLGBTPAIQP+, they added a latino month as well.
There are many diversity months and several diversity days
Men get 1, for fathers, sometimes. I would say veterans day or memorial day because naturally men were the ones sacrificing in war. But even that's been robbed
Fucking shit I hate this months.
So I'm to fully expect another series of women in tech and women in management sessions. It used to be optional but last year they did make some of them mandatory.
It is becoming o so tiresome, if I could back I would not get in to IT.
"Wow, some German women greeting the leader of their country! I hate women now."
(how Imp thinks people will react)
I guess only 55% of women can see 'true evil in leaders', not the 45% who did vote for Trump. Ironically, that 55% does like Bill Clinton.
So either one has to hate women because there's a picture of German women greeting their leader, or Hitler was a good guy. Such a nuanced thinker.
Who does?
Pro tip: if I were you, I'd be spreading info about the terrorism of the suffragettes, and maybe their racial attitudes, because that is an actual vulnerable spot.
Dude, please. It's the 6th. So even if March was women's history month, which I have no clue if it is, we are weeks off... you just wanted to post this so you can jerk off here a bit. It has nothing to do with women's history month.
Also, why are you pretending people here on KIA2 don't know female Nazis/supporters/general citizens being real-or-faked enthusiastic about that at one point didn't exist?
Like OOOOOH, you are so brave and witty for telling us, people who already know, that some women are bad.
(And that's ignoring the fact that I'm pretty sure even back then there were just useful idiots who bought political shit. You will claim they don't exist, all women are just intentionally bloodthirsty monsters.)
What's next? Trying to tell us about the most notable female Nazis like Ilse Koch like you are selling some guarded feminist secret you smuggled out of a feminist bunker, risking your life?
Also, are we ignoring the fact that Hitler, the leader of that whole shit, was a man? Let me guess, he was blackmailed by a secret feminist mastermind to do whatever he did. Hitler did nothing wrong, it was a little known secret feminist mastermind.
At least wait until actual women's history month is here for real before you start the wank session.
Adolf Hitler (nee Adolfine Schiklgruber) was actually female-to-transgender.
Heh, he's tried to blame crime committed by men on single mothers who 'abuse' them. I said that by that standard, Hitler's poor mother would be to blame for his actions, but that is the one instance that he denied .He never explained why though.
Almost a whole month before, for an event you have to do nothing for. Just admit it, you thought it was smart and couldn't contain yourself. The whole "women's history month" thing was just an excuse. You post the literal same shit on any given day.
Keep in mind his behaviour mirrors that of SJWs frequently.
Women are his dragon and without them he'd have nothing to do or say to the point he needs them more than he will ever willingly admit or consider.
I've always thought ironically that he is more of a mirror for the Stormfag.
Whenever they don't like something, they look for the first proximate Jew they can find to blame everything on, and he does the same with women. Obviously, there being more women than Jews, he has more success.
Both think (invisible, as they're not even religious) yarmulkes and vaginas respectively somehow qualify you to puppeteer everyone else around you.
However, just based on the impression that I have of him, I do not believe that he is a bad person. Just a bit whacked.
Mere words prove you right?
No wonder you keep getting deceived by politicians. They are expert at saying stuff.
Oh wow, natzees bad. What a stunning, brave, and completely unprecedented vector of attack. I am sure it it no way adopts the mythology of the post war consensus wherein german moustache man is the devil and personifies the entirety of evil. After all, it's not like that mythology is the driver for every adopted feminist policy, making this attack entirely toothless
I thought it was to families, not women.
Good. That's the one thing the Nazis did do right.
Well, I'm paying for your poor decisions.
The difference is that supporting the family helps men and women. The family is the foundational unit of society, not the individual. Granted, strong and good individuals are a requirement for a healthy society, but the individual doesn't perpetuate society. You're argument about not using tax money to pay for welfare is fair, though. Different societies are free to explore either side, if it's for the benefit of the people, and not due to corruption. Large centralized governments almost universally become corrupt, however.
Humans are sexually dimorphic. Men and women evolved to be physically and mentally different. It's so the two sexes can specialize in different roles, while working together, to increase species efficiency. All work environments employ the same principle. Different workers specialize in different tasks, and work together to achieve a better product more efficiently. Men and women bargain with each other in a relationship. The man provides security and protection for the woman, and the woman provides the man with exclusive breeding rights. This, in combination with our evolved differences, results in the man accruing resources and doing laborious and dangerous tasks away from the home/tribe, and the woman taking care of the children and home, doing the less laborious and safer tasks. Both sexes benefit from this arrangement. A man's sexual market value increases the better he can protect and the more resources he has. A woman's sexual market value is correlated precisely to how many and healthy children she can bear, meaning beauty and youth is prioritized.
However, the West became so successful that it's usurped the role of men, both in the private sector and through government. We've created relative safety in our success, resources are abundant, and women now pursue their own careers and work jobs to accrue their own resources. Women have also been given voting rights, and because of their more empathetic and emotional nature, they can be more easily manipulated and have voted in government largess, more welfare, and increased the size of the nanny and police state. It's one of the main reasons why women have become so insanely picky in the dating market, why they initiate most of the divorces, why marriage rates are so low, and why we're not having enough children. This can't sustain itself, though, and when society inevitably collapses, the protection and resources that women now enjoy, free from fathers and husbands, would disappear. Women would require men on the individual scale again.
You are such a sad, bitter, antisocial little guy. Exactly like a feminist.
It's becoming more and more apparent he stared into the abyss that fucking much, isn't it?
Wouldn't that kill off humanity?
Im gonna say the n word
https://youtube.com/watch?v=zIV4poUZAQo
Imp1 instead of this would you be willing to help me build a "national" (meaning internet) month of memorialization and pride for men in November?
Seeing as the majority of the system wants to ensure that the men who fought and died in ww 1 and 2, Korea, Nam, Afghanistan, the gulf, Afghanistan again, Iraq, Ukraine soon-- they want to make sure their sacrifice is meaningless (vaxx mandates are making sure of that)
I think thats wrong I'm sure you agree. I think men and boys need a month of recognition and pride for themselves. Not a jack Murphy whatever the fuck. A more somber devotion to self---
No nut november actually was part of the inspiration. A month of brotherhood and voluntary celibacy where we withhold everything including our time and wallets, keeping it for ourselves and our brothers alone.
Please note this idea is in infancy and I'm not sure how you build this from nothing
Thoughts? Are you on Gab btw?
I want a non-meme one. That's really grounded in masculine virtues as opposed to just 'no fap'. Yknow? It should be about more than just not watching porn for a month.
1 month of shameless solidarity and brotherhood. Men supporting men, you got it. But no alpha/sigma/beta-- none of that. I get it but I think it should be more about all men wholesale. Ideally lifting any betas into seeing themselves as capable of self improvement to become more like an 'alpha' and empowering alphas to be leaders of men not dominators of men.
Again it's still in infancy
No one says you can't have both a TS and a Gab. Beware of TS, word on the street is it's still ultimately governed by the Google platform
Shi Zhengli - Bioweapon of the year 2019
Is there a women history month? I know currently it is black history month, then we have 2 month and 3 weeks for 2SLGBTPAIQP+, they added a latino month as well.
There are many diversity months and several diversity days
Men get 1, for fathers, sometimes. I would say veterans day or memorial day because naturally men were the ones sacrificing in war. But even that's been robbed
Even men day was turned to fighting toxic masculinity.
Fucking shit I hate this months. So I'm to fully expect another series of women in tech and women in management sessions. It used to be optional but last year they did make some of them mandatory. It is becoming o so tiresome, if I could back I would not get in to IT.